310
submitted 10 months ago by ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Skunk@jlai.lu 82 points 10 months ago

If it’s Boeing, I’m not going.

Yes it was a Max 9, and yes wait for the aviation herald report for details.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

We usually start New Year's with good news and promises we won't keep... Not with total failures. This is not good for their reputation.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 24 points 10 months ago

Nothing they've been doing has been good for their reputation for about 5 or 6 years now. That's what happens when people who don't understand the industry start being managers rather than engineers.

[-] anubis119@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago
[-] frokie@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Most defects appear either early or late into a products lifecycle

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 41 points 10 months ago

Apparently some planes are designed so the side doesn't fall off at all. I just don't want people thinking planes aren't safe!

[-] mxcory 18 points 10 months ago
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 20 points 10 months ago

I was thinking more of the other ones.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not really a window. It’s a plug put in where an optional emergency exit door would be. (Or so I’ve read elsewhere)

[-] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Oh, well that’s completely fine then.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 10 months ago

New functional emergency exit. Actually working better than designed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 34 points 10 months ago

Is it bad that my first thought on reading the headline was 'it's gonna be a fucking MAX, isn't it?'

[-] PanArab@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I remember watching a documentary that went over how the corporate culture in Boeing changed post the McDonnell Douglas accusation. The last plane that was done right was the 777.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 7 points 10 months ago

'There was a kid in that row, his shirt was sucked off him and out of the plane. His mother was holding onto him to make sure he didn't go with it,' a man on the first flight said

New phobia unlocked

[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago

Well, the fact that it was still able to make the landing is remarkable. This isn't the Comet after all...

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Airplanes are crazy over engineered. Something like half the systems can fail and they’ll still be able to land the plane.

The safety regulations are written in blood, but they’ve continually prevented more disasters.

I’m sure the MAX 9 is going to have a lot of investigation done very soon.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 10 months ago

Boeing is trying hard to unravel all that

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Very different modes of failure. Metal fatigue ripping apart fault lines in structural metal is very different from an emergency exit door popping out.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
310 points (100.0% liked)

News

23266 readers
2701 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS