359
submitted 10 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cosmicsoup 120 points 10 months ago

This article seems to gloss over the fact that wages really haven’t risen with inflation. There may be more job openings than unemployed people, but do those jobs pay a livable wage?

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago

If consumers are being forced into relative poverty because expenses are rising faster than incomes are, that is the definition of a bad economy. Whoever wrote this headline is bought and paid for.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 42 points 10 months ago

Exactly. Just having job in no way guarantees someone also has a home and food to eat ... which is some serious Black Mirror shit.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 23 points 10 months ago

If you work 40 hours you shouldn't need a 2nd job to survive. With the wealth America has you shouldn't have to work more than 30

[-] eek2121@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

This is part of the issue. My local grocery store pays $15/hour and mostly hires part time to avoid benefits.

1 bedroom apartments start at $1,200/mo. Most places require rent to be no more than about 33% of income. Don’t even get me started on gas/car, insurance, utilities, etc.

There is a huge disconnect.

The economy is NOT in good shape. It is according to metrics they choose to measure, but jobs that pay a living wage are very hard to come by.

[-] webhead@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

To be fair, it hasn't been good by THAT standard in decades probably. It just feels worse right now because there was a rise in wages for a bit there that was totally lost to inflation.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

When will we start talking about thriving wages?

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Wage growth outpaced inflation in 2023.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

How about the previous 10 yr stats?

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Not great, but better than the 10+ years before that. Wage growth has mostly been stagnant since the 1970's but there's occasional periods where it's done better. Like now, and I think about 10 years ago when a long period of crappy wage growth was broken following the GFC. It's one of the few genuinely good things about the economy recently, people are finally earning more and if that keeps up for a few more years a whole lot of people are going to see their lives improved.

[-] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Lol your whole argument that it's better now is based on your own argument it has been stagant for a decade and your pinnacle argument that fixes the mess is... 1 year of lukewarm wage growth? How the fuck does that fix anything?

Lol "few more years" .. you have nice jokes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You know what it looks like to me? It looks like you made a claim before double checking the evidence, and when you got called out, instead of just admitting you were wrong you double and then triple down with some of the dumbest attempts at arguments I've ever seen.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

I think wages have kept up with inflation, if I'm reading this chart correctly: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

It's normalized by CPI, so a flat line would be no wage growth.

Depends on the the sector, obviously. I'm guessing service sector wages have not kept up with inflation, since it seems like every place is understaffed (they're not offering enough to attract workers). I also don't think it accounts for part-time and gig worker wages.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The title itself is an act of gaslighting.

I'm gonna take a position for this comment that is a harder line than I usually would take on economic issues: if the consumer is not able to consume at the same rate because prices are going up faster than wages are, then the flow of money is not "good" as conventionally idealized in "the economy."

Thanks for the heads up Buffalox. Edited to finish the thought. Cell tower fuckery made it look like I had lost the comment.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

I think it should be clear that what he means is like the famous quote: "Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?"

[-] SnotFlickerman 82 points 10 months ago

~~Inflation~~ Capitalism has created a dark cloud over how everyday Americans view the economy

[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 72 points 10 months ago

A shitty economy that has forced people into paying more for less while corporations lie about the reason for inflation and rightfully soured everyday Americans view of the economy.

The value of the stock market and homes increasing does fuck all for people getting screwed at the grocery store.

I’m fortunate enough to get to benefit from both of those things, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to pretend the economy is great now because theoretical net worth has gone up.

[-] books@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago

Inflation, shrinkflation, record corporate profits, rising home prices, the billionaire class getting orders of magnitude richer, and my paycheck going up a mere three percent a year... thats sort of why I feel like the economy sucks a bag of dicks.

I'm still doing well. I have a house. I have a car. I have a job.... but in comparison I'm not moving forward. So that is why I feel like the economy sucks.

[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 13 points 10 months ago

"the economy" is not your economy or mine. If we made all our money from investments, we'd be doing ok. The growth in our wealth would be outpacing inflation.

Our wealth is tied to wages. As long as we impact someone else's bottom line, we won't be getting ahead, ore even keeping pace, with inflation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

"That discontent comes even as a strong labor market, appreciating home values and a stock market rebound has made some positive about their financial situation."

A strong labor market doesn't help you unless you're looking for a job.

Appreciating home values = increased rent for renters. Meanwhile, existing home owners can't sell because of high interest rates on loans.

Stock market rebound doesn't help people not in the stock market.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Property value has zero direct and real world connection to the cost of rent, rent is mostly about value and what the market can stand. Plenty of buildings, houses, etc have been owned long enough by whatever company/person/group that the operating expenses are way lower than you may expect. Where I am landlords are raising rent just because, unless they took out insane loans with hard money lenders, their operating costs have most definitely not increased at the same rate they are increasing rent.

As for selling. Again. You have no idea what you are talking about. Sellers don't have to deal with interest rates unless they are looking to use a mortgage to pay for a new place to live. If you are downsizing and/or moving to a lower cost of living area, you should be able to own outright without a loan. We are planning similar. We will not be surprised if sometime in the next few years we are offered 500k+ for our property and if/when that happens we will move further out of civilization and be setup for an easy and comfortable retirement.

A strong labor market helps everyone even those of us who already have a job. You need to educate yourself on how economies work. A rising tide lifts all boats.

You need to delete this comment and go seek help, take a hit from a joint/vape/etc or just take a nap.q

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This comment is so tone deaf and out of touch with reality that it's almost funny. Almost.

You literally just said landlords will use any reason they can to raise rent, it doesn't need to make sense, guy.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Says the person who clearly huffed paint first thing this morning. I didn't say anything about it making sense but it's clear who here understands this stuff and who doesn't.

As for the accusation of being tone deaf and out of touch. You have no idea what my situation is. For the record, we bought a small house and 3+ acres of land just before the pandemic, listing price was just shy of 100k in an country'ish outskirt of a midsized major city. There is enough development going on around us that we are fully expecting a developer to offer to buy our property at some point in the future, in which case we will downsize, sort of and either buy further out of civilization or invest the proceeds and move into an apt somewhere closer to places we want to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago

Everyone I know who's sold their house has done it within a week or two of putting it on the market and they got more than they were asking for. Other than that I agree with you.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

That's all fine and dandy if you downsize or go to a different area with a lower COL, but if you buy in the same market, you also pay more for the new house.

[-] StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And that extra money covers the original down payment, interest that was paid on the mortgage, closing costs, realtor fees, costs to repair, stage, and prep the house for sale, and down payment on the next mortgage. It's a never-ending cycle of spending for more debt. AKA the American Dream.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 35 points 10 months ago

is 'the economy' just cover for 'people who own stocks'? are they really ignoring the plight of the common man because some rich peoples stocks are a-ok?

no that can of water did not double in cost to market, but youre going to pay for it like it did.

feels like inflation has pointed out to the common man what a farce 'the economy' is.

[-] Poggervania@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago

It’s because the USA’s corporate owners like to obfuscate shit like that. The economy is doing well if all you’re looking at is GDP, stock market, and how profitable companies are.

However, a quick look at the Consumer Price Index shows how fucked the economy is for the citizens - but you never hear about the US’s really bad CPI score and how inefficient most markets are in the US.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

What specifically about the CPI are you referring to?

[-] StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You know, the....landing page that defines the CPI. I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Corporate disaster profiteering

[-] C126@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Overuse of the money printers.

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago

I think the analysis I've seen showed supply-chain disruptions was the cause for most of the inflation (first covid, then Russia-Ukraine war). Then, a significant portion was from increased corporate profits (if you're being generous, you could say companies increased their margins due to future uncertainty). There's also a new trend of deniable price collusion (algorithmic collusion, such as what Amazon has been doing). M2 money supply has been decreasing for the last 1-1/2 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

No that would be Donald’s thing. He printed the most money ever in the history of the goddamn country during his term of terror.

It’s a huge testament to Biden’s admin for the relatively soft landing we have had, one of the best in the G7. The thing is, we have another big problem: out of control corporate greed and late stage capitalism.

That problem is far bigger than anything Biden can do with a chaotic refuse-to-do-anything Congress who is paralyzed by minority extremists and Trump worshippers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

If "the economy" doesn't translate to the purchasing power of our labor, then it's a useless metric.

[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 14 points 10 months ago

... useful to them. LOL

Reminds me of the quote "If you're not making money in your sleep, you will work until you die."

This, I believe, is by design.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

More like shrinkflation/greedflation.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago

Yet they just set a new record for holiday spending?

Can it be any more obvious that the media is dooming for a Trump win?

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

It isn’t about the economy so much as it’s about

the goddamn out of control corporate greed by our oligarchs and their monopolies

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I just stopped buying stuff unless I absolutely need it.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

I really need to learn this discipline

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DLSantini@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago

"Inflation"

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Great, everyone is on the same page now.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Well, yeah.

If you agreed to work hard and sacrifice on the expectation that it would mean you could live with security and dignity and the promise wasn't fulfilled, that's the classic breach of the social contract.

Granted, the Dems (since the 1980s) have been enthusiastic partners in looking the other way when mergers&acquisitions led to monopoly or monopsony, and both parties have happily suppressed wages, and that's the damage done.

Now that the Dems are actually doing yeoman's work re: bolstering unions and raising wage minimums and checking monopoly abuse and price gouging and reining in the banks, OF COURSE the media are going to gamely report that high prices hurt but not mention that they're working on the problems in meaningful ways

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
359 points (100.0% liked)

News

23267 readers
2734 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS