349
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Lake Superior is apparently not water

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 month ago

They should not have used the term "water access" when they meant "ocean access."

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago

It feels wrong, but landlocked typically refers to coastline on the ocean.

If you use navigability to the ocean, then the states on the Mississippi River also aren't landlocked.

There isn't a word for "c'mon, the great lakes have proper freighters and a coast guard presence. Michigan is obviously not landlocked".

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Not just the Mississippi. The US happens to have the most miles of navigable rivers and coastlines, as well as the most natural deep bays, of any country in the world.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Lake Superior....get over yourself.

[-] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Lake Mead is sadly now Lake Inferior.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

south of most of the great lakes doesn't seem to count.... oh I see now. The great beaches of Hudson Bay count as ocean access, no matter how little ships or beachgoers there are.

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 31 points 1 month ago

ITT: A bunch of people who have no idea what landlocked means.

[-] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes. Also folks who have never seen a container ship the size of a hotel pull up to the shipping pier in one of these "landlocked" states.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The quaint little hotels are another great reason to visit the landlocked states!

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

"What about the pond in my backyard? cHeCKmAtE"

[-] NecroParagon@midwest.social 28 points 1 month ago

Ah, Chicago, famously landlocked. I guess it's not the ocean. But you can get there from the lakes.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 11 points 1 month ago

Well that's true of nearly anywhere next to a lake or river, right? I think we'd count Manaus in Brazil ~~or Kazan in Russia~~ as being landlocked despite being next to large navigable rivers that go to the ocean

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Different definitions of the word "landlocked" have different meanings. There's one sense that's more relating to logistics, where a country/state/whatever is landlocked if it doesn't have something that functions like a port, not just a dock, or could if desired.
In that sense, Chicago is not landlocked because they have a port that can receive freight. Other places on the great lakes could although they might not due to whatever reason.

The other definition has more to do with controlling access to oceanic waters. Chicagos access to the ocean is at the mercy of Canada and all the states that control the st Lawrence seaway.

So if you're discussing economics you care that Bolivia can get freight shipping. If you're discussing geopolitics you care that Bolivia needs to form agreements with other countries to ensure that access remains uninterrupted.

[-] Vikthor@piefed.world 6 points 1 month ago

Kazan is next to a large navigable river that doesn't go to ocean :p

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

I remembered my geography wrong

~~It does go to the Black Sea, which then goes on to the Turkish Straits, the Mediterranean, the Strait of Gibraltar, and then the ocean though. I think if Chicago counts then Kazan has to~~

[-] Vikthor@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago

Volga goes to the Caspian sea, not the Sea of Azov(That would be Don).

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago

Oh shit, you're right! Misremembering on my part, thanks for the correction

[-] happydoors@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Michigan, surrounded by water on 3 sides gets landlocked status. Salty ocean must be the signifier

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I guess, but the great lakes are connected to the ocean via the st Lawrence seaway

[-] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

They are connected via a seaway that is controlled by other political entities.

Holy fuck this is the dumbest comment section in the history of Lemmy. "Nebraska isn't landlocked because it has a river."

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They are connected via a seaway that is controlled by other political entities.

By that definition, Gaza is landlocked

[-] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It effectively is, yes. It shouldn't be, but in practice it does not control its access to the open sea. Its sea "access" is basically limited to near-shore fishing.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Mississippi river: am I a joke to you?

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago

This isn't taking altitude into account at all. When the ocean starts coming to you, you don't want to be in Nebraska.

[-] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The mean elevation of the state is 2600 feet above sea level. The point of lowest elevation in the state is still 840 feet above sea level. According to National Geographic and the USGS, if all of the ice in the world melted, the rise in sea level would be approximately 215-230 feet. While, obviously, the second and third order effects are a different kettle of fish, from a submergence standpoint, Nebraska will be just fine.

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Everybody talks about ice melting. Nobody talks about the water in the ocean expanding from heating up. Prepare for water world, pal.

[-] redhorsejacket@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] ianhclark510 7 points 1 month ago

I will not accept this geography slander

Idaho has a seaport!

[-] porksnort@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I used to go hang out at the docks at the Port of Lewiston and listen to the longshorepersons tell tales of maritime sodomy. Then I would eat a large potato.

[-] Talaraine@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

You know what state used to be the bottom of the ocean? Nebraska. I think the state hates the ocean too xD

[-] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

What about if you don't want to live in North America?

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 8 points 1 month ago

Interesting idea, but the map clearly ends at the N. American borders. I'm not sure there's anything else out there.

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

IIRC from a Stand-Up Maths video from a while back, there are no countries that are triple-land-locked. Which is why he looked at US states.

[-] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Other countries have states too.

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think he gave a reason for only taking the time to look at US states (may have just been time) Matt Parker of Stand-Up Maths is from the UK, and I'm sure he's aware that other countries have states.

[-] oxysis 5 points 1 month ago

Wisconsin is definitely not double landlocked, direct access to the oceans via the Mississippi River and through the Great Lakes.

[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah but then Nebraska has access to the ocean via river too

How's about we just take it as "ocean coastline" and leave it at that

[-] Nemo@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

Can confirm: From South Dakota, have thalassophobia

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago

“Surfin’ in Nebraska” is apparently a euphemism for cluelessness.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They got dunes to surf in Nebraska.

[-] yuri@pawb.social 1 points 1 month ago

babe i WISH. best we get is redneck ski-slopes when it snows on terraces.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It was just a joke about the Sand Hills.

[-] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

shit man i’ve never been far out into central NE, i had no idea we have honest to god dunes! i’ve got some travel plans to make.

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

So uh... don't eat lobster in Nebraska?

[-] dan69@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Any kind of seafood.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

That or maybe Mongolia? Or further into Canada.

What point on earth is farthest from all oceans? I recall seeing a similar map around here recently, but it wasn’t with oceans.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
349 points (100.0% liked)

CartographyAnarchy

420 readers
1 users here now

A community for Cartographers with nothing left to lose.

Rules:

Don’t be awful Lemmy Guidelines Still Apply.

We are agents of chaos I’ve created this to be the alternative to the community I used to manage on the website that shalt not be named “mapporncirclejerk”

Live and let die Meme trends happen, so please don’t message mods asking to take down maps that are repetitive to a bit.

Reposts Vs. Covers Not all reposts are evil- if someone posts something that has been done years ago, it serves to bring old memes to the new users. I call these meme covers. However it can be done in excess which makes it a repost and spam. Mods will determine if a post is a cover or a repost.

No impersonating mods I can’t believe I had to make this rule.

No harassing mods on an appeal We can talk it out, and we will be acting in good faith when making decisions. If you disagree with a removal, you are free to message for clarification or to appeal by giving some added context.

Bans Bans will be set to a maximum of 365 days for humans, and a minimum of 365 years for bots. I believe people can change, so if you are banned for good reason, do know that it is not permanent, it is just a way to say “take time to grow and come back when you are ready”.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS