I think supporters of Israels actions don't see genocide itself as inherently wrong, but more that some of the people victimized by the Holocaust were wrongly targeted. This one is against the "right" people.
I've used it most extensively for non-professional projects, where if I wasn't using this kind of tooling to write tests they would simply not be written. That means no tickets to close either. That said, I am aware that the AI is almost always at best testing for regression (I have had it correctly realise my logic is incorrect and write tests that catch it, but that is by no means reliable) Part of the "hand holding" I mentioned involves making sure it has sufficient coverage of use cases and edge cases, and that what it expects to be the correct is actually correct according to intent.
I essentially use the AI to generate a variety of scenarios and complementary test data, then further evaluating it's validity and expanding from there.
I most often just get it straight up misunderstanding how the test framework itself works, but I've definitely had it make strange decisions like that. I'm a little convinced that the only reason I put up with it for unit tests is because I would probably not write them otherwise haha.
I think its most useful as an (often wrong) line completer than anything else. It can take in an entire file and just try and figure out the rest of what you are currently writing. Its context window simply isn't big enough to understand an entire project.
That and unit tests. Since unit tests are by design isolated, small, and unconcerned with the larger project AI has at least a fighting change of competently producing them. That still takes significant hand holding though.
Fifth, they could simply write checks to Treasury that help us finance global public goods.
You have to be fucking kidding me.
It's important to note that this is them moving in-development branches/features "behind closed doors", not making Android closed source. Whenever a feature is ready they then merge it publicly. I know this community tends to be filled with purists, many of whom are well informed and reasoned, but I'm actually totally fine with this change. This kind of structure isn't crazy uncommon, and I imagine it's mainly an effort to stop tech journalists analysing random in-progress features for an article. Personally, I wouldn't want to develop code with that kind of pressure.
This message was prepared ahead of time, along with one for Kamala Harris. I am sorry that this is the one we had to post. We will be monitoring the community closely over the next few days to redirect anyone in need to appropriate resources.
Bofa deez nuts
Naming your chatbot Arya(n) is a red flag
Cool party, stand for a lot of good things, including sex workers. I think they're called "reason" now
Their teachable moment is that plagiarism has consequences, and they earned that lesson entirely by themselves.
The Affinity suite is not an Adobe product.