126
Tucker is a coward, a propagandist and a squidgy little estrogen stuffed dumpling.
I love the part where he goes shopping and compares the price of his basket to the price in the US, and it comes out to about 50% cheaper. What he doesn't mention is that Russians bring in 10x less money a month than Americans do, which makes the cart much more expensive.
Tucker knows this, he's hoping the maga hats don't
I love that Tucker is astounded by the "push in a coin to unlock it" technology. That segment might have been one of the first dozen times he actually personally set foot in a supermarket.
“with this handy rent-a-cart system, the dirty homeless wont be able to get their grubby hands on them!”
That's just not a thing in the US
I know he'd be offended, but lets not make estrogen a bad guy, eh?
It’s not a bad thing just like you say, if he takes offense to it then that’s his problem :)
Maybe he shouldn’t feel so insecure about his own sexuality then if he wants to attack others for it
Nobody expected him to ask tough questions. I don't even think anyone expectet him to ask mediocre interesting ones. He was just a propaganda tool. And a cheap one, too.
Even Putin thought he was a weak interviewer. He said he was bored.
If you weren't convinced by the interview, his overemotional gushing over the subway and grocery store tells you all you need to know about who's knob he sucks.
It shows that Tucker is a bitch for attention.
The man is fucking loaded, he doesn't need to do this job for the money - he does it because he's a bitch.
Carlson is basically an actor and a troll, nothing more.
1 dead opponent who also happened to be a xenophobic, right wing, white nationalist. Did we forget the ICC has a warrant for GW Bush?
Russia is in large parts culturally xenophobic/nationalist/right-wing, it makes sense they'd want to elect him. Why tf would they elect a leftist leader that has values they don't hold?
You can say whatever about Navalny, it doesn't change that ppl have the right to choose. Locking him up then killing him shouldn't be allowed and is a clear indicator that he was a huge threat to Putin. Your comment adds nothing unless of course you are implying it's ok for Putin to kill him because he was flawed too.
Also Putin has murdered many opponents
The people did choose, he polled the lowest of the presidential candidates in the last election. He wasn't jailed because he ran against Putin, he was jailed for his extreme right wing rhetoric and actions. The US made him a martyr and liberals have fallen for supporting what they would oppose here in the US.
Ah yes, the incredibly reliable Russian polling data for the totally fair and democratic Russian elections! Surely Putin's government didn't have any reason to directly manipulate or otherwise skew the data to make their least favorite opponent look bad. And certainly all of Navalny's supporters felt safe and sound voting for him, without any fear of repercussions from their permanent ruling party.
You appear to live in a world of hyperbole, making assumptions about things you know nothing about. You are neck deep in red scare propaganda
Okay 👍
I saw some clips of the interview and felt like I was watching the movie "The Interview"
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The former Fox News personality has drawn criticism for his recent interview with Vladimir Putin, which took place just days before opposition leader Alexei Navalny was found dead in a Russian penal colony.
But over two hours, Tucker Carlson did not ask Putin about how so many of his opponents wind up imprisoned and murdered, or the warrant the International Criminal Court has out for his arrest for war crimes in Ukraine.
But the clear implication of the video, scored with dreamy music and swelling strings, is that even though Vladimir Putin's regime imprisons and kills political opponents, and invades neighboring countries without provocation, it's all worthwhile because Moscow has an immaculate metro station.
Many commentators compared Tucker Carlson's enthusiasm for Moscow's metro to the boast of Italians fascists of the 1930's that Benito Mussolini "made the trains run on time" (a claim historians dispute).
Field Marshall Grigory Potemkin was said to have built facades of phony, idyllic-looking villages along the route that Empress Catherine II took to Crimea in 1787, to improve her view.
They were in town to interview Vladimir Putin, but he didn't ask any Muscovites to say what they thought of their president, or the elections in March, the invasion of Ukraine, Alexei Navalny, or other imprisoned dissidents.
The original article contains 646 words, the summary contains 212 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
You know who really does "make the trains run on time" and had several prime ministers resign in succession? Japan. You don't need a dictator for that. Wtf is even the point of that line.
Also, Mussolini didn't make the trains run on time. He forbade the press from reporting the trains running late
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
126 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19104 readers
2203 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS