I bet wikimedia commons is full of example pictures of that kind of stuff.
They may have a bit of an exhibitionist problem.

It is really concerning how that literally means something different when someone from the right says it.

Wait. Do you mean it can mean anything else?

I would not mind if these two games worked like Guild Wars 1 campaigns: you can play them separately as standalone games, but if you install both, they act as one game and you can play with the characters from one game in the maps with the other.

Individual privacy cannot be infringed. The measures against corporations are a good idea. The rest are only good for official accounts so public officials cannot be impersonated. For private individuals, accountability only needs to happen when they enact violence.

If they really wanted to protect any children, they would simply stop existing.