943

Warner Bros. Discovery is telling developers it plans to start “retiring” games published by its Adult Swim Games label, game makers who worked with the publisher tell Polygon. At least three games are under threat of being removed from Steam and other digital stores, with the fate of other games published by Adult Swim unclear.

The media conglomerate’s planned removal of those games echoes cuts from its film and television business; Warner Bros. Discovery infamously scrapped plans to release nearly complete movies Batgirl and Coyote vs. Acme, and removed multiple series from its streaming services. If Warner Bros. does go through with plans to delist Adult Swim’s games from Steam and digital console stores, 18 or more games could be affected.

News of the Warner Bros. plan to potentially pull Adult Swim’s games from Steam and the PlayStation Store was first reported by developer Owen Reedy, who released puzzle-adventure game Small Radios Big Televisions through the label in 2016. Reedy said on X Tuesday the game was being “retired” by Adult Swim Games’ owner. He responded to the company’s decision by making the Windows PC version of Small Radios Big Televisions available to download for free from his studio’s website.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] melmi 335 points 9 months ago

So this is just a thing now? Removing media from the world?

They found out it works so now it's gonna become a trend.

[-] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 95 points 9 months ago

That was always the point of digitizing the world. It's crazy to me that people didn't see it coming, but it's nice that people are actually taking notice now.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 115 points 9 months ago

But digitizing does have some benefits, like bit-for-bit archival, usually by a "third party"

[-] ogmios@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago

Sure there are good uses for it, but not the way we've been aggressively shoving it into every space we possibly can, consequences be damned.

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 95 points 9 months ago

I disagree, digitizing is what is saving a lot of the media. You can save hundreds of thousands of hours of videos and many games in a single 20TB drive today. You couldn't do that without digital technology.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago

In fact, the lack of digital storage is why, to name an infamous example, the only recordings of most episodes of the original Doctor Who show are from the private collections of viewers: the BBC, lacking both funding and storage space, were forced to record new content over episodes with no backup.

I hate it when luddites pine for the days of my childhood and early adulthood where the storage, transfer, and use of every single type of media was so damn impractical compared to now.

It's like wanting to go back to horses and walking being the only forms of land transportation because some trains are loud 🤦

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah, it's bizarre reading people say they want physical games because if it's not physical steam might remove it. Bro just download it and don't delete it from your device, steam is offering a re-download service but nothing is stopping users from just downloading the game and keeping it in their disks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Weve lost far more pre-digital copies of games than we have digital.

Physical media breaks and degrades, once they stop selling it in a store and your copy doesnt work anymore its gone forever.

Like you’re just so utterly wrong it’s mind boggling to see your comment upvoted by so many.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 22 points 9 months ago

It was the point of software as a service and DRM

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 26 points 9 months ago

They've been trying for at least 30 years, probably closer to 50-60 TBH.

One of the concepts they(RIAA/MPAA) were looking into for the entire CD/DVD era was the idea of a time-limited disk that would only work for a short period of time before becoming unreadable.

By the time they got it working, Steam was already a thing and distribution through physical media was on the way out.

Now they control movie theaters through streaming. They stream the movies to the theaters, the theaters rarely get physical or even digital copies anymore. It just gets streamed right to the projector.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

At least the developer for Small Radios Big Televisions is handing it out for free now. Looks like a pretty decent game.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago

The developer of another game distributed by WB, Fist Puncher, commented on the Ars Technica story about this.

Found it, it's the "Promoted Comment" now.

therealmattkain I'm one of the creators and developers of Fist Puncher which was also published by Adult Swim on Steam. We received the same notice from Warner Bros. that Fist Puncher would be retired. When we requested that Warner Bros simply transfer the game over to our studio's Steam publisher account so that the game could stay active, they said no. The transfer process literally takes a minute to initiate (look up "Transferring Applications" in the Steamworks documentation), but their rep claimed they have simply made the universal decision not to transfer the games to the original creators.

This is incredibly disappointing. It makes me sad to think that purchased games will presumably be removed from users' libraries. Our community and our players have 10+ years of discussions, screenshots, gameplay footage, leaderboards, player progress, unlocked characters, Steam achievements, Steam cards, etc. which will all be lost. We have Kickstarter backers who helped fund Fist Puncher (even some who have cameo appearances in the game) who will eventually no longer be able to play it. We could just rerelease Fist Puncher from our account, but we would likely receive significant backlash for relaunching a game and forcing users to "double dip" and purchase the game again (unless we just made it free).

Again, this is really just disappointing. It seems like more and more the videogame industry is filled with people that don't like and don't care about videogames. All that to say, buy physical games, make back-ups, help preserve our awesome industry and art form. March 7, 2024 at 12:51 am

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2024/03/its-kind-of-depressing-wb-discovery-pulls-indie-game-for-business-changes/

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mudle@lemmy.ml 192 points 9 months ago

Time, and time again, they prove how piracy is literally THE only option when it comes to preserving media.

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 167 points 9 months ago

Whoever takes games down without license problems is a gigantic dickhead and makes no sense, even from a economic perspective its idiotic.

[-] Redward@yiffit.net 57 points 9 months ago

That’s because they are gonna succeed where others have failed, lunch their own game store /s

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 141 points 9 months ago

Products no longer available to buy should fall into public domain.

WB are an absolute cancer. Suicide Squad fails spectacularly due to being a multiplayer live service game that nobody asked for, and their immediate response is to go all in on multiplayer live service games.

Because heaven forbid the executives could be fucking wrong.

[-] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago

If I can’t buy it, I will pirate it with zero moral issues.

I own over 1000 DVDs and a couple hundred BluRays, but will pirate anything that gets removed from streaming or isn’t available in my region for some shitty licensing reasons.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

If you have a legitimate copy of Dogma (1999), put it into a fireproof safety box. That is a collectors item already, as they pulled production of the DVD copies after a rather limited run.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 101 points 9 months ago

... why? They're complete products that just sit there and make money for almost no effort

[-] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 41 points 9 months ago

I think we're in a slow burning culture war that is trying to erase everything but one single mindset of thought.

Discovery channel felt it early, and now that same sentiment is spreading everywhere. Cut away the vibrant ecosystem for a single channel, controllable narrative.

And it's across every fuckdamn media.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 96 points 9 months ago

Cool, then they won't have any problems with everybody downloading them for free.

If they want to cry about lost revenue, then they can turn around and sue themselves for making the games unavailable

[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 91 points 9 months ago

Piracy has been legitimized by corporate lies about the free market.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 86 points 9 months ago

I honestly don't understand the math of not releasing movies and un-releasing games. People say tax purposes but I'd think streaming is essentially pure profit, hard to imagine not being able to make 20% of your money back or whatever credit you get for taxes.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 43 points 9 months ago

if you write it off as a tax write off you get to lie about "expected viewership" rather than actual viewership

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kuraitengai@programming.dev 35 points 9 months ago

Think of it like Russian nesting dolls.

You got the production company that pays $100 million to make a movie. The production company is owned by a studio. Production company licenses the movie to the studio that owns it for $200 million. But it’s all the same ownership and no money changed hands. It’s just on paper. So now the $100 million movie cost $200 million. Then the studio licenses out the movie to the marketing company, which the studio also owns, for $300 million. Again no money changed hands and the value is all on paper.

Do that a couple more times and that’s how a movie that literally cost $100 million and made $500 million at the box office “barely broke even”.

Might be off on the layers, but I heard that description of movie accounting years ago.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

Gotta get you hooked on the new drug that doesn't have royalties they have to pay out.

They're looking forward to all the AI generated crap, and the newer stuff they've already fucked the creators over in their contracts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 76 points 9 months ago

This practice feels like something that should be illegal. Effectively it is destroying art that hundreds or thousands of people worked hard to make, for the sake of fiddling the books of the owning company that commissioned it.

If you "write it off" to be worth zero, it should either become freely available abandonware, or can be claimed as the intellectual property of those that worked on it. Otherwise it is evident that there is some value to be had and therefore tax fraud to claim it has none.

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 29 points 9 months ago

I agree with you. If a company writes off something in order to make it with zero, then that thing should immediately fall into the public domain.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

You would have to have another law that says that anything significantly devalued must be able to be purchased for the stated value. Otherwise they will just say it's worth $1.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 69 points 9 months ago

Zazlov: Gets $223M annual salary

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 15 points 9 months ago

If he gets $223M a year for being a detriment to society, I should be getting at least $446M for being relatively neutral.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 62 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Luckily Steam will keep Duck Game in my library, but I dread the moment Valve leadership changes. Steam has existed for 20 years, and I naively hope I'll still be able to play my games in 40 years on my Steck Deck.

[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Well, since you retain a license to the content until you or valve closes your account, you should be covered.

According to their own personal Steam Subscriber Agreement, you only forfit licenses when you end your subscription (like EA Play) or when the main service contract ends (close your account).

Although they may try, but then you can still sue for breach of contract.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

That's as things may be now. What we have consistently seen is that company's can often change their policy whenever they want. It's happened too many times already to think the current lunch is future proof

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago

Yet another reason piracy is right and just

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 48 points 9 months ago

I'm waiting for the day when actors and game devs refuse to work on things owned by WB because the risk of wasting their time and efforts is too damn high.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

it makes sense that failing business would want to remove digital assets hosted somewhere else that can't possibly lose them money

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

FUUUUUUCK DAVID ZASLAV!

He is not only hiding things people enjoy watching and playing, he is hiding history.

Imagine how much less we would know about Elizabethan England if all of Shakespeare's plays were lost to all time.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 38 points 9 months ago
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I kind of get retiring video IPs to save on residual payments, but games which are pay per download should always be revenue neutral at best. This just reeks of shitty culture war rebranding.

[-] N00dle@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

My hatred of WB goes back to when the purposely released a completely broken Arkham Knight game on PC. It has only grown more recently, I really wanted to watch that Acme vs Coyote movie. I hope to see a leak one day maybe.

[-] OneCardboardBox@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 9 months ago

...and of course Duck Game never got released on GoG

Fuck this greedy bullshit

[-] electricprism@lemmy.ml 31 points 9 months ago

They Want To Erase History.

They are Burning The Books.

[-] nieceandtows@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

Disney should sue WB for their Thanos imitation

[-] adhdplantdev@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

Tax codes and capitalism at it finest. Companies gonna company

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

As if I'd need any additional reason to not buy Warner Bros games. So stupid of them.

[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Not sure whether they will remove it entirely or just delist it. I love Steam and the convenience of it and the majority of my games are on Steam. But this is why we should be able to own our games. You never know when your favorite game decides to do something like this.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 27 points 9 months ago

I don't think any games have been completely removed from Steam. In cases like this, they stop new purchases, but anyone who already has it keeps it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
943 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers
176 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS