295
Did anyone notice how one billionaire has the power and control to decide who can be elected and who can't?
That isn't a democracy - government by the people
That's known as a plutocracy - government by the wealthy
We need campaign finance reform (among a LOT else but this would help) preventing corporate money entirely. Which means getting rid of Citizens United first
Yes, the corruption stems almost entirely from the legalized bribes.
wolf-pac.com if you’d like to join the effort to stop this madness
a) very true.
b) best of fucking luck on that.
Never should have happened in the first place. Anthony Kennedy.
They like to hammer talking points to the masses to control the message. How does one spread this realization for the masses to hear it?
The masses are extraordinarily susceptible to corporate media. All you need to do is control that - or, let’s be real, a good chunk of it is all that’s needed - and you’re in!
And that’s why networks and studios sell for billions of dollars. Also, “television never changed anyone’s mind, and I’m not swayed by advertisements”
We're somewhere between a total plutocracy and an oligarchy. The millionaire class has a ton of sway
I disagree .... the millionaire class has ALL the sway
Naw the billionaires drink the millionaires milkshake
Yea we need to tax the fuck out of billionaires so they cease to exist.
That’s the only story here.
Okay so just outspend them, right?
I guess things don't go better with Koch.
🎵Have a Koch and a Fascist regime…🎵
She's done, it doesn't matter if she drops out Tuesday or a week from Tuesday. Republicans now are Trump voters and that's the end of it.
40% in SC preferred her over Trump, that does not bode well fir the cheetoh
They wanted gerrymandered districts, and now they have to deal with the consequences.
MAGoos are going to keep winning the primaries, because they are super motivated to vote in every election. Then they'll keep losing the popular vote because people will turn out on election day.
Gerrymandering doesn't impact statewide elections like President, Senator, Secretary of State. Just Congressional districts.
SC still votes Republican every time.
It certainly sounds like a recipe for voter apathy amongst SC Republicans.
South Carolina hasn't voted Democratic since 1976. They aren't going to change now.
Doesn't need to flip blue...
It's a winner take all state, so a Trump win is a Trump win. It doesn't matter by how much.
That's to bad, I was hoping she would continue to divide the red team as much as possible.
LOL
I heard her for the first time the other day and she was AWFUL. Wooden and patronising.
This is good, the last thing I want is competent people running the republican party
Considering how she handled the civil war slavery question I’d say describing her as competent is a stretch
Compared to the alternative‽
Haley holding the title of “least awful venereal disease from the GOP” doesn’t make her a competent politician
I'd rather have her running against Joe and orange man in jail
Approved.
Every American politician at the upper levels relies on such vast sums of money to campaign. Its just a question of finding out who owns them. Doesn’t matter which side
Yeah? Who owns Katie Porter.
Demand better from your politicians
Both sides!!!!
Marching orders coming down from the powers that be
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
295 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19104 readers
2258 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS