21

Social media users highlight character design similarities and developer’s generative AI…

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chocosoldier 44 points 1 year ago

what an awful article. some people on twitter speculated about some things. journalism!

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I want to like Palworld, but I don’t know if I can support running existing Pokemon through a fusor and passing them off as ‘new’ IP

Imagine being morally outraged on behalf of a multibillion dollar corporate behemoth.

[-] hal_5700X@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago
[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 16 points 1 year ago

It's a pretty fun game, but you sit there wondering how Nintendo has let this pass with some of the pals.

[-] Beanedwizard@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

It’s Nintendo. They’re probably preparing an elite team of their best lawyers in an Avengers-esque montage right now.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

NINTENDO LEGAL TEAM.......ASSEMBLE!!!!!

[-] HorreC@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

well if the digimon case taught them anything, they dont own the idea of monsters that you can catch, and if they are based on real world animals you cant really own them, outside of name.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I purchased Palworld today, started it up, I made a character, and walked around a bit, but I had to exit the game to go get an errand done. I get this game is aping pokemon hard, but the thing that struck me hard was how much they ripped off the "New Area Discovered" sequence Legend of Zelda Tears of the Kingdom used. Palworld did the same behavior as I left a cave, almost the same sound/music clip, the font looked the same, the color too. Yeah, very much felt like a copy/paste, what a bizarre thing to copy.

[-] swope@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Setting aside the topic of generative AI, isn't it about time that Pokemon goes to the public domain?

It's been a long time since I read Lawrence Lessig, but I think we would undo Disney's mods to copyright laws and allow more cultural remixing after a reasonable time. Like maybe 20 years instead of a century?

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Legally? No, it's not time for it to enter public domain.

That being said, yes, Pokemon should be close. The original copyright term in the US was 17 years with an additional 17 years extension. 34 years is plenty time to get money out of a work. It's time we stop letting corporations exploit the public domain without giving back

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Games

33880 readers
584 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS