[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh interesting! I'll take a look into it thanks.

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 11 points 2 days ago

So basically there are 2 fascists in the room.

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks I'll take a look!

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago
[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago

I found Berty yesterday just after making this post. But as a neophyte in cryptography and everything, how am I supposed to know which one is better for my privacy ? (e.g. between Briar and Berty) Because right now the only thing that I have is what the apps are "telling" me so... Yeah I don't know how to chose.

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's the thing on iPhones right?

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah to be honest I don't even know how telegram became so popular in the "privacy-oriented world"

73
submitted 3 days ago by Ju135@lemmings.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

We all know Signal, Matrix, Telegram, SimpleX, etc... But if you can't access the internet you can't communicate. Pretty logic. But would it be possible, at least theoretically, to create an app that permits to message people even if the internet goes down?

It might be a dumb question I really have no idea to be honest.

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 7 points 3 days ago

This make the news only because it's going to chinese servers. Didn't see anything like that about ChatGPT or the one made by Google.

[-] Ju135@lemmings.world 4 points 3 days ago

I use OSMAnd. it just works so that's fine for me

Ju135

joined 3 days ago