27

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/128452

It seems that there are at least 30 Million people that want a different experience than me.

Forbes described the Threads service with the following summary:

The most significant difference between the two platforms is the timeline, as Meta’s app only displays an algorithmic timeline—in a similar vein to Facebook and Instagram—and offers no option for a Twitter-like reverse chronological time showing the most recent posts.

The algorithm-driven timeline also displays posts made by accounts that the user does not follow—something that Twitter only restricts to its alternate “For You” timeline.

Threads is a mobile-only experience at the moment and users can only make posts, write comments and follow people on the platform’s mobile app, unlike Twitter, which allows all of this on its website as well.

Meta’s official blog announcing the launch of Threads also makes no mention of a native desktop or web browser experience, which is currently limited to seeing people’s posts and their profile pages.

Hashtags—a key element of Twitter’s identity and a feature that has permeated other social platforms including Facebook and Instagram—are not present on Threads, as the platform does not allow users to search for specific content.

This means that there is no “trending section” on Threads and the only way to discover content on the platform is based on what Meta’s algorithm decides to serve.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nlm@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

The biggest problem for me with the commercial social networks is the use of algorithms to try and spoon feed me with stuff.

I hate that. Let me follow people or stuff I like and then give me that in a chronological order, that's all I want. Stop injecting other stuff in my own curated feed, it really shouldn't be so hard..

Know what algorithm I want? Order by date created, descending. That's all I need. I'm okay if there is also a ranking by activity to show what's active.

I do not need social media to do anything else, no priority, no ranked users, no suggested posts. I want the raw feed, sorted by date created descending.

[-] UnhealthyPersona@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what made me leave Instagram years ago. When they changed it so you only get the algorithmic feed. I can't stand it, why can't we just choose the fucking sort order we want?? These platforms give users no control and it's what makes them so frustrating to try to use. Reddit was the last "social" platform I was really using and now that's gone to shit too.

[-] nlm@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

You can still get your follower feed in chronological order by clicking the instagram logo in the corner and selecting Followers or whatever it says. Can't make it the default though and it really sucks.

[-] 1000knives@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

i also absolutely feel this way, but i think more people like ~the algorithms~ than people like us suspect. you have no idea how many new people i’ve seen complain about this on mastodon. people show up, see a blank feed that they have to make an effort to populate, and turn around and leave. i think a lot of people enjoy frictionless spoonfed content a la the tiktok for you page these days…

[-] LucyLastic@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Aside from it sounding as horrible as Facebook, the rush of new users is probably because a) Instagram users can go straight in, b) curiosity, and c) oh god what is Elon thinking. They probably aren't aware of Mastodon. Or Lemmy.

[-] Ignacio@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I think it's a), but only because who has an Instagram account, automatically has a Threads account. There is no other way that 70 million people "joined" in just 3 days.

[-] ericjmorey@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

They are generally counting installations of the app. So it does take conscious effort to be one of the counted. But it's certainly less friction than most new services.

[-] ericjmorey@discuss.online 4 points 1 year ago

That's a fair assessment.

[-] retronautickz@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the fediverse microblogging alternatives have either three or four timelines, none of them algorithm-driven

[-] EthicalAI@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

That sounds useless

[-] ollien@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Someone on Mastodon raised a good point that the idea of "changing handles" is incompatible with a lot of fedi, too. I'm curious how they will tackle that problem when they eventually federate

[-] ericjmorey@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

Is the ability to change handles something that you want?

[-] ollien@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Me personally? Not really. But it's definitely a feature I've heard folks wanting.

[-] Hammy@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Meta/Insta/Threads has already confirmed that both chronological sort and "Follow Only" view are in the works.

[-] 1000knives@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

good to know, but it speaks a lot about their priorities that neither was there on launch, imo.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7500 readers
18 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS