Has it shriveled, or has it slightly declined? You can’t have both.
Click it!! Click the link!
Click the - It will shock you!! The . . . article! You won’t believe the, uh, amount of . . Shrivelage! They found!! One weird!
Cliiiiick iiiiiiiiit!!!
. . . This comment brought to you by Desperate News Organizations. DNO promises a thrilling hell-ride into fascism, or, possibly not, but only if you visit our many, many sponsors. Now! Go! ClickTheFrickingLink!! Aaaaaaaaaaa
Is this a copypasta? Because it’s pretty good.
What, like a turtle?
I’m not even sure this qualifies as any kind of decline. Surely this is within the margin of error.
It's evidence that progress really is marching forward one grave at a time.
It really doesn't. I'm sure their error margins are larger than 1%. It could totally be the democratic party that has shrunk and the republican party has grown if the error is bad enough (which it almost certainly isn't, but I'm trying to make a point). I'm not clicking that article though. I'm not going to justify that headline.
The fact that the base has only "slightly declined" is incredibly bad news, considering that the Republicans' shift towards the deep end of fascism has been way more than "slight!"
It may show the Republican voters base is declining, or it may show that those who vote Republican are refusing to answer the pollsters questions honestly.
To be fair they could be legitimately honest there. If I was asked that question I wouldn't claim Democrat because I'm further left than the old guard Dems and the party at a national level. I would never vote republican.
...or it may show that neither party is growing but Republicans are dying faster.
Lots of Republicans lived free without a mask or vaccine and are dead now
Don't care.
Vote.
There was a 2% decrease over 4 years. 30% to 28%. Hardly "shriveling."
And that 2% drop was probably people who will vote for Trump but didn't want the survey taker to know if
The 2% are the dead Republicans that refused to wear a mask to "own the libs"
Or just old bastards who have been voting for Reaganomics for forty years and can't figure out why the rich get richer and they can't afford healthcare.
Can we just lock journalists in cages until they memorize a gradeschool dictionary please?
maybe they were in the pool
Gee, maybe convincing them vaccines are the devil had negative repercussions
Great Deals on Used Harleys!
Act now and receive TWO free vintage wraparound sunglasses!
You mean "died." All the COVID conspiracies were from the right and they didn't wear masks, sucked down horse dewormer, and travelled like they won the lottery. They asked for this, they DEMANDED this.
FAFO is what comes to mind
It kinda looks like the elephant is wearing jeans.
Agreed, we need to be talking about this more.
Unironically worth much more of my attention than the article. I need more elephants in jeans. Are there equivalent donkeys in jeans? If not, let’s call out the rampant media bias and do something about it (specifically making more images of animals wearing jeans).
2% is margin of error territory
What matters most is not what they publicly say, but how they privately vote.
So many people said Trump made them feel safe to show their true feelings. People are staying racist and fascist, just learning to keep it quiet again
i dont think the landslides are uncommon.
the whole tiktok fiasco could trigger anger in genZ into becoming politically active.
could also somehow still fall into regressive republican hands too. imho
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News