Please let this sink the stock even more.
The average person does not have 10 fingers. Maybe the median person, but not the average.
For context, this is apparently output of GitHub Copilot: https://mastodon.social/@gvwilson/113549897292144975
This has the added benefit of stripping Meghan Markle of her citizenship as well.
I really have no opinion of Meghan Markle but thought this was funny. It's insane that it'd be easier to ratify an amendment from 1810 which would impact a good handful of people to target Alito, than implement robust Supreme Court ethics reforms.
Also it was weeks after January 6th, security was high and I'm sure everyone who was there was on edge imagining a crazy MAGA supporter with a gun or a bomb.
It's the multiverse, they should have multiple versions of Kang played by Kevin Spacey, Ezra Miller, Harvey Weinstein, etc... they're the ultimate villians
Fun fact, it's not counterfeiting if the denomination doesn't exist, so the charge would be theft by deception. In the early 2000s, there were several cases of people using a $200 bill and getting change back on their purchases, and not able to be charged with counterfeiting.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6491668
https://www.deseret.com/2001/2/1/19566991/phony-200-bill-with-bush-picture-used-in-kentucky/
Police in Kentucky are looking for a customer who succeeded in paying for a $2 order at a fast-food restaurant with a phony $200 bill featuring a picture of President George W. Bush and a depiction of the White House with a lawn sign saying, "We like broccoli."
Authorities say the female cashier at a Dairy Queen in Danville even gave the culprit $198 in real money as change.
Seriously, now that this is more widely known, it'll for sure be taken advantage of a lot, to the point AWS will begrudgingly protect their customers once the damage is done.
It all started with:
Update - Fix has been deployed, Slack integrations are recovering
Nov 03, 2023 - 17:22 UTC
This is why you don't release on a Friday!
Madeleine Stone, of the campaign group Big Brother Watch, is concerned about the slow creep of facial recognition technology.
“It is unacceptable to have police and private companies writing their own rules on the use of such a powerful surveillance technology,” she says. “We urgently need a democratic, lawful approach to the role of facial biometrics in Britain, but so far there hasn’t even been a parliamentary debate on it.”
Glad they devoted 3 whole sentences about this more than halfway down the article /s
Also, no mention of machine learning training bias or false positive rates of the existing technology? There's so much which could have been fleshed out in this article.
So this is why they're all in Airplane mode when they're brand new? TIL