128
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The latest stopgap funding bill gave lawmakers an early-March deadline, but now their schedules call for a light workload in February

Once the House on Thursday finished kicking the can on government funding until early March, lawmakers did what almost comes naturally at this point.

They left town for a 10-day break, not returning until the night of Jan. 29.

Exempting half-days that are scheduled for traveling into or out of Washington, the House has only five full legislative days on its calendar before lawmakers leave Feb. 16 for what is slated to be an almost two-week break from the Capitol.

...

Instead, House Republicans have set themselves up with at least seven more weeks of haggling over these agency budgets. Now two weeks since agreeing to stick with the original $1.66 trillion outline, congressional leaders and top members of the Appropriations committees have yet to agree on slicing up that pie, which is the only way for Congress to then approve the 12 bills covering all the agencies.

Non-paywall link

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 31 points 10 months ago

these people dont want to achieve things, they want sound bites to get re-elected. the house is no longer functional. how do we fix that?

its not like they can control or fix this problem themselves.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

Get rid of the Republicans.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Building on this idea, since Reagan Republicans have convinced people that government is the problem. So at this point, Republican voters don't even expect their representatives to ensure a functional government. Notice that every time there is bipartisan agreement on a stopgap funding measure that a cadre of the Republicans is livid, because they don't want the government to function.

They have been screaming for years about the crisis at the border, now that there's a Senate bill to address it, they vehemently oppose it.

[-] SteveCC@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

RepresentUs has a thorough comprehensive plan - https://represent.us/

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 10 months ago
[-] Zorque@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Actually show up to elections more than once every four years.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Conservatives are doing this shit. The normal people are working hard to try to convince the conservatives to be human, but they refuse.

[-] tjhart85@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Uncle Jay Explains Congressional Recess!

With a schedule like that, no wonder they can't get anything done! But yeah, when 1/2 the govt literally wants to point and say "See! Government doesn't work!" I don't know how we can function without getting them out.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

I wonder how much this would change if we didn't know how our representatives voted. Thanks to Google sucking ass I can't find a source, but it wasn't until the 20th century when we knew how our individual Representative and Senator voted. That way lobbyists couldn't buy votes, and fringe extremists couldn't pressure specific politicians.

This is the same reason we vote anonymously: It prevents vote-buying and retribution. I wonder how different our Congress would act if we couldn't blame "those other guys" but only "those clowns in Congress." The political impetus would be quite different if AOC and Matt Gaetz were considered part of the same dysfunctional group.

Anyway, shit's fucked.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


That has left Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) to focus on confirming presidential nominees and nudging along negotiators on the security package to bolster defenses of Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan that also includes a legislative deal related to the U.S.-Mexico border.

“If we keep extending the pain, creating more suffering, we will pay the price at the ballot box,” Rep. Patrick T. McHenry (N.C.), a senior Republican who served as acting speaker during the October tumult, told reporters Thursday.

Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), chair of the Senate spending panel, suggested that one or two of the dozen allocations were hung up in a partisan squabble and that has delayed everything else, because lawmakers need to settle precisely on how much money each pot gets before they can finish writing the appropriations.

With the House out of session till the end of January, and the Senate leaving Feb. 8 for half of that month, there won’t be much time to make these decisions and then decide how to process all the spending bills.

There is broad agreement that lawmakers want to finish their work — just 13 senators, all conservative Republicans, voted Thursday to simply extend current funding levels until the end of the fiscal year, against 82 pushing for a final budget — but they just keep going in circles.

It’s normal for Congress to blow past the Sept. 30 statutory deadline for funding the government, but lawmakers usually finish up before Christmas after passing a couple of “CRs” to avoid a shutdown.


The original article contains 1,393 words, the summary contains 255 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
128 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS