The retcon of Belinda's history also bothered me. It kind of gave me those Moffat-era vibes, where women could go on fun, exciting adventures and all of that but eventually they'd settle down in the wife and/or mother role that represents the person they're really supposed to be. Boo. I didn't think RTD2 would echo Moffat like that and I'm as much disappointed that Ncuti Gatwa only had two seasons as that Varada Sethu is gone after just one.

This bugged me as well. I was very surprised in the last ep and the beginning of this one to see just how protective and loving Doctor and Belinda were being to poppy. But then by the end, only Belinda is the one that seems to care deeply for the child. The doctor is given a chance to make a farewell, but then he just leaves with (as I understood it) the implication that he is never going to come back and that he's been replaced by a human dad. It just confuses me why any of that needed to happen.

I think this seems to be a curse that almost every TV series is facing right now. Even for runaway critical and popular successes from companies with loads of funding (Thinking Wednesday from Netflix, all the Star Trek shows from Paramount-CBS, countless animated projects from HBO-Max-Whatever-they're-called-this-week) they seem unable to just commit to a production pipeline, everything ends up stalling, and it prevents the kind of success that the production companies wanted, all but ensuring they fail to meet expectations, as multi-year long waits for follow ups means that only the core fan group is going to want to follow up.

I don't know how you solve that, other than grabbing the executives by the shoulders and shaking them until they realise it's nonsense behaviour.

Adjusted to the initial sale value of the car - Less easy to cheat by not declaring income, and bigger cars (likely more expensive) that take up more space, pay more.

This episode contains a very powerful and pointed message, but as the episode reveals at the end, it will be lost on those who need to hear it most. Some people are too far gone and will refute the obvious, even when they on some level know it is true, and I struggle to fit myself into their mindset to understand that. Clearly a stab at conspiracy peddlers, toxic masculinity influencers, the press and politicians that use scapegoats, and all the others that prey on insecure people's worries and fear. They probably don't watch DW and wouldn't understand the point made here if they did, one can only hope this helps to immunise any kids watching against falling into these traps as they grow up.

Now, my thoughts on the plot here are not super positive.

First, Kate, what the hell? If Ruby needs to talk to someone, Kate needs to as well. The head of a global security org can't behave like that, even if it is part of some calculated effort to undo the damage done by a conspiracy peddler. The public reaction to "the person we think is making stuff up to control us and out us in harms way is actually willing to put us all in harms way and she's vindictive as hell, she just let that guy get his arm mauled off" being livestreamed should have gone the other way and made the whole situation and public attitudes to UNIT worse. At one point she says to tap the CCTV feeds into his livestream - if I understood that correctly, that means they could have just shut his feed down remotely from the beginning, and avoided this whole mess, if they'd just been a bit more proactive. Which brings me to my next grumble...

I really don't like the writing trope of "here's a super powerful group that exists to protect the world, only they have terrible OpSec so it's easy for people to infiltrate them". No-one, even the analysts (or was he a receptionist? I'm unclear what his job was) at UNIT would have access to all their staff's names and addresses, and any looking into that would necessarily have to be done with more than one person, just to be sure there was no ill intent. They certainly shouldn't be bale to remotely control the building's door locks. And if UNIT can screen out applicants like Conrad for being untrustworthy, how did they let someone who's into conspiracy sites in to begin with?

Now, positives:

I really enjoyed Gatwa's performance here. He was hardly in this episode, but that bit at the end really shows his range. He can go from happy and carefree to deadly serious in an instant.

Our monster of the week, the shreek, is an interesting idea. The exist out of our dimension and can pop in to attack those they've previously marked. I'm kind of getting Predator vibes from it's behaviour and looks. It does sort of beg the question why they wouldn't just attack and kill their victims right away. Waiting a year to juice up the taste of fear hormones can't have that much pay off, unless they live in a timestream that means they're not actually waiting that long.

I enjoyed seeing ruby again, following along Doctor's prior companions after they've left the Tardis is always nice. Seeing her breakdown and admit the need for help is refreshing, and honestly that should be more commonplace. I'm glad to see Ruby's family is staying strong, they can be there to support her. Though I suspect they might be even more dangerous to Conrad than Kate was if they ever got close to him.

Assorted notes:

• The prison below(?) the building reminds me of Torchwood a bit, they had one of those if I'm remembering right.
• Mrs Flood is a prison governess. A woman of many talents. I wonder if she dodges tax with all her paychecks.
• If the Doctor can land on planet earth, why couldn't he just find a spot and sort of "fast-forward" with the brakes on for a few years until 2025... I'm sure there's a timey wimey reason why that wouldn't work.
• It's been a long time since we've seen Trinity Wells presenting the news (I had to look that name up)
• UNIT using a cargo heli to move a dangerous alien that can disrupt electronics across London via the sky? No. Just... no. That's screaming "what could go wrong" :)

Absolutely. Screenshots of 3d desktop cube on ubuntu more than a decade ago is what taught me linux existed. It's an absolutely terrible and inefficient way to run desktop workspaces, but it hooked me all the same.

There's no need to be concerned because they're never going to build 100,000 new homes, never mind the 1.5M target. Building enough homes to house people would cause supply to meet demand and make the housing market "crash". And Labour will never upset those who've been tricked into thinking that home property is an investment.

I've downloaded some old PS2 era games. Some of the gameplay is quite dated, but I really enjoy the retro feel of the environments and graphics. Perfect photorealism isn't always necessary to enjoy a game. I've been playing Burnout and Ghost in the Shell SAC.

Just use PCGW for that https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Avowed#Game_data

This is a good change. I think we could be in a much better place if companies that owned both production and streaming were more open about licensing.

I really liked the facial expression animations in this episode. Its difficult to pull them off in 2D animation, but it really helped in this episode.

I've found it easier to use KDE to switch from windows as it feels like a more complete ecosystem that I'm familiar with. And it is pretty great, until I install one bad graphics driver and then I'm stuck in a terminal only session until I can fix it. At least windows has safe mode.

I'm surprised there was still a working spaceship left at the junkyard, I would have figured all the useful working parts would be scavenged.