161
submitted 2 years ago by Linkerbaan@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Hamas has released a video announcing the death of two Israeli hostages and claimed that they were killed by Israeli airstrikes.

The video showed a female hostage named in Israeli media as Noa Argamani, 26, speaking under duress, revealing that two men she was held captive with had been killed in captivity. It was not clear when or where the video was filmed and there was no independent confirmation of Hamas’s claims.

The three hostages were shown in a 37-second Hamas video released on Sunday in which the group urged the Israeli government to halt its aerial and ground offensive and bring about their release. The undated clip ended with the caption: “Tomorrow [Monday] we will inform you of their fate.”

In a statement released with the new video, Hamas’s armed wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam brigades, said the two men, believed to be Yossi Sharabi, 53, and Itay Svirsky, 38, had been killed in “the Zionist army’s bombing”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

IDF is an army of amateurs with expensive gear. Just read that article of the BBC about the women who were watching the Gaza border. The IDF only gave young women that job and didn’t even arm them. Then when these young women reported suspicious Hamas activity along the border for months on end the warnings were ignored basically because they were young and female. Of course when Hamas broke trough they were the first to get killed.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This reminded me of what the released hostages from a month ago said:

Freed Israeli hostages held by Hamas were terrified IDF airstrikes would kill them

"We were in tunnels, terrified that it would not be Hamas, but Israel, that would kill us, and then they would say Hamas killed you,"

Another released israeli hostage:

"The reality is that I was in a hideout that was bombed, and we became wounded refugees. This doesn't even include the helicopter that fired at us on our way to Gaza,"

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

The IDF responded with the following message:

[-] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

Israel's conduct has been absolutely deplorable and indefensible from the moment they started indiscriminately bombing civilian homes. That doesn't make it ok to mock the deaths of innocent people, regardless of the circumstances.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

I'm not mocking any deaths I'm mocking the IDF and their preposterous "bomb the hostages to safety" method

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago

Also known as the Hannibal Directive.

[-] Blackmist@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Israel operate on a revenge based policy. It really is not about the hostages.

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 years ago

This, x1000. It didn't used to be the case, but something snapped after Oct. 7. Hostages used to be famously sacred to Israelis, but something big changed. The hostages and their families have been treated terribly by the government.

For those unaware, Israeli soldiers executed three unarmed hostages who escaped from their captors about three weeks ago because they mistook them for unarmed Palestinians. Yeah.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

They were shirtless, waving a white flag, and yelling in Hebrew. The IDF killed them anyways.

At this point, the IDF has rescued -3 hostages.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Amazed to see some people actually believe what Hamas says.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So far, on average, they have been closer to the truth than the IDF's figures have been.

That's how trust works, when it isn't ideological.

Someone says something and later on when the truth is independently verified, or subsequent things prove the original claim to be true, you are more inclined to believe that person or group.

If someone says something, and later on it is proven untrue, you are less likely to believe that person or group.

When both sides of a conflict do both, you take the aggregate.

Israel has had a literal media policy of lying with exaggerated claims, with the view that people won't view corrections, for decades.

Does Hamas lie? Yeah, but not as systematically.

And you're surprised that people believe Hamas death toll numbers?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I've seen a lot of instances when the reverse is true. People take sides for whatever reasons, then refuse to even review the the side they oppose. They immediately call it propaganda or question source. They don't apply logic because it doesn't line up up with their internal narrative. The world is not black and white and denial of that fact gets you no closer to a conclusion.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Dudes over here trying to be like 'there is no objective truth' while totally ignoring the non-throwaway bit about lying being systemized by Israel.

It's literal state media policy. They've been open about it.

When one side objectively, countably, lies more than the other, that side is believed less. It's that simple.

Also, when a country restricts access to food, potable water, and medicine to a population they consider undesirable and than says it isn't committing genocide, then you also don't believe them. Those two things are mutually incompatible.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

You think it might be possible that if you are held hostage you might say what you are told to say?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How many west bank civilians are held as hostages by the IDF? Is it in the tens of thousands? I think it is.

Those are hostages.

They are picked up without committing crimes, tried by a military tribunal, not a court system and held arbitrarily. Meanwhile, settlers are tried via courts of their settler peers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] roastedDeflator@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago

The Guardian - Can we trust casualty figures from the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry?

In the past, the US state department’s annual human rights report indirectly relied on the same ministry’s casualty figures in quoting UN statistics drawn from Palestinian data.

Omar Shakir, the Israel and Palestine director at Human Rights Watch, said he saw no evidence that the numbers were being manipulated.

“We have been monitoring human rights abuses in the Gaza Strip for three decades, including several rounds of hostilities. We’ve generally found the data that comes out of the ministry of health to be reliable,” he said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] stmcld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 years ago

Is this the one where israeli soldiers said Monday to Sunday were terrorists lol.

What i don't understand is how brazen they were. They just pointed to the calendar and said the days of the week were terrorist names without even censoring it and expected people to believe them. Like what level of hubris is this?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago

They continue to believe that people can't translate.

It's amazing the difference in the speeches Bibi gives in English vs Hebrew

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 years ago

Hamas is the government.

This whole 'Hamas is evil incarnate' thing is propaganda itself. Everyone hears Hamas and thinks militant.

Hamas is the government.

The pencil pusher ministry of health dude? Hamas.

The hospital administrator? Hamas

The non doctors without borders doctors? Hamas.

This is like calling every person that was a reservist in the IDF at the festival a combatant. It's as much of a lie.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 8 points 2 years ago

Just because they're the government doesn't mean everything they say is true. They're going to lie and push propaganda just like any other government or organisation would.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And yet, multiple different unbiased organizations have found the Hamas Ministry of Health numbers to be accurate.

At this point, accusing them of being wrong 'because Hamas' is obviously bad faith propaganda.

It also goes with what our lying eyes see. Unrestrained bombing in a location the size of Manhattan with 2.2 million inhabitants is going to kill a lot of people.

Trying to argue otherwise is trying to argue against what is obviously true.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago

You forgot quite a few roles!

Those guys touting a dead body on a car? Hamas.

Those guys starting a war they're too weak to finish? Hamas.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

When was the last election?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

Was less than half of the population alive than?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think your point is well made, and I want to expand on it a bit, because it's a tricky thing for people to make sense of.

Hamas' militant arm is highly independent. Their civil administration answers to and collaborates with the same leadership, but the civilian leadership has very little control over the fighters, which operate along the lines of a militia, but in concert with a civil administration. So when we say "Hamas", we could be talking about the administrative workers or the military, and they're pretty different groups.

This makes describing them difficult. It's somewhat inaccurate to characterize Hamas as merely a terrorist group, but also as a conventional government. They're more of an unofficial ruling party that dominates a collapsed state, I think.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't reflexively distrust things attributed to Hamas but if Israel says anything nowadays I assume it's a lie, and I don't really trust defenses of the IDF's behavior either. If there is no genocide in Gaza then they should send all the money back and there better be a thank-you card in the envelope.

Don't downvote me, give me my money back.

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago

It seems pretty reliable that the hostages are dead.

The best case scenario is that Hamas is lying about the cause, and the IDF didn't kill them. That still means that the military campaign is obviously coming at the cost of these people's lives.

Netanyahu can save the hostages or water war, but not both. That's what a hostages situation is. He chose war, and the hostages are going to die if an outside force doesn't intervene.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In a statement released with the new video, Hamas’s armed wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam brigades, said the two men, believed to be Yossi Sharabi, 53, and Itay Svirsky, 38, had been killed in “the Zionist army’s bombing”.

Gallant said on Monday that the intense military operation in southern Gaza was nearing its end, but that without keeping up pressure, Hamas would not agree to release any more hostages.

The Israeli cabinet is deeply divided between moderates pushing for a deal to release the hostages and rightwingers who believe the military effort to “crush” Hamas should take precedence.

New details emerged in recent days of an agreement to allow medicine – such as vital prescription drugs – to reach the hostages, along with an increase in humanitarian aid into Gaza.

A diplomat briefed on the talks in Doha said the overall focus of the negotiations remained a cessation of hostilities and more aid for Gaza in return for the release of hostages, initially female, elderly and sick people, they added.

Rights groups have expressed alarm at recent detentions of thousands of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and widespread reports of their mistreatment.


The original article contains 1,268 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
161 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48732 readers
1981 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS