Yes. Also folks who have never seen a container ship the size of a hotel pull up to the shipping pier in one of these "landlocked" states.

This one really shows Larson's willingness to put the work in to convey a silly joke with only the art details.

Yes. That's what AI actually adds - plausible deniability.

In addition to what else was shared: GrapheneOS now has fairly nuanced options for running apps.

Things that previously would not run at all, now often run fine - if granted additional permissions, such as the permission for the developer to be lousy at their job (various settings under "Exploit Protection").

Many apps run afowl of "Exploit Protections", but if you trust the app author, those settings can be disabled just for that app. Just realize that needing these settings generally means the app developer is bad at their job. If that's for an Indie Game - oh well. But when t's my bank...maybe I should reconsider who I trust with my money.)

This allows deciding how much to trust each app author.

I find it creepy that Google hasn't back-ported more of these privacy features into stock Android.

Specifically regarding the two app types you mention:

Regarding authenticators: I have yet to encounter one that fails on GrapheneOS. I have found some that only allow backups via Google services, which feels insane to me, anyway.

I wish someone had pointed me to Aegis sooner. Aegis is compatible with every MFA service I have tried it with, fully open source, available on F-Droid, and supports backing up to an encrypted file.

Regarding finance management apps: These have gotten super invasive, recently. Mine all work fine on GrapheneOS, but don't play nice with routine VPN usage, or with ever having location services disabled even for a minute.

The saving grace is that all the finance apps I use have had perfectly functional websites, which cannot be made invasive, the way an app can.

But when a mid-tier or entry level dev can do 60% of what a senior can do, it’ll be a great way to cut costs.

Same as how an entry level architect can build a building 60% as tall, and that'll last 60% as long, right?

Edit: And an entry level aerospace engineer with AI assistance will build a plane that's 60% as good at not crashing.

I'm not looking forward to the world I believe is coming...

Worth adding - let's all shop from unionized businesses whenever possible. There's strength in solidarity.

The left shoe trick - throwing my shoe in the car next to the kid - probably saved my kid's life more than once.

One kind of parents who have these tragedies are tired ones. Which is most parents with small children.

Edit: not relevant in this case, but I'll take any chance to advertise the shoe trick.

It might be possible Ferengi also have higher-than-human-average neuroplasticity and simply adapt easier - this might even aid in the on the job theory.

I think you're on to something.

Various Ferengi having a kind of genius foreign to Federation values is a recurring theme in DS9.

Nog, in particular, gets up to some antics that probably require some brilliance. I recall him hacking or circumventing things even early in the series.

Wow, I totally missed the part where Microsoft had a gun to your head.

Yes. Microsoft is good at hiding that part until it's too late to do much about it.

The answer is 2.

Cling to known humans who write their own code.

Snake oil salesmen always encourage the public to bet against the experts, with predictable results.

Someday ethically sourced AI can be used responsibly by trustworthy coders.

But the key is choosing to collaborate with trustworthy coders.

I used to always use Minecraft for this. Sure, they can't do everything immediately, but I put the game on peaceful and let them explore at their own pace.

I say "used to" because Luanti (formerly MineTest, an open source Minecraft Clone*) is finished and free.

(Okay, Luanti is a lot more than a Minecraft clone. But for this discussion that's all one needs to know.)

I've created lots of things. The moment I finish creating it, I sign over my IP rights in exchange for money for food, and never have a right to it again.

Without IP law, the thing I created would at least be in the commons where I can still legally use it.

(I agree with your point, some IP law could be better than none. But I'll assert that a total void of all IP law would be better than what we have now.

And we need to theaten to void it all, to get the current rights holders to negotiate. Frankly, I don't think they will. I think we need to void all IP law and then encourage the next generation to create some new IP law after we starve our current billionaires.)

(All this is in spite of my objection to being on the same side of any argument with Jack Dorsey. I have no illusion that his motives are pro-social.)