553
submitted 8 months ago by starman@programming.dev to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Album@lemmy.ca 199 points 8 months ago

Damn Lemmy users are no different from Reddit. Don't read anything. Take anything you did read out of context. Be sure to rage post your own ignorance so we can all read about it.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 83 points 8 months ago

You can help by clarifying the article

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 113 points 8 months ago

There are a bunch of free channels on the internet that some TVs can just stream without a dedicated app. These channels are supported by ads like cable/whatever channels, but not locked behind a subscription. VLC is supporting whatever formats they use to allow (or make it easier; IDK) people to watch them if they want.

The other part is that they're working on web assembly to allow sites to use VLC as their embedded video player.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

I’m so conflicted about web assembly. I’m a web developer and I think it’s going to be amazing eventually but 20% of me thinks it’s going to be a security nightmare and require a decade of fuck ups to reach its potential.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm mostly worried about how much less open this will make the web for simple local hacking. I often add small features to webapps I use by injecting code and hooking into their systems (when it's not an app with open source, where I send a PR instead - and if I can work around issues I do contact the owners with a working fix).

This will be much harder with WebAssembly. Sure, there'll be decompilers in time - but in the time it takes me to change a small piece of behaviour in such cases, I can add multiple features in the current JS environment, even if the code is obfuscated.

[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm more concerned that the web will get even slower and bloated. We are already seeing the first frameworks that ship a webassembly .NET runtime, Python runtime, JVM, ... . I kinda fear that in 10 years when you visit a site you need to download runtime xyz in version abc for the 1000th time. All because some people or companies just can not be bothered to learn any new technology.

[-] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

require a decade of fuck ups to reach its potential.

That's quicker than people, heck I'm going on my 3rd decade and still not at my potential. Or so I like to tell myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shinnoodles@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

He shouldn't have to, the point is read before commenting about a clickbait headline. If he has to spell it out that only furthers his point.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Yes, he has no responsibility to explain it. But if he would like to help anyways, he could.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

Damn Lemmy users are no different from Reddit

We’re do you think Lemmy got all its users?

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Where do you think Lemmy got all its users?

Fixed that for you.

/le reddit larping

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

Was this comment meant for another thread? I'm confused

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] requiem@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago

Slightly wondering whether this is a roundabout way of creating Ad-Free YouTube playback capabilities. “Hey community, we are adding support for ad enabled streams. Would be a shame if you hated that so much you wrote some ad blocking plugins.”

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 20 points 8 months ago

Ad-Free YouTube playback capabilities.

The last time I tried, VLC could already do that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

Very generous of you to assume that adding native support for advertising is a move to protect users from advertising...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago

You can already watch youtube ad-free with VLC...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 59 points 8 months ago

This is bad news. FAST streaming is an ad-riddled nightmare. VLC already supports streaming video just fine. Native support for FAST services just means native support for ads.

VLC already includes support for IPTV streams and M3Us. If you want to load FAST channels, you can do that now using a playlist from here: https://github.com/iptv-org/iptv

You'll even get an ad-free / ad-reduced experience this way. FAST providers like Pluto and Tubi rebroadcast some TV channels and inject their own targeted ads. If you pipe the video stream into VLC, you'll just see "commercial break in progress" filler video instead of commercials. Try it out with a local news station, they are all almost completely add free this way.

Enjoy this while you can, I guess...

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 33 points 8 months ago

I mean it's just another format they'll be supporting. If you don't want to watch in that format, don't.

[-] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 months ago

FAST isn't a format, it's an integration. The format is streaming mpeg like everything else.

If FAST services want to be a part of VLC, they can just write their own extension.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 49 points 8 months ago

Yay VLC!
From the tail end of the short, and easy to read article: If you want an early look at the upcoming changes with VLC 4.0, you can download (https://nightlies.videolan.org/?ref=news.itsfoss.com) the latest nightly release from the official website or the latest “Edge” build from the Snap store (https://snapcraft.io/vlc?ref=news.itsfoss.com). VLC 4.0 (Early Build) (Snap Store) (https://snapcraft.io/vlc?ref=news.itsfoss.com)

[-] OrangeCorvus@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Feels like the 4.0 version has been in alpha/beta for years now? I thought they abandoned the idea.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Yes, it's been actual years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] darganon@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago

Some of the new stuff looks cool, and for all of these knee-jerk reactionaries... optional.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 39 points 8 months ago

plans to support ad-supported online media streams

Why are they saying it like it's something good and exciting?

rewriting the whole core of VLC for the 4.0 release which will see a new interface

Where have we see it before? It's basically the classic scenario where popular software/service makes a complete chnage of design nobody asked for and it fails miserably. I recommend everyone to make a backup of the installer of the last version before this release...

[-] federalreverse@feddit.de 75 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I really don't see the what the fuss is in this thread. The source does make it seem a bit nefarious, but even so, it appears the changes in VLC amount to adding support for a streaming format and adding a channel listing of some sort.

FAST is simply a streaming format. Whether to run ads is an individual decision of each channel.

If I can have a streaming client that can play certain streams versus one that can't, I'll obviously pick the former. (Unless they employ a DRM scheme which does weird things to my devices but it doesn't appear that's part of the discussion here.)

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yep, here's the section

When he was talking about that, he also shared that they plan to add support for FAST channels and other kinds of ad-supported online media streams that would allow users to watch ad-supported movies, TV shows, and more.

However, he also clarified that plans for this were not finalized yet, and if it were to happen, it would be optional for VLC users.

.

It does when you consider that there are over 1,500 FAST channels in the US alone, plus countless others around the globe, with the number still growing.

They already support other forms of streams, why not this. It would be weirder if they chose to not support it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

I mean, the guy who made vlc hasn't charged for like 15 years now.

For most people the only time they open VLC is to view a file locally. I'm surprised they're not also trying to become more like plex/jellyfin then pivot to ad supported streaming

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

Didn't it already have that for years? Sounds like they're 'just' adding support for signing in/ads

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

I'd rather be able to stream a file from my PC via VLC to other people with VLC.

If that's already a thing, then I guess I just gotta figure it out...

[-] doublenom@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

VLC support RTMP, streaming a live feed like twitch. https://wiki.videolan.org/RTMP/

VLC also support reading from network https://wiki.videolan.org/Documentation:Play_HowTo/Basic_Use_0.9/Opening_modes/#Opening_a_Network

You are also able to generate a stream through multiple interfaces though I couldn't find how. Still, it is officially reported as being possible. https://www.videolan.org/streaming-features.html

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] neosheo@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 8 months ago

I believe you can set up a http stream and then have others connect to it

[-] epoch@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

mpv is our saviour.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago
[-] maiskanzler@feddit.de 40 points 8 months ago

Dude, they are not starting their own ad supported streaming service. They are merely adding dupport for one more streaming protocol that happens to be used for that. If these services were using RTSP for their streams, they'd already be supported. This is absolutely in line with VLC's swiss army knife-approach.

Otherwise, new GUI sounds good to me. The old one is proven but a bit clunky.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] maiskanzler@feddit.de 14 points 8 months ago

Changes are looking good, great to see it is still very active!

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Fork incoming.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

I swore this was already a feature. I remember years ago (15+) I was able to play YouTube videos on it.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

The new feature is for FAST, which is a type of IPTV stream. Imagine something akin to a TV channel guide, like Samsung’s and Roku’s built in streams.

And the “ad supported” bit is misleading; The channels are supported by ads, and run them as part of their programming. It’s not VLC showing ads before you’re allowed to stream the video, like YouTube. Just like regular TV channels, where they have commercial breaks.

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 8 months ago

The new feature is for FAST specifically.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
553 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48132 readers
454 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS