[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 4 days ago

Watching everything burn isn't praxis. Their strategy is to let fascists win, so they aren't even anti-fascist. It's self-defeating because it helps no one and gets us further from progressive and socialist goals.

I argue with a lot of people arguing for accelerationism so there is my comment and post history. Alternatively you could go through the Political Memes, politics, News, and World News communities. Political Memes would probably be the easiest to find relevant posts and comments.

The search bar is a helpful tool for this. Individual communities can be selected to be searched. Searching on accelerationism is a good place to start. Once you find some users arguing against or for this rhetoric you can review their comment and post history.

I have been participating in and following along with the political discourse on lemmy. Lots of other people have to. I'm not the only one who has noticed the prevalence of accelerationism rhetoric or the only person arguing against accelertionism.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 6 days ago

Look, I don’t know if you guys haven’t been paying attention

I've been talking to people about climate change on this site.

(which it really didn’t in the long run did it?)

If we give up before we succeed then that's a self-fulfilling prophecy. The Democrats are neoliberals. They aren't going to solve our problems. But them being in power will give us the time to educate people and co-opt their party.

I give my argument about what that involves in more detail in this same comment section here: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/11577918

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 6 days ago

I’m not.

You are. I even gave the receipts. They were different, but people on the left didn't want to hear it.

Democrats are great at promising shit they have no intention of doing and then gleefully announcing that their hands are tied.

That's what a refusal to remove the filibuster and a razor thin majority will do. Manchin and Sinema were devastatingly effective in their obstruction. That's what a systemic issue can do in a nutshell. With the Senate, a tiny minority can overturn the will of the majority. Our refusal to fix it is part of how we got here. And things will continue to get worse if we don't take steps to fix it.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 6 days ago

Democrats have no concept of solidarity. None.

Democrats have only recently been openly favorable to gay people within the last decade. Minorities have been using the Democrats to shift things to the left in this country for decades before that.

They just haven’t thrown you under the bus yet, but they’ve let you know that they will. Their candidates have been using the Republican “boys in girls’ sports” hatred in their campaign ads.

I'm aware of the messaging. That's still not the same as a ban on gender affirming care, removal of employment protections, and the rounding up of homeless people.

Rail workers

Biden actually helped rail workers. He should have stuck with them from the start and done more, but it's better than nothing.

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/1155763336/freight-rail-workers-union-paid-sick-leave-bernie-sanders-csx

The people who I would have expected solidarity from is the left. But instead I am constantly confronted by people who want moral victory over the Democrats. In this arrangement, I am the ball. Instead of kicking me, how about we leverage power to help people.

Vote for Democrats in elections not because they will fix our problems, stand with us, or even do what we want, but because it is how we demonstrate power to the fascists. It's how we protect the people that Republicans want to harm and kill. It's how we buy time to get a populist movement to co-opt the Democratic Party.

[-] ToastedPlanet 5 points 6 days ago

No, I mean populist. Populism is what is popular right now.

https://www.wordnik.com/words/populism

A political philosophy supporting the rights and power of the people in their struggle against the privileged elite.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Why must one of those parties be the Democrats? I don’t see no fucking Whigs around, do you?

Because unlike the Wigs, the Democrats are not divided over slavery. They can just move to the right on contemporary issues as Chris Murphy details here. edit: typo

Democrats won’t reduce any harm.

Hi, I'm a trans person. I'm not the most at risk trans person since I'm pre-transition, but it's definitely a case of they would if they could. I would not like to be murdered in a death camp please. Like if Democrats can't get trans messaging right, because they suck at winning, fine. At least they aren't trying to completely ostracize me from society and make me dig my own grave. I hope that gives a different perspective on this.

[-] ToastedPlanet 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This rhetoric is what is known as accelerationism. It's the idea that things have to get worse in order for them to get better. The United States not existing would mean the collapse of a society that supports about 340 million people. Letting the US burn to the ground is not useful, because it doesn't help any of the people living here.

The truth is that things get better when people learn from their mistakes and the bad things that happen to them. They then use that knowledge to make things better. There's no bottom to how bad things can get. Things can always get worse. And they will get worse unless we work to make them better.

Anyone can be tempted by the idea that they can make things better by letting them burn. But letting everything burn is how to harm the most people possible. In order to help anyone, we need to start leveraging power for each other. That means giving up on moral victories and analyzing strategies using utility instead of moral reasoning. edit: typo

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Votes in high population states count less than votes in low population states, because of the electoral college, but they still count.

This isn't about placating the Democrats. It's about not using minorities as currency for a moral victory over the Democrats. The moral victory may feel good, but it isn't useful. A moral victory will not prevent key tipping points in the Earth's ecosystem that will cause catastrophic damage to the environment. Nor will it protect minorities from the fascists who want to kill them.

Hopefully the 10 million people will learn to leverage power by voting for the Democrats in elections even if they don't get anything out of it. Because we all have something to lose by Republicans taking power in the short term. Even if we won't all feel it until the long term.

The Democratic Party does need a populist narrative to appeal to a broader base, but the Democrats are unlikely to listen. The party needs to be hijacked the way Trump hijacked the Republican Party and the way Bernie tried to hijack the Democratic Party. Part of doing that is delaying fascism so that there are still elections and people to run against fascists. edit: typo

Edit: do you have an article or transcript for the link? I’m not a video person I prefer to read

  1. Go to the video.
  2. Go to the video description.
  3. Click ...more.
  4. Scroll to the Transcript section.
  5. Click Show transcript.
  6. Click on a line of the auto-generated transcript to bring up the scroll bar.
  7. Click and drag the scroll bar to read the transcript.
[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 6 days ago

Without rank choice voting any progressive party would act as a spoiler for the Democratic Party. Debilitating ourselves in this way isn't particularly useful for leveraging power to create better outcomes for the environment and minorities.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 6 days ago

While this strategy may feel good, it makes the minorities Republicans want to hurt the cost of doing business. Even if Democrats can't deliver on anything substantial in the short term voting for them in elections is useful.

First, it reduces the harm done to minorities. Second, it demonstrates there is a progressive voter block the democrats could shift closer to. Third, assuming we get more elections and the Democrats aren't all in jail, it creates time for a progressive, like the Democrats your argument listed, to co-opt the Democratic Party. Like what Trump did to the Republicans and Bernie tried to do to the Democrats.

Rather than trying to achieve moral victory over Democrats, let's leverage power for the people Republicans want to hurt.

[-] ToastedPlanet 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

While the plan you've outlined in your argument my feel good, it isn't particularly useful for shifting the Democrats to the left. Under this plan, the causalities of this and future Republican administrations will be the cost of doing business.

Consider leveraging power by voting for Democrats in elections to benefit the people who will otherwise be harmed by future Republican administrations. edit: typo

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 6 days ago

This is what the incoming Trump administration wants to do to the US.

60
submitted 2 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/science@lemmy.world
311
submitted 2 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/politics@lemmy.world
179
submitted 3 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/world@lemmy.world
3
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world
91
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by ToastedPlanet to c/lgbtq_plus
42
submitted 3 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/world@lemmy.world
61
Utility Rules! (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by ToastedPlanet to c/196

[Alt-text] Spongebob and Patrick work out their strategy with a utility based analysis.

We tend to assume that the means accomplish the ends, but that's not necessarily the case. The trolley problem never looks at where the trolley is going, just how it gets there. But if the way we want to get there doesn't actually go to the destination we want, then it's not a solution. Hope this helps. =D

edit: trolley is spelled with an e

168
submitted 3 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/world@lemmy.world
181
OL' RULEiABLE (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by ToastedPlanet to c/196

[Alt-Text] Spongebob reminds us the tried and true way to get Fascists' goats, is to call them weird. Their fragile egos simply can't take it.

I don't know who needs to see this. Trump has explicitly identified himself as a fascist at this point. Upsetting fascists' fragile egos is the best rhetorical way to get at them. In short, call them weird.

The DNC consultants are trying their hardest to sink Kamala's and Walz's campaign. Get this message in an email or a fax or a billboard to as many people as we can. We need to hit Trump where it hurts in these last few days to get him off balance. edit: typo

Call him weird, point out how people keep leaving his rallies early, point out his supporters don't even like him and are just using him. Stuff that can only bother a malignant narcissist like Trump.

Also, Vote!

https://vote.gov/

121
submitted 3 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lgbtq_plus
231
submitted 3 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/politics@lemmy.world
2
submitted 4 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world
view more: ‹ prev next ›

ToastedPlanet

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF