61
submitted 1 year ago by Joe_0237@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Does the reddit style format inherently make for a toxic environment? Or is it a culture of toxicity from the influx of reditors? For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. On mastodon, people can't downvote you. These platforms are a joy to use, lemmy is depressing if you post. Its depressing because every post or comment, no mater the quality comes with downvotes, and usually no criticism to accompany it, you are left not knowing if youve made a mistake, or if its just trolls, bots, or idiots. At the end you feel insulted not improved. What do you think?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 year ago

Just post what you want to post and ignore the votes. A few downvotes is to be expected. Try not to read into them so much.

[-] Ggtfmhy@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Alternative way to think about it: 10% of people are insufferable assholes. Do you want them to be happy with what you say?

[-] Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a great way to think about it.

[-] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Mastodon was very depressing for me, this follower centric self presentation stuff is super not my style, it don't want it to be about me, I most likely suck but I say smart things some times, so I want it to be about the stuff I say.

Plus I don't mind being downvoted into oblivion. I actually think that this can be a good thing. It means that there was something at least controversial about what I posted so I might be wrong or have to argue better.

Lastly, mastodon is too much safe space and filter bubble. I want to read things from people that I disagree with and I want to argue with them in good faith. When I tried this on mastodon, I got misquoted, blocked, harassed... You name it.

[-] Joe_0237@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your insight!

[-] alianne@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This sparks a few different thoughts for me:

  1. I believe there are a few Lemmy instances that don't have downvotes enabled. (Beehaw might be one of them, but don't quote me on that.) If downvotes are a stress point for you, you could try joining one of those instances.
  2. I personally find both upvotes and downvotes to be useful as a way for me to quickly see the community's reaction to a piece of content. If I'm scrolling through my feed and see a post with many downvotes and few upvotes, for example, I know that post is unlikely to interest me and will move on. Conversely, a highly upvoted post or one with a mix of both upvotes and downvotes is more likely to have a good conversation in the comments in my experience.
  3. If I make a post that receives a large number of downvotes - or if most of my posts tend to be downvoted - that's a signal to me that I'm either not communicating my message well (confusing, passive aggressive, etc.) or that my message itself may not be welcome (hate speech, misinformation, etc.). In either case, I use that as a mental trigger for me to reflect on my posts rather than a reason to become unhappy with the community/platform as a whole.
[-] MiloSquirrel@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I would also add that getting a post mass downvoted can be a sign that a community might not be a good fit for you.

Like, using reddit as an example, if you see someone spreading anti-lgbt hate and getting upvoted, but when you try to be like "Hey that's not cool" or explain why they're wrong you get massively downvoted, it can be a really good sign that maybe it's not a great place.

[-] alianne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I agree, and I would extend this thought to also include situations where it's simply the wrong audience for your post. The content itself may not have anything wrong with it, but if you post a casual joke or comment without much depth in a community that's built on deep conversations and well thought out replies, for example, you're likely to be downvoted simply because the context wasn't appropriate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alaxitoo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I barely posted on Reddit due to the thought of people hating what I said or posted 😊 I think here is more friendly since it’s not huge, I share what I like and if people don’t agree that’s cool! As long as it makes someone happy it’s worth it ✨

[-] Chrisosaur@startrek.website 16 points 1 year ago

People breed toxicity, especially if you disagree with them. The more people a site has, the shittier it is. People suck.

[-] Gorbachof@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Your opinion makes me angry 😡

[-] Chrisosaur@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago

Fuck you. Imma tear down your fucking walls, Gorbachof.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Screw you asshole. More people make a site better!

[-] Chrisosaur@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Go buy a vowel ya fuckin prick.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

I’m not trying to be negative here with you - but anyone complaining about downvoted will often get another downvote from me. Say what you want to say, stand by your convictions, and don’t worry about what the internet thinks about that.

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I upvote anyone who disagrees with me, as long as they're not a complete brute about it.

[-] saddlebag@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don’t see the poster explicitly complaining about getting downvoted. How I read it is that they think that downvoting encourages people to be negative and weaponise their downvote. And, given what you’ve said, they’re spot on and you inadvertently proved their point.

[-] Scooter411@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I saw the post more as someone who is too worried about what the group will think of their comment to allow for dissent.

That being said, what I meant about people who complain about downvotes was the old Reddit trope of “edit: really? Downvote me for asking a question?” On a comment less than an hour old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For lack of a beter example, on stackoverflow, when someone down votes you, it comes with a comment saying how to improve. ... These platforms are a joy to use

I don't know what part of the internet you are from, but where I am from, Stackoverflow is looked down on as the quintessential example of toxic behaviour.

I've found some of the most dismissive people in tiny stack exchange groups, and experienced similar unexplained downvotes.

What SO, Reddit, and Lemmy maybe all have in common I think, is people tend to agree or disagree based on their convictions, as opposed to agreeing or disagreeing as a means of interaction.

I guess this puts the conflict and disagreement front and center. But at least then I know where people stand.

Perhaps it's important to not take opinions too personally, and remember that incencere agreement has its own problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 15 points 1 year ago

Someone praising Stack Overflow, that's a new one. The most criticized thing about SO is the toxicity and elitism of the users. Downvoting almost always comes with no explanation there.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] borlax@lemmy.borlax.com 13 points 1 year ago

Yearning for affirmations via fake internet points is the toxic part, not the format of a website.

[-] Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Took the words right out of my mouth. Take my downvote.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 year ago

Downvotes are not a reflection on you, they are a representation of how much everyone else agrees or disagrees.

I don't personally want the downvotes hidden or removed like how it is on Youtube.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think the format had anything to do with it, considering it was much more like Lemmy is now when I first joined 11 years ago and I've seen the same decline in other social mediums that didn't share formats as Reddit. It's just what happens when you get enough people together in one place. The abundance of dumb fucks and bad actors simply take over.

[-] slimsalm@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

Imo, downvotes is just a disagreement. Being offended by it sounds like a "you" problem, we all have to deal with it.

Upvotes normally give me answers I need for at that moment. Downvotes makes me reassess myself.

I dont think you must read to much into the downvotes. Understand the situation why people might have downvoted you, understand why other people get upvoted, assess the situation. And most of all, understand that not everybody will always agree with you

[-] Joe_0237@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

What? people wont agree with me? LIES! (<-- that is a joke). I'm not offended, and i agree, i here, am a truth seeker looking for insight, thanks!

People on Lemmy try to rationalize that they'll use the downvote as intended (off topic content) but our ape brains eventually just make downvote = I don't like said thing.

I wish we could do away with upvotes and downvotes altogether.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

For me it always was about "Do I want to see posts/comments like this?" If yes, upvote, if not, downvote, if I don't care, then nothing. Off-topic is for reporting to mods, not downvoting IMO.

[-] Narrrz@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I think having some form of "I agree with this" or similar helps to make you feel engaged with the content (for better or worse).

I think perhaps the actual person responsible for the post or comment shouldn't be able to see the results, though, otherwise it just becomes another ego building thing, and you see people strategising explicitly to build karma like on reddit. instead, the author should see a rating, like "slight approval" "mixed feelings" "strong dissent", etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Steve@compuverse.uk 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm thinking you care too much about the thoughtless reactions of anonymous strangers.
Remember... In this game, the points don't matter.

[-] Joe_0237@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

its strange because its not the disapproval that gets me, its not knowing why. I guess the lesson is that if someone did not even say why, its not really something anyone actually cared about.

[-] Mutelogic@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

This is exactly it. They don't care about your post or you or anyone really. For them, it just feels good to bring down others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I would always cringe so hard whenever I saw someone on reddit talking about downvotes, lack of upvotes, or karma at all. It's silly. Quit worrying about it.

Don't change the way you express yourself just to make yourself more acceptable to the internet hivemind. The internet is a toxic place. Lots of people simply find joy in anonymously hurting others. Just comment and move on. And maybe reply to comments that are made in good faith.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ghostwolf@lemmy.fakeplastictrees.ee 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

During my time on reddit, I've learnt to appreciate downvotes. Silent feedback is much better than passive-aggressive replies that serve no purpose other than letting the person vent out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SapphicFemme@lib.lgbt 4 points 1 year ago

Thankfully the instance I'm on doesn't have downvotes. I find what leads to toxic communities is when admins don't remove toxic content or users.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 year ago

It is a problem of an Eternal September. Reddit was set up where the downvote was supposed to mean more than just disagreeing with people, but the influx of users, especially those only participating with Reddit by upvoting and downvoting, couldn't be taught what you were supposed to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The only place on here that I've noticed downvotes is on comments that have been obviously social media shills (reddit or meta) or right wing type comments that are not the type of thing a community should support in my opinion. I'm not saying you're doing either of those things and if you're being downvoted in another context I don't know why.

That said, downvotes shouldn't really get you down. If you've said something awful then you deserve them and should reassess your outlook if you were unaware that your views or attitude were unpleasant. If you're getting downvoted on a tech related thing then I don't know what that's all about but I would try not to worry about it too much because it doesn't really affect your life, it's just a fake internet down arrow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's the format. Forums generally get toxic when they're too big. The negative influence of a toxic user is much greater than the positive influence of a non-toxic user. The bigger the user base the more toxic users. Eventually it gets to a critical mass where you're seeing enough toxic replies to make the whole platform seem toxic.

Reddit is 18 years old. Lots of time to attract toxic users. I wasn't on Reddit from the start, but people have said Reddit didn't suffer toxicity until after it was around 10 years old. Lemmy is four years old now so it will be a while. Though Lemmy may attract a smaller less toxic crowd and avoid toxicity indefinitely.

I don't have a high opinion of community at Stack Overflow as it started out elitist by nature of its policies and rules. Yeah that's going to breed toxicity right out of the gate. I have to admit Stack Overflow has been a really good resource for technical information at times, but its community is harsh. As much as I've used it to find good technical information, I've never made an account there or had any desire to post there.

[-] Barbacamanitu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's a good point about toxic users having a bigger influence than non-toxic users.

It's easy to see a comment that you mostly agree with and just not upvote it. But seeing a comment that's factually incorrect or toxic will both welcome downvotes.

[-] neko@fishfry.cheese.beer 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Instance admins can simply disable downvotes. You don't need them.

[-] Veraticus@lib.lgbt 3 points 1 year ago

NO! YOU SUCK!

More seriously: downvotes can be disabled on Lemmy instances on an instance-by-instance basis. I have them disabled on mine, for example, because I too find them difficult to deal with. If you don't like downvotes, that could be an easy solution for you.

[-] schwim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

As a former Redditor, I can only say that I've not yet begun looking at votes. Why do you determine the value of your post based on that? Make your post, read and respond to people who comment and have a great day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
61 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43831 readers
1182 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS