175

A loud minority of Texans call for Independence, which is not really possible as far as I know, BUT could the Rest of the USA just kick another state (Not necessary Texas) out? Or is this also not possible?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 134 points 8 months ago

The US Constitution currently has no mechanism to break any individual State out of the Union. Throughout our history, this has been interpreted as a sign that the Union is perpetual, and not able to be dissolved. This got put to the test in our Civil War, where a bunch of states up and said "We're Leaving" and the Federal Government said "You can't just do that". They fought a war over it, and the Federal Government won, proving its position correct by force.

With that said, the US was founded as a government of the People, and so if the people want to carve out a way for States to leave, they must first establish a mechanism via amending the Constitution, which requires a 2/3 vote in both houses of Congress (or a Constitutional Convention) coupled with 3/4 of State Legislatures ratifying it.

There is a provision, though, to make States out of other States. Maine and West Virginia were both formed out of land that belonged to Massachusetts and Virginia.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 26 points 8 months ago

Wonder though, does that mean states can combine?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Actually, yes, but that has never happened.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

It's laid out very explicitly in the COTUS (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1):

New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.

The funny thing is that during the civil war, West Virginia seceded from Virginia, and Congress voted to allow it and they were accepted into the union. There are a lot of people who argue that when that happened it was unconstitutional. However, it has never been tested, as far as I know.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 69 points 8 months ago

CalExit was a russian disinfo plot to weaken the US, and Texit knows that, but they love russian disinfo.

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As a Texan who is working to create change in this state, please don’t kick us out. We aren’t only the bad things you see on the news. We can offer you:

Brisket
Big Tex
Cowboy Hats
Willie Nelson
Chuck Norris
Fried (insert any food group)
Everything cool about Austin
Czech kolaches
Boots galore
And so much more.

Help us. We are a lot more purple than the news makes it seem, and we have been gerrymandered to the point that we need more than a simple majority to create change. If you can find it in your hearts to assist us in becoming a swing state, the whole nation stands to inherit all the things that made Texas an iconic part of the country in the first place. We are worth the effort.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Chuck Norris

No thanks, we got enough Christofascists.

We also got enough fried food and brisket.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Spent a lot of my formative years in Tx... dude...

Texmex. If we lose texas, we lose the fusion of meat and cheese and guac and tortillas that is texmex. It's worth saving all on it's own.

Otherwise to your list I'd add: Stevie Ray Vaughan, Austin City Limits, H-Town / dj screw pantera's Pantego and so much more.

and fuck chuck norris, he's a fundie chode.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SeabassDan@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I feel like a lot of people in Joe Rogan's circle have been moving to Austin, and with his current influx of cash it seems centered around that, which means he's most likely been looking for what benefits the ultra rich, and will vote and promote accordingly.

Like when Chappelle jokingly said we should give Trump a chance because he was trying to get those tax cuts on the horizon. For the rich. Which didn't really sound like a joke. Which was followed by bringing Musk onstage and laughing at the poor. Left and Right aside, it's about the money for these guys, and I'm a little bit wary about a place so willing to accommodate.

I could be wrong, but the wealthy tend to know exactly where to know and why, but it could also be envy on my part.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Every Texan I've ever met has been a good person. The only time I ever see the Texas represented in the media is in the media.

[-] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 months ago

I've seen Texans in the wild go on tirades when the attendant at the store checkout says "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas"...

The vast majority are definitely good people, but just want to point out that the people you see in the media are real. They are here, and they are loud.

It's also easy to forget that living in the cities doesn't represent the people everywhere in the state either. As long as I'm in a city, anywhere in the US, I've never seen extremely blatant racism. But go to the wrong areas in small towns and you get jeered at for not being white.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As someone from MA, I think Shiner Bock should be on that list.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] False@lemmy.world 51 points 8 months ago

Anything is possible with a constitutional amendment.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 35 points 8 months ago

To further add, there is nothing in the Constitution which allows for having a state leave and the Constitution is where that process would be to be laid out. So, if a state wanted to leave and the rest of the country agreed, you would need a constitutional amendment to spell out that process.

Given the high bar required to amend the Constitution, having a state leave would need to be very popular politically.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago
  1. Dems suggest texas can texit if the GOP drafts it.

  2. GoP doesn't want to blink, crafts it in a way that gives Texas power when it leaves, to please the howling magats

  3. Dems say "cool. These 31 states on both coasts are seceding. Using the process laid out, each coastal block will reorganize into its own group.

Now the red states are booted. Miller time.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Igloojoe@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

That would require Congress to be functional.

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Or if most of the population just decides to ignore the constitution. But how likely is that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bitcrafter@programming.dev 5 points 8 months ago

Except for denying a state equal representation on the Senate without its consent; the Constitution explicitlyforbids that.

[-] kirklennon@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

And yet that provision is itself still part of the constitution so really an amendment just needs to have an initial sentence to override that limitation first. If there’s actually support for a change, anything can be changed.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Any amendment to the Constitution to show secession or for a state to be removed would obviously change that, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago

If it gets to that point, I think its more likely to declare the state in insurrection or rebellion and send in the army to passify it, rather than trying to expunge it.

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

yes, sorry, I am what you would call catastrophically sleep deprived so its a miracle i'm as legible as I am.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

There's some pretty valuable infrastructure in TX and many other states. They'd definitely take it back and give the idiots who are responsible for the trouble a token fine and gentle slap on the wrist. It's an American tradition. They'll probably execute the derps doing the actual funding though.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

Honestly Texas just needs to split into five states. Not everyone in the state holds the same beliefs as the people who live in north and east Texas. The Houston and Austin areas are far more progressive and liberal.

[-] june@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Can you imagine how gerrymandered those state borders would be?

[-] lordnikon@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

can a state be named after interstate 35?

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yeah and then those states can break into states and factions and — oh we got Mad Max, nice.

Luckily I'm not Texan, or even American.

[-] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 8 months ago

Then also split California and Illinois and New York and Georgia and Florida

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 30 points 8 months ago

With enough approval, the US could do anything. It's either Constitutional or it would be Constitutional after an amendment is passed and approved.

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 19 points 8 months ago

If it is by the consent of the rest of the states, then yes. I'm not aware of any existing legal process, but a constitutional amendment could fix that.

Such a thing is unlikely to ever happen. Territory means people, infrastructure, and resources, so it's almost always better to hold onto it, unless you can't defend it.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Yeah. If Congress did it and the federal government just enforced it there's not much anyone could do about it.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

They won't, though. They would lose revenue.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Except with red states. Most are running in the negatives.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I suppose it's possible but it would never happen unless that state basically committed an outright act of war against the rest of the US. At that point they probably would have left the US on their own though.

And even in that scenario the US government would probably send in the military to forcibly take that state back before they just give up and force them to leave.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not possible legally or Constitutionally; it's possible in that they can secede by amending the Constitution, or by winning a war of secession, but that's it. They can't leave and they can't be kicked out.

Though they could be divided into or amongst other, smaller States.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ugh@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

No, they cannot. I hope someone gives you a more in depth answer because I'm very sleepy. Socially, just because a state votes red doesn't mean that everyone there is awful. It would not be fair to those citizens.

I do believe that texas has the right to secede. It won't happen, but it was part of the bargin to rejoin after the Civil War.

[-] felbane@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

Belief has nothing to do with anything. The resolution that granted Texas membership into the Union allowed for Texas to divide itself into five separate States, but not to leave the Union.

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Quote the exact text of law or Constitution that informs your belief a state can secede, bud, or you should change that belief. Not understanding that states can't secede is dangerous. Being told to stop slavery was why all the southern states tried to secede before the Civil War, but the war actually happened because they tried to secede and they're not allowed to.

Don't forget: united, we stand. It's as true today as it ever was.

[-] BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

They didn't secede because they were told to stop slavery. They seceded because it looked that the national consensus was moving against the expansion of slavery to new states and territories, which would have limited slave states overall power in the long run.

They were very explicit that they were leaving to protect slavery as an institution, but to be fair nobody in power was threatening to abolish it when they did so.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] neptune@dmv.social 6 points 8 months ago

If states fail to provide a representative government to their citizens, then the states has walked back some of the steps required to become a state. A serious SCOTUS could potentially block Senators and Representatives from a state that really gerrymanders or denies people the right to vote. In my opinion.

There is currently a challenge to remove 10% of WI representation because they removed ten percent of voters from the rolls.

[-] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The district of columbia is not a state so it's probably an easier place to start.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
175 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35706 readers
2078 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS