286
submitted 1 year ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 120 points 1 year ago

Fuck trucks. I remember the Ranger it was barely bigger than a minivan. These things are obscene. People who own them don't need them. Most people don't even need trucks. People like to cosplay that they live up a 25 degree incline of muddy, rocky road. But a subaru would be just fine and IS in most of the world.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago

I drive a B2300 (the Mazda rebrand of the Ranger) and it kicks ass. I get 7-8L per 100km, when commuting, I've filled it to the tits with dirt, flooring and lumber, and it doesn't take up 2 parking spaces. I would pay an obscene amount to get the same truck but as an EV today. Why the fuck is that not a thing?!?

[-] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Best we can do is a behemoth truck that doesn't fit in spots and costs a first born child.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

This is actually a good point, why are there no small EV trucks?

I bet they exist in China.

[-] rubicon@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I see lots of Rivians where I live. I'm not about to spend $130k on a small truck though.

[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Ford Maverick is the size of the old school rangers. I have a hybrid one and love it. Only problem is finding one not marked up sky high.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Ever heard of a Ford Maverick? It's not a "real" truck since it's unibody instead of body-on-frame, but otherwise it's the next best thing to the old Ranger.

[-] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Transverse engine + transaxle + biased toward FWD

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

The b23 was a great truck, though.

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I recently bought a 2010 B4000 and it is a great size for a truck.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I remember the Ranger it was barely bigger than a minivan.

I own a Ranger and used to own a Ford Aerostar. I'm pretty sure they were literally built on the same platform. Also, my Ranger is a regular cab short bed, while my Aerostar was the long wheelbase version, so the van was definitely bigger.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

My dad used to have an Aerostar, loved that goofy looking little minivan. Ended up getting a Plymouth Voyager that looked very similar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lodra@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I probably don’t represent most people very well. But my wife and I have a single vehicle, a gmc sierra 1500. We probably use the bed twice a week. Trash/recycling. Moving heavy things around our property. Makes for a great mobile workbench for projects outside. And most often of all, we buy hay and grain for horses. A smaller truck would be a problem for us. We would actually benefit from a larger truck! But I don’t want a bigger gas guzzler. We get great fuel efficiency given the size of the truck.

Edit: I also don’t live in a city. It’s quite rural here

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

That, seems like a proper use.

I see many trucks with huge mud tires that they use as a main vehicle to commute to and from work and to run errands. I think these are the target for most people.

Obviously not (yet?) available in the US but other countries have much smaller trucks with larger beds. https://www.kia.com/dm/showroom/K2700-2022/specification.html

That plus a 2200 lb hauling capacity make them a very capable, efficient, and reasonably safe truck.

[-] Lodra@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Kinda funny how much the styles differ between USA and Europe 🙂. Looks like a great work truck. No space for a car seat in the back though so you would need a separate family vehicle. Which might be practical anyway!

This would satisfy my regular truck needs. But a 2200lb hauling capacity doesn’t work well with horses. A single horse can easily weighs 1200 pounds.

I could see this being great for many people here. But it’s also not a universal fit.

[-] Strawberry 3 points 1 year ago

I saw a similar truck in the US the other day, a Honda Street/Acty. It was so cute!

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 year ago

Do you run a farm? Meaning is your truck use for your business or job?

[-] Lodra@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I consider it a hobby farm. We currently have 2 horses and 3 goats. But it’s not a business at all and doesn’t generate income.

[-] vinceman 11 points 1 year ago

I do appreciate Ford has the Maverick now as well.

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

I used to have a ~'99 ranger. Loved that thing. Now the closest thing Ford has is the maverick which is not only bigger overall but it has a smaller bed so it's less useful.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

'10 B2300 driver. Why will no one make a real compact pickup instead of a movie theater with a 4 foot box?!?

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I would love an old Ranger with the extended cab and suicide doors....I hate the new ones are f150 sized. Also the Tacoma structurally is no larger than the original tiny version...it's all puffy body panels. Why can't we ha have small trucks?

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty arrogant to claim people that own them don't need them. I know welders that do on site welding and have heavy welding equipment mounted in the back.

You also wouldn't want to have a civic flying down a steep hill behind you towing a 6,000lb travel trailer.

Edit:

Today I learned a bunch of people like to drive slow behind a rolling death trap that is a civic with a 6K lb trailer. Cool.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago

I think we're not talking company trucks (which should park in a depot anyway).

It's about personal garage-queen road-manatees. Because of course it is.

Just abolish and amnesty the Dodge ram. Given the inordinate DUI numbers, roads would just be safer.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes this is different. But still, how do you go RVing. You can't, legally, without something that has the braking and towing capacities.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Glamping.

Or maybe just give up the "I want to travel and I want to take a single-wide with me" dementation.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not everyone needs to like or dislike the things you like and dislike.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I towed an a-frame tent trailer around the South Western US and Western Canada for like 2 months straight with a 2.5L Subaru Outback. People used to go camping with just a fucking station wagon. Could it tow a giant 25 footer trailer? No, would I want one? No, what's the point of literally towing a full sized house to "Get away".

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

9 out of 10 non-company pickups on the road are hauling huge dicks with tiny penises.

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

My first car was a '92 Ranger and it was a great little thing to have at that point in my life. It's really nice to be able to move without needing to worry about how to transport all your stuff to the new place and it was small enough that it still felt like a regular sized car.

The new rangers are pretty ridiculous in comparison.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] vinceman 45 points 1 year ago

Interesting it's just trucks that are the problem, and not SUVs as well. Just as large, hell some weigh more.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

The spa-burban is a truck.

Is it a 6000lb monster on a truck frame and enjoying the worse/looser safety regs? Then Truck.

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Most are on a literal "truck" frame. Silverado/suburban for example.

[-] vinceman 4 points 1 year ago

That ignores big unibody SUVs. Most that I'm speaking to are not on truck frames. For example https://www.autoweek.com/news/a1720016/ranked-every-unibody-non-luxury-three-row-crossover/

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

They are part of the problem too.

They're also literally a truck with a roof over the bed.

[-] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

In the US, SUVs are considered "Light trucks" and the same regulations apply to them.

[-] willybe@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

What is the point of a truck you cannot fit a 2x4 in the back?

[-] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 23 points 1 year ago

Satiates societally ingrained Petro-Masculinity for patriarchal men who are insecure about their status as a man in the modern age.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Could have easily said "little dick syndrome"

Nahh that's misandrist and body shaming. This definition is better.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

With how PC younger generations are I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not lol

[-] thedevisinthedetails@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am not a younger generation and am not being sarcastic. Body shaming men is just generally accepted but it's not okay to do that to anyone. There are plenty of other equally rude and more accurate ways to say someone is an insecure asshole. We should use them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] willybe@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Petro-masculinity is a brilliant term.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
286 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9454 readers
1297 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS