At first I didn’t believe it was legit.
The intent behind OP’s statement is pure, and is shared almost universally.
But the specific proposal misunderstands so much about why laws are made and how they’re enforced, how power is abused, why hate isn’t illegal, how businesses work, how harm is measured, etc, that the most generous interpretation is that we’re communicating with an inexperienced mind. In this case, apparently hundreds of them.
On the other hand, no one is born with that experience, and it’s healthy for people (including myself) to keep that in mind.
I think it’s just called “Lemmy.”
Also, “start over” is a bit dramatic. I think you mean hit up-enter to rerun the training.
It’s a strange accounting method, that almost completely reflects wealth distribution and ignores carbon.
For instance, you might say childhood obesity is a problem, then measure people’s investments in fast food as a measure of their contribution to the problem. And find that it’s the same people at fault, at almost the exact same percentage!
Do you just keep that on the clipboard?
Absolutely… the subjective experience is an objective fact.
Copilot is pretty amazing for day to day coding, although I wonder if a junior dev might get led astray with some of its bad ideas, or too dependent on it in general.
Edit: shit, maybe I’m too dependent on it.
You might be interested to know there’s several layouts, and developers get to choose which one appears: https://nijatmanafov.medium.com/10-keyboard-types-in-ios-6497beeb66b2
Meta might already be secretly running any number of existing instances. For that matter, someone else you don’t trust definitely already is.
Some flavor of meownotheism, yes