128

Congress keeps punting on the hard work, then leaving town for recess (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The latest stopgap funding bill gave lawmakers an early-March deadline, but now their schedules call for a light workload in February

Once the House on Thursday finished kicking the can on government funding until early March, lawmakers did what almost comes naturally at this point.

They left town for a 10-day break, not returning until the night of Jan. 29.

Exempting half-days that are scheduled for traveling into or out of Washington, the House has only five full legislative days on its calendar before lawmakers leave Feb. 16 for what is slated to be an almost two-week break from the Capitol.

...

Instead, House Republicans have set themselves up with at least seven more weeks of haggling over these agency budgets. Now two weeks since agreeing to stick with the original $1.66 trillion outline, congressional leaders and top members of the Appropriations committees have yet to agree on slicing up that pie, which is the only way for Congress to then approve the 12 bills covering all the agencies.

Non-paywall link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

I wonder how much this would change if we didn't know how our representatives voted. Thanks to Google sucking ass I can't find a source, but it wasn't until the 20th century when we knew how our individual Representative and Senator voted. That way lobbyists couldn't buy votes, and fringe extremists couldn't pressure specific politicians.

This is the same reason we vote anonymously: It prevents vote-buying and retribution. I wonder how different our Congress would act if we couldn't blame "those other guys" but only "those clowns in Congress." The political impetus would be quite different if AOC and Matt Gaetz were considered part of the same dysfunctional group.

Anyway, shit's fucked.

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024

128 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers

2398 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News