347
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Disinformation is the deliberate use of lies to manipulate people, whether to extract profit or to advance a political agenda. Its unwitting accomplice, misinformation, is spread by unknowing dupes who repeat lies they believe to be true. In America today, both forms of falsehood are distorting our perception of reality.

In a democracy, the people need a shared set of facts as a basis to debate and make decisions that advance and secure their collective interests. Differences of opinion, and even propaganda, have always existed in the United States, but now, enemies of democracy are using disinformation to attack our sovereign right to truthful information, intellectual integrity, and the exercise of the will of the people. Online disinformation is particularly insidious because of its immediacy, its capacity to deceive, and its ability to reach its target.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ekybio@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago

Conservatives never have facts and reason on their side, so they just drop them and stop caring for reality.

Speaking the truth and being right-wing are always mutually exclusive!

[-] rhacer@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago
[-] Balinares@pawb.social 10 points 7 months ago

Not sure why you're being downvoted. Wasn't it shown that e.g. Russia is targeting our side just as heavily?

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

The left don't fall for it as easily and they don't spread it as virulently, and when they do it's for what? Policies that generally benefit and are agreed on by enormous majorities of real people.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] knightly@pawb.social 8 points 7 months ago

Liberals too, yeah.

Rational people don't go into politics.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

People that believe in liberty have to go into politics if we are to maintain any of our liberty. Get your propaganda out of here.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

"People that believe in liberty"

Like I said, rational people don't go into politics.

Liberty is not an obtainable goal but an ideal, defined as "the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views".

This idealistic principle is fundamentally incompatible with Democratic Society, because my liberty to breathe clean air is an oppressive restriction to those who want the liberty to pollute it and vice versa.

Any political idealist who promises to support "liberty" without clarification should be treated with suspicion, as that sort of rhetoric is only useful for distracting from more specific policy goals.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Eh, there's a difference between believing in liberty, and believing in all the liberty.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

How's that ceasefire deal coming lol?

[-] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago
[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Disinformation comes from both sides. Don't let yourself be propagandized into defending a political party to the death.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

The vast majority of Republicans believe things that are factually untrue.

The same doesn't apply to any other political demographic in the US. There is significantly more right wing grift out there than lib grift cuz libs are probably more intelligent.

Literally every single right wing commentator out there used to be a lib until they realized Republicans were dumber so it was easier to dupe them out of their money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

Right wing disinformation is tearing America apart.

[-] goatmeal@midwest.social 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Both sides have pretty bad disinformation going on. Left is just more polished about it, I'm guessing because their demographic is on average much more educated. Right wing stuff you can at least immediately see right through.

Israel coverage from the main stream left has been stunning

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

LOL there's always a both sideser in here. I have this conversation with my brother weekly. He seems to think that the next time will convince me.

[-] goatmeal@midwest.social 14 points 7 months ago

I mean the right is obviously much worse, straight up lies vs careful omission. Not trying to defend that since it kinda goes without saying around here.

For this tho when one of the fastest/widest margin bills to pass congress this past year is blocking foreign tech media because it might influence elections, while our domestic tech companies have already been proven to do that over and over for the past few elections it just shows neither side actually cares about misinformation, just controlling it for themselves

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

It’s specifically that they don’t want the Chinese government to have access to the data. They don’t care a bit about privacy though.

[-] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

One side is backed by fiction and one side is backed by US intelligence? And where is this 'proof' domestic tech companies illegally influence American elections? Let's see it bub.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

And where is this ‘proof’ domestic tech companies illegally influence American elections?

God it's impossible to keep up with people who are obsessed with defending the problems within the Democratic party. Is this not what happened in the 2016 general election now? I can't keep up with the shifting narratives used to excuse the failures of establishment Democrats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Your comment literally started with "both sides"... Just ZERO self awareness.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Disinformation from establishment Democrats is enabling the Republican party. We can hate Republicans all we like but establishment Democrats are trying to walk this tightrope between fascism and worker empowerment. Every time they lose their balance they shift to the right. We will be unable to defeat the Republican party until we root out the corruption of the Democratic party.

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Democrats are not leftists

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Name one leftist show on a main stream channel.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

It's the disinformation alright, but it's the disinformation from billionaires dividing us so they can get away with all the wealth while we fight for scraps. The call is coming from inside the house.

[-] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

This is it. I have been chastised for suggesting that many social problems are red herrings to distract us from the one true problem, that it's us versus them. Until that problem is solved, nothing else can be.

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 7 points 7 months ago

it drives me nuts, I've got formerly lefty friends who drifted right due to disillusionment with their pet issue. one began their drift via the antivax movement, their personal grudge against the medical system has them now embracing every far right conspiracy out there. so yeah, I believe folks find what they seek, and those who are doing the pulling have figured out the exact temperature of smoke to blow up people's asses.

[-] SexWithDogs@infosec.pub 5 points 7 months ago

If you can't turn someone red, just make them a single issue voter.

Voting blue can hurt sometimes as a gun-owning Texan, but I do what I must. I didn't always have that mentality.

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

serious question, why does it hurt? I'm not a gun owner but I don't see much that the left is doing that is actually endangering your rights. I do see a lot of fearmongering from the right but as far as I can tell it's entirely bloviating. I mean, the bluest of blue areas still have extremely liberal gun laws and what I see being proposed from the left is more or less common sense reforms. Obviously there are outliers but I don't see that agenda having much success. In fact, I have some very strong gun rights friends who are entirely and proudly progressive.

[-] SexWithDogs@infosec.pub 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hang out in enough blue spaces to see the cries for renewed bans on particular styles of guns. A lot of the stuff I own in Texas would already be a felony to own in NY and Cali.

There also appears to be a variety of definitions for "common sense" gun laws, and it seems to depend largely on an individual's locality. Universal background checks is a no-brainer, but I'd like to keep my semi-auto rifle and standard capacity mags.

Besides, everyone knows it's actually handguns that are responsible for a vast majority of violent crimes involving firearms, which potentially makes them next up on the chopping block once the precedent is set by the first ban of a style of firearm that's rarely used in violent gun crimes rarely in comparison.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TengoHipo@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago

It’s usually feelings over facts. Or I just love when they tell you to Google it. Then you do and prove them wrong and then they tell you that’s the wrong site lol Republicans really made the uneducated loud and annoying.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

My dad was trying to tell me that the COVID vaccine is dangerous, so he googled it, sent me a blog with the Google link in it, then got upset when I found that the source that blogger used said "those who are able to be vaccinated help those who cannot be vaccinated." This was all because of my and my wife's request to get the vaccine to meet our 3 month old.

He didn't like that I did actual research on his partisan blog to prove him wrong.

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 19 points 7 months ago

For it to work, people first need to be uneducated and indoctrinated. That's the real issue.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago

This is simply not true, and this kind of belief--that misinformation only works on "other people"--is part of the problem.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

People have a desire to be correct in their beliefs, and they have found comfort in disinformation instead of having to change or reflect on dated world views.

They aren't being tricked, they actively seek and embrace the disinformation.

[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Counterpoint: idiots who never question things they want to hear are tearing America apart.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago
[-] Simon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 7 months ago

Shouldn't have made propaganda legal then, fuckers.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

I guess you can't put the blame on that on one individual person, but if you could it would be Ronald fucking Reagan.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

I mean, folks from Time Magazine suddenly deciding misinformation is a problem...

https://time.com/time-person-of-the-year-2016-donald-trump/

For all of Trump’s public life, tastemakers and intellectuals have dismissed him as a vulgarian and carnival barker, a showman with big flash and little substance. But what those critics never understood was that their disdain gave him strength. For years, he fed off the disrespect and used it to grab more tabloid headlines, to connect to common people. Now he has upended the leadership of both major political parties and effectively shifted the political direction of the international order. He will soon command history’s most lethal military, along with economic levers that can change the lives of billions. And the people he has to thank are those he calls “the forgotten,” millions of American voters who get paid by the hour in shoes that will never touch these carpets—working folk, regular Janes and Joes, the dots in the distance.

And that's not even touching its hagiographies of various Evangelical ministers from Billy Graham (1954, 1993, 1996, 2007) and Jimmy Swaggart and Jim & Tammy Faye Bakker (both in the glorious year of 1987). An assortment of nine Catholic Bishops scored nine covers (the last in 1966), and of course eight Popes have worn the red frame more thirty-three times. And then there's the straight-up pandering Jesus-y editions.

Today it's going to be "Has misinformation gone too far?!" and tomorrow its going to be Inside the Uranium Underworld: Dark Secrets, Dirty Bombs and another excuse to march to war.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

When routine bites hard and ambitions are low

And resentment rides high but emotions won't grow

And we're changing our ways, taking different roads

Then disinformation will tear us apart again

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago
[-] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

The irony of this being posted on Lemmy.

[-] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

My popcorn is ready.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
347 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS