Same. I worked in an electronics store. This was one of the manufacturers where products broke so often we had a separate bin for their broken products.

But it was also one of the "refund anytime, no questions asked" manufacturers where we could just say how many value of products we got returned and they would just refund the amount to us. No pesky RMA process, no repairs, just take it back whenever the customer is unhappy and throw it away.

Da ist ein iOS-Link mit einer wait-list. Wie implementierst Du das auf iOS? Mein Kenntnisstand ist zugegebenermaßen ein paar Jahre veraltet, aber ich dachte App A kann nix anzeigen, wenn App B auf ist, so wie das bei Android mit der "draw on other apps"-Permission der Fall ist.
Gab es da eine Änderung oder wird das ein Tweak der nen Jailbreak erfordert?

Yeah that or aliens.

Huh. Thanks for answering. But this kind of breaks the intentions of a federated construct, doesn't it?

In the worst case, I'd just block people from that instance, but not defederate it. That way my users could still interact with their community but their users couldn't disrupt my instance.

Many smaller instances have defederated from lemmy.world, for example

Why?

Idk if hangovers are more intensive for me or if I'm just overly sensitive, but I've stopped getting drunk simply because of hangovers. I'm just past the point where the upsides of drinking alcohol aren't worth the intensity of the hangover after it. It's just not fun anymore.

And I don't understand how people the same age as me or older still get wasted and just shrug at the hangover, if they even have one. I still drink alcohol rarely, but probably never get wasted at memory-loss level ever again.

I have lots of different things I'm doing, not simultaneously but all of them regularly.
I have a hobby for which im using ~5-10 different sites regularly. And another hobby with ~3-5 sites.
Then I have a business where I keep all relevant tabs open, which are quite a few as well. Then all the general stuff (emails etc). And I probably still forgot something.

I'm still far away from the 100s, but I do keep around 20-30 tabs open all the time, and that doesn't include any temporary tabs that I do close right after using it. I have them all sorted and separated using Firefox' containers feature though.

Yes I could work with bookmarks too, but that has a few downsides. For example, for my business I am working with different Google drive folders for each project. It would be annoying to keep the bookmarks up to date or to navigate to the relevant folder each time when I can just leave the tab open and continue where I left off. Another example is one of my hobbies where I use the same 10 sites every time, so I'd have to open 10 sites when I do the hobby and then close them when I'm done, which seems redundant to me for just the benefit of not having tabs open I'm not using at the moment.
So ultimately, to me it's way easier to have an overview of 30 open tabs than managing endless bookmarks that I need to keep up to date.

What I would prefer is a feature where I can have different environments and all tabs of that environment open and close automatically. So I say I want the environment "work" and my 10 work tabs open, then I work, then I switch the environment profile and all current work tabs' updated URLs get saved and the other environment's tabs open. If there's anything like that I'd be thankful for a recommendation.
That's the only way I see me not having dozens of tabs open all the time honestly.

I think most browsers do this. IIRC Chrome puts a ":D" there if you exceed 99

This feels like reverse psychology on a little kid.

"That's it, I'm not tracking you anymore! >:("
"Oooh nooo, what have I done! Oh how much I would wish to be tracked :("
"No, you won't convince me to change my mind >:("
"Oh well, guess I'll have to live without being tracked, what a shame that is."

Bei www.ldi.nrw.de bin ich nicht fündig geworden

Nach 2-3 Klicks habe ich das hier gefunden. Ist das nicht schon das, wonach Du suchst? Ausfüllen und per Email schicken. Zu meiner Überraschung sogar mit PGP möglich.

Inclusive doesn't mean they let everybody in regardless

It does. I mean, if they not let everybody participate it's by definition an exclusive community. In this case exclusive to women. Which is fine, but it is not universally inclusive (as the word "inclusive" without any further definition implies).

I get what they probably want to say - they include every woman, regardless of age/nationality, if it's a MTF trans woman etc. But they could have expressed this better - i.e. "inclusive community for women" or something.

On the other hand, you're supposed to read the rules when you post in a community the first time so this confusion could've been avoided by both sides.