385
submitted 8 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 133 points 8 months ago

This is a loss for everyone. Fuck these clowns.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago

Trump judge.

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 71 points 8 months ago

Cryptobros and crypto miners are some of the most worthless people in the world. Just a waste of oxygen and resources.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

That's exactly who billionaires who have yachts and private jets want you to take your anger out on. Good job falling for it.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 24 points 8 months ago

Jokes on you, I have enough anger for both!

[-] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

won't someone think of the poor speculators

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bobmighty@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I feel exactly the same about the billionaires.

[-] Fly4aShyGuy@lemmy.one 15 points 8 months ago
[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

For speaking the truth? Justify Bitcoin minings worth to society and the cost on our planet it causes. Gimme

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Fixes OPEC cause it allows international trade without the dollar, thus decoupling us from petro dollar.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 months ago

There are much better ways for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Oneser@lemm.ee 56 points 8 months ago

Everyone is a bit shit here (including whoever came up with that title...). No one "won" anything here.

DoE wanted to use "emergency" measures to survey miner's energy use, which is likely outside of the scope of the original intent of such powers (which appears to be why the judge granted a temporary restraining order?).

The Bitcoin miner's claim the data release would cause "irreparable harm to their business..." If that's not an admission of guilt, then I don't know what is.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

temporary restraining order?

It's just a type of pretrial injunction. You need to show that irreparable harm would come if the DOE did this. It's helpful to have the case look like you'd win. Since the judge already said that it looks like they'd win, he'd likely extend it all the way to the end of the trial.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/temporary_restraining_order

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Trev625@lemm.ee 37 points 8 months ago

This is dumb but only because we don't worry about energy use any other time. Tons of places in my city keep all their lights on 24/7 unnecessarily, we all are sitting on a "useless" social media, video games and movies and music are all energy uses. I don't want the government to start limiting energy use on things it deems unimportant. Who gets to decide what counts? Just implement a carbon tax and energy use will go down if people don't want to pay. We don't need to police everyone's usage, we just need the cost to actually reflect the externalities.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

We could just solve the problem the capitalist way and just charge businesses extra for their power usage. That'll get them to care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 6 points 8 months ago

So true. These fu**ing schools keeping their lights on the whole night and vacations, with their old lamps, while people like me measure their lamps and turn everything off...

Also the amount of 4K or more useless data transfer, ads, unnecessary youtube videos where there could be only audio (if they made that free, you can use any FOSS client and do the same)

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

With Carbon tax only the rich win, we need carbon credits

[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

No it’s really really easily to implement taxation that’s not regressive.

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

A progressive tax that means the biggest users pay the most would probably be ideal (but then that's mostly true in every situation)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sim642@lemm.ee 34 points 8 months ago

keep mum about energy use

Whose mum?

[-] Scribbd@feddit.nl 9 points 8 months ago

There is a "Your mum" joke in there.

Your mum is so fat, that bitcoin miners litigated to keep abusing her power grid.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

US headline

"keep mum"

There is one impostor among us

[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

Probably ai generated

[-] Silentiea@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Mum as in quiet is uncommon but not unheard of in the us. Probably more common than mum for mother, anyway.

"Mum's the word"

[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Time to call an emergency meeting

[-] dgmib@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

The economic drivers of Bitcoin mining make it so that the cost of the electricity needed to mine a Bitcoin will always be just a bit less than the value of a Bitcoin.

Every time speculators hype up the value of Bitcoin the amount of money wasted on electricity increases.

Bitcoins are mined at a preset rate of 6.25 bitcoins every 10 minutes. Which does at least get cut in half every few years. But this waste of energy is going to continue so long as there’s a market for Bitcoin.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 14 points 8 months ago

Somehow Ethereum 2 exists with Proof of Stake and everybody is still using Bitcoin. That tells me that nobody important (for this context) cares about wasted electricity.

[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's more that noone cares about the actual use cases of crypto and are just using it as speculative gambling.

Bitcoin is the literal equivalent of a horse and carriage while cars exist. If any crypto survives it should be the proof of stake crypto not the badly designed bitcoin (noting of course, for its time it was amazingly innovative, just that it's no longer actually useful).

Not to mention the whole design flaw that it's meant to be completely private/anonymous but ironically is one of the most public and traceable things ever created.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not to mention the whole design flaw that it's meant to be completely private/anonymous but ironically is one of the most public and traceable things ever created.

Bitcoin was never meant to be that, people were/are just idiots.

Monero on the other hand... Something made possible because Bitcoin came first.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

FYI there's no such thing as "Ethereum 2." It's just called "Ethereum."

And you're right, every time these mainstream articles mention the power consumption of crypto, they never mention ETH. Weird.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 months ago

Because crypto is only used by people who want to get rich out of it.

There is no money to be found in Ethereum 2, at least not like with Bitcoin.

So if the userbase is full of selfish pricks, then they wouldn't care about energy use either.

[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 17 points 8 months ago

[…] use roughly as much electricity as all of the nation’s home computers combined

Bitcoin mining also risks stressing out the power grid in Texas, a crypto hub in the US where the state’s grid operator has paid Riot more than $31 million in energy credits to curb its electricity use during heatwave-induced demand spikes. Bitcoin mining has also brought sputtering fossil fuel power plants back to life and raised electricity costs for some residents in New York.

It's clear why the survey is necessary.

Why did they make it an emergency survey in the first place? Is there no "normal" survey alternative?

[-] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Genuine question: If I use a cryptocurrency such as Monero for its privacy benefits (only for spending, not as an investment), am I indirectly making crypto mining more profitable and hurting the environment?

ps. I don't use any crypto yet.

Edit: actually I don't care that much about private money. What if I were to just use some crypto because it's convenient? Would that be bad?

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 months ago

There are so many things we interact with that hurt the environment that I wouldn’t take too much personal blame if I were you. The big time miners are the ones using the electricity, and they could use their profits to invest in renewable sources for their mining. They just don’t do it, much like how every other company in the world doesn’t take environmentalism seriously and just says “you first”.

The government needs to focus on making renewable energy investment a requirement for the biggest offenders. That is the only way we will force large scale change that actually matters.

[-] dislocate_expansion@reddthat.com 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well, if you use credit cards that data gets tracked, stored, mined for years to come, not to mention the dozens of internet servers it took for you to buy that bread in the immediate. If you use cash, I'd assume some local authorities use extra AI to track your movements via cloud cameras (plus fiat isn't fungible since it has serial numbers)

It would be nice to hear the "pro-[insert your local fiat]" energy use when people argue environmentalism against cryptocurrencies

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] O_i@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Does anyone know how much energy the banking system uses?

Edit: lol so much downvote for a reasonable question? Enjoy your inflation and your money being sent overseas by your masters squares

https://www.youtube.com/live/1jOUnFH-Ins?si=DNiscpajsDoUmbvd

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

A fraction of what it takes for thousands of machines to perform rework of the same problem.

This isn't the good argument you think it is.

[-] O_i@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Bitcoin miners aren’t doing re work, they mine the next block of thousands of transactions.

There’s also the other side of the conversation that over 51% of the network uses green energy.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 5 points 8 months ago

NFTs aren't bitcoin lmao. Nice try though.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Damn, if you'd actually watched the video you'd know he spends about 40 minutes covering the issues with crypto as it's crucial to understanding NFTs.

Nice try, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 8 points 8 months ago

Yes. Legacy banking systems use way more than at least Bitcoin.

"Bitcoin's emission intensity, a measure of emissions per unit of power, is now its lowest ever, dropping 18x faster than the banking sector over 4 years."

https://www.batcoinz.com/p/issue-001-the-narrative-is-shifting

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 8 months ago

Lol. Fucking batcoinz? That's the source? Also love that you have to pay to read this random guys musings about bitcoin. The way to make money in Bitcoin is still mostly selling others on Bitcoin.

What a slow burn of a pyramid scheme.

[-] O_i@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I encourage you to read more. If you’re using lemmy then you should already understand the core concept of bitcoin (not crypto/shitcoins)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 3 points 8 months ago

The link isn't the sources but merely a conduit for the cited information. Also, you don't have to pay to read it. Clearly you didn't see the "continue reading" link to get passed the popup.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 8 months ago

Dude it wasn't from a reasonable place if you immediately swing to screaming about masters like a delicate snowflake because people don't like your MLM.

The conversation is about bonfire of resources this speculative "free" asset uses and you weren't asking in earnest you just wanted a win that your blaze wasn't the the only one.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
385 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59379 readers
2273 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS