315
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 183 points 2 years ago

I hate Tik Tok and also hate copyright disputes but can't help but smile when these big corporations have arguments over money and people start taking sides, like Tik Tok or Universal cares about any of their customers.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Why would having a personal interest or maybe a legal opinion rely at all on whether the companies care for you?

[-] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Who said you can't have an opinion? You can write a paper on the case for all I care just don't pretend corporations are our friends, or god forbid feel sorry for Tik Tok.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 121 points 2 years ago

I'll take, "Things That Won't Affect Me at All" for $400, Alex.

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 24 points 2 years ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 2 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

HUUUUUUuuuuuuuu-guh

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Arsinoe@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I knew what that was going to be before I clicked on it and I did it anyway. I only have myself to blame.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 80 points 2 years ago

Universal music owns the rights to Remember (walking in the sand) by the Shangri-las.

Oh no.

Oh no.

Oh no no no no no.

[-] alphacyberranger@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago

If somebody can scrap that annoying song from the internet it would be win for humanity

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 30 points 2 years ago

If only they also owned the rights to the annoying AI voice they use too.

[-] pythonoob@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

God I thought I was the only one who fucking can't stand that voice. Whenever I complain about it everyone else is just so nonchalant.

[-] mxcory 10 points 2 years ago

Those oh no's made me remember "Oh no you didn't" from Mercenaries 2. Had to listen to it.

Unrelated, but in wanted to complain about being reminded of the song. And now I want a Mercs 3...

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago

this is everything awful about the modern internet. i hate that they can just go and retroactively destroy creations like this. imagine if someone lost the rights to a song and they forced you to send the cassette back

[-] tabular@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

I don't use TikTok, do creators buy music fron TikTok to put in videos?

[-] Lightdm@feddit.de 21 points 2 years ago

No, they just put it as background music in their videos, but didn't actually pay for it. I would guess it constitutes fair use?

[-] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 56 points 2 years ago

Luckily, copyright law is based on guesses!

[-] ARNiM@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Fair use is context based. There is no simple yes or no answer.

[-] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

In this case there is. Background music is not fair use.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

And in many cases it's not. But not in all cases. For example, this sketch is a parody of this scene from the O. C.. It uses copyrighted music as background. Parody is fair use.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago

No, the music overlay music offered in the app is licensed and can be added. Creators who are performing covers, I believe, generally have the license held by TikTok or have their videos muted/taken offline. Special arrangements are made for intentional or encouraged content . That is a guess, but things like Megan Trainor’s “Gucci” where she is both the original artist and a participant would be a case like this. I would think Grace Kelly and sing alongs on arrangement-bound copyright material like Pentatonix doing public domain carols (or even Roger’s and Hammerstein) are negotiated licensing if outside of their pre-negotiated license.

[-] fishos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Imagine comparing free social media to a physical copy of media that you purchased.

Are you high?

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

It's a fair analogy about the erosion of ownership

[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago

Maybe folks are gonna start learning that just because they made content for a service, doesn't mean that they control it.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 39 points 2 years ago

Does it mean that all of existing tiktoks with universal's music will now be silent or is it only going to affect new videos?

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 65 points 2 years ago

God it would be great for a huge back catalog of tiktok videos to just be lame tweens dancing in silence.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

It impacts all videos. People are going to get a shock tomorrow when they realize they don't own any of those videos they took when they can no longer download them back with sound.

[-] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 31 points 2 years ago
[-] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Good, Tiktok has tiktokified enough brains by now.

Let the brains restore and get used to longer form content.

[-] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah!

swipes through Lemmy shitposts for the next three hours as my last two brain cells cry out in pain

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't all those cringe lip syncs count as fair use under parody?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You could make that argument, but the users would need to get the unedited songs from a legitimate source first. Tiktok wouldn't be able to provide them directly without infringing copyright.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I don't understand. Isn't TikTok a video making platform? What catalogue...?

[-] CluckN@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

TikTok was originally an app called Musically where people would lip-sync over songs. Music was/is the core of the app so copyrighting songs would cut down the majority of their content.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

There are estimates of this impacting between a few hundred million to a billion videos...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

UM is almost the sole reason why copyright claims on youtube are such a hellscape, so I'll gladly enjoy seeing them fight TikTok on this.

[-] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Controversial take but...

Yes, tiktok has several serious glaring issues as a platform but being such an absolutely huge platform, it has been (for a while now) much more than teen dance app. It's a platform that under represented and minority groups have found an audience to share their voice. The are legit journalists, artists, celebrities, organizations, dank memers, etc using the platform for good.

Obv it would be great if it wasn't all on tiktok (isn't there a federated equivalent?) but seeing people rejoice wherever something bad happens to the platform just lacks... nuance I guess. I know it's hard to compare social media platforms, but from what I can tell it's one of the less controlling, censor heavy platforms. And it's not owned by Elon Musk lol

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

definitely. it's a uniquely bad and insidious platform, but at the same time there's still good and important content on there you'd never see anywhere else. people are too quick to dismiss it because they haven't tried to tailor the algorithm to what they want properly and assume it's all shitty dance videos

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
315 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73331 readers
3737 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS