212

Former TikTok senior data scientist:

“I literally worked on a project that gave U.S. data to China”

“They were completely complicit in that. There were Americans that were working in upper management that were completely complicit in this.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

As an American, I would be appalled if my data were provided to the Chinese government for anything less than Meta charges to provide that info. It’s just unfair to TikTok and I believe in a free market in commoditizing the lives of human beings.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Ok, fine. I concede the point. Replace Meta with 50 data brokers that sell “anonymized” location data on everyone who ever downloaded a free app.

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Is this where we post the shocked Pikachu face? Or do they only accept Pooh bear memes?

[-] MichaelTen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

If only anyone could have known

[-] MichaelTen@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

No one could have predicted this. (Satire)

I see Chinese in on tiktok semi regularly at least it seems.

Did the ceo lie to usa congress under oath?

Limitless Peace

[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Absolutely the CEO lied, but unfortunately our government lacks the teeth to put him in jail.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I wonder how this plays out if he lied under oath tbh.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 months ago

No one is fighting for tiktok thinking it didn't share info with China. The problem is China can just buy our data from a number of data brokers. Every social media, shopping, and US website collects your info to be sold. That's the problem. The singled out tiktok bc China was collecting it free and people are learning how corrupt our US government is.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Sooo... no different than Google working with the US government, then.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 4 points 5 months ago

Clearly false - Google is banned in China.

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago

Oh my god who cares

All these comapnies have your data, which they sell to anyone willing to buy it

Including the Chinese govt

This anti-Tik Tok campaign is just jingoistic noise and makes the US no better than the CPC who censored Facebook and Twitter years ago

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Oh my god who cares

All these comapnies have your data, which they sell to anyone willing to buy of

Conformity is a slave mindset. Just because its done and legal does not mean its right.

[-] cfbundy@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Nationalist fearmongering does not make you free either, fellow slave

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That's why I'm not a nationalist. Nice try tho.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Doyee

NSA just mad they don't get to plug their dedicated spyware directly into it.

That's why they want it to become US owned.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Anyway, let's say this is true. What can China do with this data?

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
212 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers
2640 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS