459
submitted 2 years ago by sabbah@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OtakuAltair@lemm.ee 50 points 2 years ago

They've also been on Mastodon (@elonjet@mastodon.social) for about 8 months with 66k followers already

[-] theinspectorst@kbin.social 49 points 2 years ago

He's not tracking Elon's jet. The activity of Elon's jet is already public information. All he's doing is republishing it on a widely used platform.

[-] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Try explaining that to Elon, "the world's smartest man"

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The ridiculous thing about his claim of 'doxxing' and 'assassination coordinates' is yeah, it's all public on the FAA website, and anyone who was trying to stalk him or whatever would just look there. The tracking Twitter account was basically just niche celebrity news.

[-] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago
[-] starlinguk@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

Yes, not sure why the Guardian is reporting on this. I'm not even sure Threads is available in Britain.

[-] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

It's The Guardian, they were probably paid to advertise for Threads

[-] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah, it mostly seems like a publicity piece for Threads. I think Threads is available in the UK though, but not the EU.

[-] st3ph3n@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

I think it is kinda newsworthy because Elon already threw his toys out of the pram when Threads launched and started eating what was left of Twitter's lunch. That this one guy just reposting the already public data about his jet's movements bothers him so much is delightful.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Threads is having problems with EU regulation, not the UK.

[-] kaito@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah unfortunately being on Threads doesn't guarantee that the information would be public. I think this news is only relevant to the few who have joined Threads.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I was about to say, Mastodon seems like a much better choice.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Now why would Elon Musk, self-proclaimed Free Speech Absolutist, have that account suspended?

[-] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago

Good question. Maybe the same reason why Elon "humour is now legal again" Musk can't take a little teasing?

[-] jibbist@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

The data is public, the feed just only prints out publicly available flight data - if Elon wants privacy, he should just charter a private jet used by other billionare dickheads, it's not exactly a hardship now is it

[-] bioemerl@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago

This is why competition in the online space is essential and we need strong regulation to kill the network effects that keep Twitter and reddit afloat.

A platform should not be able to unilaterally censor anyone.

[-] lucidwielder@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What lol? They never owned the internet, more like the users loaned them their attention for years - till they really screw up which they’ve been doing as of late.

I have nothing against coming down on companies that try & do anti-competitive things & pulling an API via ridiculous pricing is one of those things I feel the FTC should have the power to intervene in but I know conservatives would scream government over reach. They already do with both smaller & bigger things.

Regardless kbin, mastodon & Fediverse are all strong responses to what’s been going on & sadly they all need to avoid inter connectivity w/ these behemoths to ensure they don’t try underhanded tactics to destroy it, ironically. Maybe when/if they get to be of similar sizes & the momentum is too great for them to destroy a competitor then connectivity btwn the 2 can be done but till then it’s not safe imho.

[-] protput@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

This is definitely the reason why Elon bought twitter.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The flap that Musk made about that led to one of the most ridiculously dumb phrases he has said yet: "assassination coordinates".

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

For platforms with an amount of users in many millions, we need regulations on who can be banned, and for what reasons you can't.

[-] AquilaChill@fedia.io 2 points 2 years ago

There is a difference between keeping tabs on someone & stalking/harassment.
I don't like the Elon jet tracker stuff, I'm more a fan of privacy.

[-] vind@lemmy.world 50 points 2 years ago

It's not stalking though, if he wanted privacy he could fly on a normal commercial plane like everyone else.

[-] OtakuAltair@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

This is literally publicly available information.

[-] hoodatninja@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don’t like it either, but I’d be lying if I said I didn’t enjoy the irony of people who make billions violating our privacy complaining about their privacy being violated with their own tools.

[-] 520@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

Not to mention a nice reminder that Elon's petty fiefdom has its limits.

[-] C_Leviathan@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago

It's about as much of an invasion of privacy as posting the weather. It's publicly available information.

[-] Athena5898@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

do you think billionaires/ruling care about YOUR privacy? cause they don't. These people enact rules and regulations on us like cattle and then live differently as the world burns. A jet tracker is by far the least we can do to keep tabs on these people who would kill us for pennies (and have) and as mentioned it's all public info anyway, like it matters though.

[-] starlinguk@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

You can track most flights on flightradar24. It's public information. When I see an interesting plane fly past I look it up on Flight Radar. It's usually on there unless it's a small crop dusting plane.

[-] ansik@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

💡 It's Shill , not Chill.

[-] Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Elon isn't a private citizen. He's a public figure.

Rules are different. Elon puts himself in the spotlight repeatedly. He doesn't live a private life. Many of his billionaire cohorts do.

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Even if you are a private citizen, it doesn't matter. Informations on everyone's private jets are public information, no matter how "public" of a citizen the owner of the jet is.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
459 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48917 readers
1649 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS