[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Nationalist fearmongering does not make you free either, fellow slave

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago

Oh my god who cares

All these comapnies have your data, which they sell to anyone willing to buy it

Including the Chinese govt

This anti-Tik Tok campaign is just jingoistic noise and makes the US no better than the CPC who censored Facebook and Twitter years ago

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago
[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Why not just charge a head tax? Wouldn't want the dastardly Chinese "improving their public health system", would we

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

More often than Palestinians have been able to vote for the Israeli leadership, i.e. never.

"Khaled Mashaal, its leader, has publicly affirmed the movement's readiness to accept the borders of 1967. When Hamas won a majority in the 2006 Palestinian legislative election, Haniyeh, the then president-elect, sent messages both to George W. Bush and to Israel's leaders, asking to be recognized and offering a long-term truce (hudna), along the 1967 border lines. No response came."

"In November 2011, Hamas leader Khaled Mishal made an agreement with Mahmoud Abbas in Cairo, in which he committed to respecting the 1967 borders."

"In February 2012, according to the Palestinian authority, Hamas forswore the use of violence. Evidence for this was provided by an eruption of violence from Islamic Jihad in March 2012 after an Israeli assassination of a Jihad leader, during which Hamas refrained from attacking Israel. "Israel—despite its mantra that because Hamas is sovereign in Gaza it is responsible for what goes on there—almost seems to understand," wrote Israeli journalists Avi Issacharoff and Amos Harel, "and has not bombed Hamas offices or installations".

(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas)

Of course there should be more elections in Palestine. But there should be a Palestine first, something that Israel's actions are not facilitating.

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

What I'm "promoting" is the analysis provided by top humanitarian organisations:

'"Once again the U.S. cynically used their veto to prevent the U.N. Security Council from acting on Israel and Palestine at a time of unprecedented carnage," said Human Rights Watch'

What you are promoting is pure spin. You cannot possibly be so naive, so you must be deliberately obtuse.

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

You sound like you actively want war

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I would understand that Hamas is a symptom of the repression and poverty of Palestinians, and endeavour towards a diplomatic two state solution.

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

The bombing and forced migration of a captive civilian population is not self defense. It is the textbook definition of genocide.

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

All this noise about China and India and it turns out the call was coming from inside the house

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Oh, is that right? So what kind of sentence should Trump should get then...?

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

^^^ both of these are what you're looking for OP

view more: next ›

cfbundy

joined 1 year ago