1296
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 50 points 9 months ago

He speaks to their "truths." He feeds their hopes. He bolsters their fear of a diminishing relevance. He says things they want to hear in a way that they understand.

He's the only one who holds a branch out to them and they clutch on to it like the trumpanzees they are.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Except it's not a branch. It's a clutching hand seeking their wallet, but they're too fucking stupid to see it.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

A fool and their money are soon parted.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 33 points 9 months ago

It seems that the importance of...ahem, "telling it like it is" cannot be overstated. i.e., racism is an extremely powerful effect.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

"telling it like it is" is just coded language to say "he says the shitty things that I think are true, so it makes me feel less shitty and empty inside"

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 27 points 9 months ago

"He's making it so that I can say the shitty things I have always just thought."

[-] porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net 9 points 9 months ago

it is pretty powerful having your beliefs be broadcasted and repeated ad nauseum by a figure you consider of authority. like discovering the idea you thought you had originally being already out there said by someone you hold in respect. for trump followers him just being the nominee of their party of blind choice is already worthy of praise and admiration.

trump just loves their endless money pit, and will say just about anything to get it. they love that they have a former president with attention from the media to propagate their delusions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 9 months ago

When you have nothing left but fear and hate…

[-] 6buck6satan6@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nothing left but fear, hate... and also, if polls hold, the senate, the house, the presidency, and they already have scotus, state-level politics, and huge tranches of circuit courts.

Yes, they're going to be crying so hard after they read all these dank, critical memes. That'll show 'em!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] arin@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

The racists want an idol to say it's okay to be racist

[-] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The problem with democracy is that most people are ignorant ...

edit: changed retarded to ignorant, I apologize to anyone who felt offended by my use of the term.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

It drives me nuts that people just casually toss out that slur.

English has so many other words you can use without insulting a whole group of innocent people and using this slur is just lazy.

[-] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

Apologies, I am not a native speaker, what adjective would you propose instead?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Ignorant or stupid is what I'm assuming you're going for but it's your comment so I'm not sure.

[-] Risk@feddit.uk 20 points 9 months ago

Aren't 'stupid' and 'idiot' just even older versions of 'retarded' and all describe people with developmental and/or learning disabilities?

[-] ADTJ@feddit.uk 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yep, also "dumb", " lame " etc. These are words for disabilities which then entered common parlance as slurs.

"retarded" is actually the other way round in that it just means "slowed" - but has historically been used as an insult directed towards people with mental disabilities.

Personally I think that what's offensive is scolding people for using the word in the correct context which prevents society from losing the association with the disabled and instead continues perpetuating that meaning even though that's the opposite of what they claim to be trying to do

[-] ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

"Retarded" definitely didn't start out as an insult. There was a time when "mentally retarded" was what people with developmental disabilities were called by the medical establishment. My Boomer mother still uses it without malice (and is scolded by my Gen Z kids) to refer to those with cognitive disabilities because it wasn't an insult when she was a kid. It was fully an insult when my Gen X self was growing up.

I think there may be too much white knighting for a word that no one seriously uses any more. "You can't use that word because in the past it was a designation for the cognitively disabled." But really "retarded" has lost any meaning other than as an insult to mean supremely stupid. It often doesn't even refer to a person but could be an object or a situation.

[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

You've pointed out the whole problem. Only two generations ago the word "retarded" was used without malice to refer to individuals who had a developmental disability. To use it as an insult, now, makes it all the more demeaning to those individuals with developmental disabilities.

It's different from "dumb" or "lame," which I've never heard used as an innocent way to describe a speech or physically impaired person, firsthand. Those words fit your description, better, of those that have been so far removed from their original meaning that they are no longer offensive by today's standards.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Edit (after I thought about it some more): I think ignorant would be best to use here, because stupid is also a slur that offends people for an inherent property, no real difference to retarded. I will edit my initial comment accordingly. Thank you for the heads up.

I just noticed your username and it made me feel so extremely disgusted that I am going to block you, just to never have to read it again, nothing personal though. Also, with such a username you are not in a particularly good position to criticize others for their choice of words imo.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

You: Insult a group of people that had no power over their condition

Them: Insults no one, has a ridiculous username

Your reaction: You're disgusting! I'll block you!

[-] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Calling a username disgusting is not the same as calling a person disgusting. I even wrote "nothing personal".

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

That's not what they mean, they mean that the person had a valid point and just had a clearly silly and exaggerated name but you decide to engage with that rather than their response to your question.

[-] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I see, good point. You convinced me and I will edit my comments accordingly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Even not being a native speaker you should know the difference here.

[-] MurphysPaw@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

I fucking love the internet

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

It drives me nuts

Arrr...

insulting a whole group of innocent people

What innocent people are being insulted? The euphemism treadmill has ensured nobody is being legitimately described this way anymore, it is just an insult. Btw, idiot and stupid both used to be the correct medical terms for unusually slow mental development, it's just a matter of how much time has passed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

I wAnT a CrooK fOR PrSedEnt bC a CRoOk KnoW HoW cRooKs OpeRaTe And WiLL shUT thEm Down!

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"You're not the problem, it's those other guys" is a very appealing and hence powerful message that people want to believe (in fact, the worse things are, the more they want to believe it) so it easilly bypasses rationality.

You might have noticed that in America it's not just Trump using it or even just his party.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Well, that is what advertising and propaganda is.

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Eh... At this point it's more of a religion. People just believe what they want to believe. And that is the underdog who is the second coming of Jesus and will fix all problems that were created by immigrants.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 13 points 9 months ago

Insecure people want simple lies over complex truth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 13 points 9 months ago

For a conspiracy or a cover up to be real in this day and age it needs to be small, otherwise it just involves too many people to stay secret.

Trump and his “believers” are a different story. They know it’s not real, instead they’ve all silently (and not so silently) agreed to reject reality and substitute in their false god’s reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] neuroneiro@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Never forget this "man" was convicted of sexual assault & bragged about grabbing women by their genitals.

[-] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

How sad for them? I think @christophorious is projecting: how sad for the rest of us.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago
[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 40 points 9 months ago

He himself has one conviction (civil, not criminal) so far, for sexual assault on E. Jean Carroll.

The people around him (Bannon, Manafort, Flynn, Weisselberg, etc.) have many convictions, including guilty pleas. If you include the January 6th insurrection, hundreds of them.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 24 points 9 months ago

And his charity org being found fraudulent, etc.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Important note, it did not meet the legal definition of rape for NY because they define it specifically with sexual intercourse. In common terms however we'd of course call it rape.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Is that why his face is orange? Is he Bizzaro Trump? Did the Bizzaro universe steal our Trump and replace him with theirs?????

Edit: if he is not Bizzaro Trump can you imagine how decent of a person Bizzaro Trump would be?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
1296 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5345 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS