168
submitted 4 weeks ago by ToastedPlanet to c/world@lemmy.world
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tiefling 60 points 4 weeks ago
[-] ToastedPlanet 61 points 4 weeks ago

100% I have no confidence in Israel's ability to comply with international law or humanitarian norms. As a jew, I am less safe because of Israel's genocide of the Palestinians. There is no interest in self-defense or defeating terrorists. Netanyahu wants to prolong the war to stay out of prison and to create a greater Israel. Israel attacking the UN troops has really ticked me off too.

[-] remer@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

It’s not that they don’t have the ability. They just don’t care.

[-] McDropout@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Babe wake up, the terrorists are the Israelis 🖤

And before I am accused of anti-semitism. Any Israeli who takes part of the IOF is a terrorist. Whether it may be druze, jewish, christian or muslim.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Telling someone who clearly agrees with you to 'wake up' because they didn't use the exact language you wanted them to is pretty rude.

[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 36 points 4 weeks ago

Fun.

“I was on my couch watching Adventure Time when World War III started.”

[-] ToastedPlanet 13 points 4 weeks ago

Fuck me. I just came in from yard work. "I was touching grass." It's not any better.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 4 weeks ago

Adventure Time seems to be a good post apocalyptic world all things considered.

[-] ToastedPlanet 10 points 4 weeks ago

To be fair, Adventure Time is set a 1000 years after the apocalypse, so they've had a lot time to build.

[-] doctortofu@reddthat.com 28 points 4 weeks ago

How many military orphanages, military preschools and military press tents are they planning to strike this time? Are military supermarkets, military food banks and military temples also on the target list, or not this time?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 4 weeks ago

Very valid concerns but it seems their response was limited to military targets. Which makes sense; I don't think they wanna genocide Iran so targeting civilians would be meaningless.

[-] prole 4 points 3 weeks ago

Right, and they've been saying that about Gaza for over a year too, haven't they?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 3 weeks ago

They wanna genocide Gaza. Everyone knows that. Lebanon too. Both are part of their "greater Israel". Iran isn't AFAIK.

[-] ToastedPlanet 3 points 3 weeks ago

When it comes to Iran I think it's a case of Israel would if they could. But Iran is out of their reach.

[-] ToastedPlanet 4 points 4 weeks ago

It looks like the response was limited this time. That's not to say that there won't be a next time where they go overboard.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 weeks ago

Just after the markets close, Monday is gonna be interesting

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That might indicate that this really is a proportional response, the kind that Iran has already signaled they would not retaliate against.

By giving the market the weekend to confirm that Israel has not significantly escalated over Iran's attack, it could very well temper market movement. Especially if it's confirmed they did not strike any energy infrastructure.

Of course this is israel, so unless America behind the scenes is actually applying pressure for once, they could decide to strike all of their oil facilities tomorrow.

I guess we'll see soon enough.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm just glad I got gas yesterday.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Me too, I need to order fuel for the ranch bulk tanks too. We have a couple 300gal bulk tanks that usually get filled in the fall and I've totally forgotten to so far...

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 13 points 4 weeks ago

I hope that both countries now are aware of the damage they could cause to each other. Israel can overwhelm Irans air-defense with their stealth bombers. Iran can overwhelm Israels missile defense with barrages of ballistic missiles.

Even before the nuclear escalation level they both can inflict very serious damage to each other and their respective defense systems are not able to prevent attacks, only mitigate some of it.

I am looking forward to the price calculations for this one. For the Iranian missile attack 01. October iirc. the damage was considered to be in the range of $ 50 Mio. With the Iranian missiles supposedly costing around $ 100k each, that would be about $ 20 Mio. For the attack i couldn't find Israels interceptions costs. For the April attack it was sought to be around $ 550 Mio. So i would expect the October interception to have cost at least similarly. $ 600/20 Mio. is a 30 to 1 ratio.

Sending F-35s long ways is expensive, but with the more precise strikes that could have inflicted substantial damage at key points.

[-] Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sounds like they hit some missile manufacturing facilities. Hopefully they also hit some drone facilities.
Less missiles and drones for Russia's attacks on Ukraine and for the Iranian militias' attacks on the Kurds in Syria and Iraq.

Edit: Seems like they did also hit drone facilities. Less Shahed drones for Russia.

[-] small44@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I hope Israel and Iran destroy each other

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian's op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a "blogposts" tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/26/idf-israel-iran-strikes-explosions-tehran
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
168 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2206 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS