402
Oppressive theist group argues amongst itself about wha their imaginary friend in the sky wants.
They don’t care what it wants. They care how they can frame what they want to seem like what it wants. What they want is pretty clearly spelled out here: more babies.
Oppressive theist group argues amongst itself about wha their imaginary friend in the sky wants.
Maybe they could exclusively focus on that for a while and get back to us if they ever come to an agreement on whose religion is the only correct one?
Meanwhile the rest of us could get on with the business of progressing society without their constant interference.
load more comments
(2 replies)
As horrendous as this ruling is, I'm also pissed at the pro-forced birthers that are upset by this ruling. It's so intellectually dishonest to object to this ruling when it uses the same justifications they use to oppose abortion.
These people pick issues to be passionate on but never actually put in the effort to research. And not just whether their position makes any sense, but what the downstream effects of the position would mean.
The politicians who write these anti-abortion laws are even more lazy. This is literally their job and they should have seen this coming. They could have put in exceptions for IVF from the get-go but they didn't, because they are more interested in winning points than writing effective legislation.
They could have put in exceptions for IVF from the get-go but they didn't, because they are more interested in winning points than writing effective legislation.
You can't square that circle. If you codify your religious myth that "life begins at conception" into law in order to ban abortions, then you also have to outlaw IVF by the very nature of the procedure.
Or ensure all embryos are born. Either way that's dumb
But they do want to outlaw it. They just didn't want everyone to know until AFTER the election. That way no one could do anything to stop it.
Unfortunately any theology shouldn’t impact lawmaking.
That statement is rather ambiguous as it could be read to mean it's unfortunate that theology can't impact lawmaking, or that it's unfortunate that theology is impacting lawmaking. Theology shouldn't impact lawmaking and the fact that it is is the problem. Republicans have been steadily chipping away at separation of church and state for decades now and we're seeing the impact.
Any hint that a lawmaker is letting religious beliefs dictate their legislation should be an automatic disqualification from office. Politicians shouldn't even be allowed to mention their religion while campaigning. Instead it's becoming de rigueur for politicians to affirm their faith on a regular basis, and we regularly have politicians citing religious beliefs in debates about legislation.
The only part of your comment that I disagree with is "unfortunately".
Fair, my comment was related to the post stating what role theology should play in legislation.
As someone who has two living IVF babies, 8 frozen embryos remaining, and is also Christian, this line struck a particularly strong chord:
"Nobody understands more that an embryo is not a child, than the person yearning for that embryo to be a child."
Knowing multiple people who have gone through IVF procedures, and have had it fail time and time again, i felt that as well. They were heartbroken, time and time again.
One lf them has a child on the way, and the other has stopped trying, for those who wonder :)
Who could've foreseen that restricting reproductive rights could go both ways?
I honestly didn't. Assuming devout being synonymous with maga, this headline caught me off guard.
Can I just ask why more babies being born is seen as a moral good? I'm dumbfounded because I've honestly never in fifty years heard this talking point before.
It's really this simple. The bible says "Be fruitful and multiply"
When the line "be fruitful and multiply" was first written there were fewer humans on the planet than now live in Houston.
Ehhh, a bit more than Houston. By 2000 BCE there were 20,000,000 humans on the planet, though I believe the majority of those were in China. Genesis was written between 1500-1200 BCE.
A bunch of white people in the united states are worried about birth rates because immigrant birth rates are high whereas white birth rates are on the decline. They're worried about white people becoming a minority because even though if you asked them they would say no, they know that minorities are treated poorly here.
Yep. It's called "replacement theory" and it's a core belief among racist organizations like Nazis, the Aryan nation and the KKK. It's also talked about constantly on Fox News and other right wing media.
Oh for sure, but the problem is they’re preaching is subtly and if you were’t already on alert that it’s bullshit, it can end up normalizing for some people since it’s not usually framed as “white vs black/brown” but as “ Americans vs enemies”, which sounds a lot less racially charged to mega normies who pay more attention to football and soap operas than they do to politics.
load more comments
(1 replies)
core belief among racist organizations
A bit outdated examples, try these:
CPAC, RNC, John Birch Society, Heritage Foundation
They're the same picture.
This is also behind the trans panic and concurrent anti-LGBTQ legislation in conservative states.
Sure, they'll package it with scripture and moralizing, but in the end? It's all about fear.
I wish everyone would just fuck everyone once and for all so we're all the same god damned race.
You know damn well they’d find something else to divide us, you just tryna get laid is all 😏
load more comments
(1 replies)
You should run on the "everyone needs to fuck everyone " platform
load more comments
(4 replies)
Because a man in a book said something about going forth and multiplying
Skip to 0:30 for the relevant bit.
I've seen the interview. You can tell the guy is just completely lost in the conversation.
But my question is this: I understand the assertion that embryos are somehow human, whatever, and I have a sort of begrudging respect for anyone who commits to that and opposes abortion because it is murder. Fine. Like politically and morally I'm completely opposed to that and I will fight them every step of the way, but at least I can understand and respect their commitment. I think it's valid to oppose abortion on those grounds, I suppose.
But if the argument is that abortion is wrong because we need more babies to be born, that is a completely different argument. That one says abortion needs to be illegal not because it's killing babies, but because we have to force women to have babies against their will because babies are good.
And don't come at me with, "they've always just been about control and forced birth" because I know that but I also know there are individual people who are just really committed to the idea of embryos as human life. And the right was sort of constrained by the need to keep that particular wool pulled over those particular eyes.
Is this the moment the mask comes off? I'm just... gobsmacked, really. Killing Roe was the absolute worst thing the GOP could do and everyone knows it. They fucking know it. You would think they would try to settle on making some ground to move the arrow, but walk it back a little bit to cool some of the outrage. But no!
I'm just... this is insane.
What they could go after next:
- Same sex marriage
- Gay sex
- Porn
- Contraception
- Vasectomy
- Divorce
- Interracial marriage
What they ~~could~~ will go after next:
They already are. And have been for a very long time.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yesterday's Last Week Tonight showed Tommy Tubervile making that realization in real time. It was pretty incredible.
Would that be the same guy who had trouble grasping the concept of "you don't actually need to swear on a bible" live on air?
Possibly. He's extremely stupid.
Possibly. He's extremely stupid.
And yet he managed to convince enough voters that he's the best person for the job...
There must be a lot of gullible people in his state.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Maybe they should have learned the complete definition of abortion before banning it
This people are so stupid and they make our laws.
"I think the biggest concerns are that people elsewhere forget about us and they think, 'Oh they're just the conservative state, and they're all country bumpkins. Don't worry it will never happen here.'
"And the next thing you know, it is happening in other states that are ultra-conservative."
As a progressive in Texas...fuckin YEAH. Some of us are trying to bring reality back and it's really annoying to get lumped in with the crazies.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Gotta Love an argument about what god would want while people suffer.
Feel sorry for those caught up in this and I hope some have a light bulb moment.
Life is about navigating one's principles versus one's realities.
Xians do exceedingly badly at this in the meta-modern world.
Leopard's are feasting on faces rn.
It will balance itself out with all the unwanted babies once contraceptives and abortion are banned, and rape is decriminalized.
Spread and populate the universe, sky daddy said. This goes against that
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
402 points (100.0% liked)
News
23177 readers
2865 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS