761
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SayJess 112 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, the Panasonic Discman, the prime successor to the Phillips Walkman.

Glad I'm not the only one who got a twitchy eye reading that.

[-] SayJess 8 points 1 year ago

I thought to myself for the briefest of moments: Am I being Mandela Effect’d?

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago

I am really confused now. I know Discman is Sony's name, but generally people refer to any such portable CD player as "discman". At least where I live.
And it's not just regular people, even shops refer to them as dicmans.
Here are some examples to back my claims:

exampleshttps://www.alza.sk/discmany/18886534.htm
https://aukro.sk/discmany
https://www.mall.sk/discmany
https://discmany.heureka.sk/
https://www.okay.sk/collections/discmany

The only exception seems to be Nay, referring to this category as "Portable CD players".

[-] SayJess 14 points 1 year ago

That’s very interesting! Around me, we called them CD Players, it must be a regional thing. Many people called the portable cassette player a Walkman, even though that was a lineup of products from Sony.

Looking on US Amazon, there are several players that have Discman, Walkman, or both in the titles. Sony must not be enforcing their trademarks (wrong term?) for the first non-sponsored listing being called:

2000mAh Rechargeable Discman CD Player:Walkman CD Player…

[-] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

generally people refer to any such portable CD player as "discman". At least where I live.

Yeah, and there's people that call them Kleenex, Velcro, and iPads. That doesn't make them right.

There's no confusion - Discman is the model of Sony's portable CD players. People using the term incorrectly is simply that.

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Yepp, we all called them Discman back in the day regardless of the brand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pixel@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

At least it's not a sony ipod

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wasn't the actual "Discman" a Sony product? In the same line as their Walkman cassette players, but for CDs?

I had a Walkman back in the day; but never an official Discman player. All my CD players were pieces of shit 😩

[-] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. The pictured item is a portable cd player, not a Discman.

Apparently SL-SK420 or whatever that says didn't have the same ring to it.

[-] Donut@leminal.space 16 points 1 year ago

This is an interesting phenomenon called a proprietary eponym, where a brand name becomes synonymous with a product.

Just like walkman and disc man, in my language we call a car satnav a "TomTom" after the brand that popularised it here.

[-] mxcory 4 points 1 year ago

Here is the scene from the Clerks cartoon about adhesive strips.

https://youtu.be/wD6ZW05R9kY?si=G7DxsQtQf1iQ82mh

[-] Crozekiel@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago

This thing is so recent it could play MP3s... The first Discman was released in 1984. I'm actually really confused why they picked such a recent version, the technology was almost phased out when this thing was released. FFS the original iPod came out a year before this thing...

[-] Jubei_K_08@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Probably because they couldn't purchase the other ones at reasonable prices anywhere.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Here is one for $44. https://www.ebay.com/itm/256220081101

Surely a museum can afford that? Right?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

Is this your kid nephew's "museum"?

"Old" is not 20 years and that is not a goddamn discman. Sorry, Ralphie. You can do better.

[-] jpeps@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I think you're missing the point. Museums collect this stuff not because it's old, but because it was significant to people at the time and they want to collect it for prosperity. Imagine if they waited until 2050 and then said "Shit! Wasn't there a cd player we all liked at some point? Does anyone have one?" They should have one, they're a museum! Many museums will be maintaining an iPhone collection for example.

Regardless, most people under 30 likely do not have access to a cd player, and I'd guess many never owned one. It's not strange for that to be in a museum even without what I've said above.

[-] danielbln@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Sorry to be the one breaking the bad news, but you might be old yourself if you think like that. Don't sweat it, happens to all of us.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree with you. In the tech industry, 20 years is ancient. If you were born in 1985, 20 years prior that was 1965, and the tech of that decade was very different from the 80s tech.

Imagine someone living in a year where calculator watches were already a thing, and when in a museum displaying one of those radios in wooden cabinets and knobs with the style of the time they said "that's not old!!!!!!"

[-] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago

Man that one can play mp3 discs. That has to be newer than 2002. Burning CDs wasn't super common yet.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago

I had a aftermarket head unit that played mp3 cds in 2002.

I had a mp3 player in 1999.

We were definitely burning cds back then, this woulda come at a premium but the tech was there.

I remember downloading mp3s from usenet in 1999 on my Windows 95 computer. I'd start the download, go to work, then retrieve the file when I got home.

I felt so fancy buying a CD burner at Best Buy so I could burn them onto CDs. It was the first PC component I ever installed by myself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

My brother had an mp3 player in 1999. I think it had 16MB of storage space. I didn't see the point of it when you could only put like 5 songs on the thing.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

I could fit roughly 1 hour of music on mine, longer if I dropped the bitrate to 96kbps instead of 128.

The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast, no moving parts so it never skipped. This seemed super cool to me because I skateboarded and stuff and generally liked the idea of no skips.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] damium@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

I had that very device right about 2002. Put my whole CD collection on a few mp3 disks. Replaced it a few years later with a 6GB mp3 player.

[-] caesar_salad83@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Me too! I think it was around 2007 that i got an iRiver H10. My only other standalone music player I ever bought with my own money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] RadButNotAChad@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sure it was, in America at least. I think I got my first PC that could burn disks in like 1998 and it was a mass marketed Compaq from Circuit City. Napster showed up the next year and CD burning exploded. Napster was dead by 2001.

[-] xX_fnord_Xx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

My car around 03 had a shit cassette deck that ate tapes. The mp3 discman with a cassette adapter was a game changer.

I had the entire Atari Teenage Riot and Mindless self Influence discography on one disk.

I'm sure the bit rate was abysmal, but with that kind of music it is kind of a feature.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I had this exact model in 2002. It was a revelation and possibly one of the best portable CD players ever released. You could sit there and tap it all day and it wouldn't skip.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tischbein@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Does it belong in a museum if the essential same device is still sold? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07MDY28Q1/ I mean sure you can get a 200 year old coffee grinder… but that's 200 years not 22.

If I bought one today, I'd spend the extra $10 for a rechargeable unit. The one bad memory I have of these was having to replace the batteries so frequently.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

You can use rechargeable batteries in it... Built in rechargeable batteries suck. The entire lifespan of the device is tied to that battery. Give me something that runs on AAs any day.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Whoa...they have a USB-C rechargeable one.

You know, if they sold an audiophile one, with clean electronics, a good built in amp, and the ability to play FLAC files (microSD port), I'd buy one.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Check carefully. That might exist.

[-] mob@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Museum ≠ old.

I'm sure there are mp3 players in museums as well.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

The Colorado Railroad Museum has railroad crossing signals donated by BNSF that are only a few years old. Museums will gladly accept both old and new.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago

Wasn't Discman a Sony brand?

[-] Esqplorer@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Correct. This isn't labeled correctly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Laughs/Cries in cassette based Walkman.

Hold onto that. The cassette mechanisms that are produced now are absolute trash. There's literally no manufacturer on earth who makes a good one anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Kinda off-topic, but I honestly miss the in-line remotes high-end Discman & portable Minidisc players used to have..

Really wish they would make a come-back in some way, maybe as a supplemental Bluetooth device?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I had that exact model. Only CD player I ever bought new, portable or otherwise.

[-] synapse1278@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I had the exact same model !

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Couldn't they have picked one from the 90s at least

[-] Bread@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

I mean it was over twenty one years ago. Technology ages fast. You can also say it had historical significance so it can end up in a museum earlier than you might expect.

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That was legit the best MP3 CD player. It never skips no matter how much you shake it and it builds a different, but consistent shuffle playlist depending on what song was playing when you hit shuffle.

[-] Konstant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've seen consoles like the Sega Genesis and the Master System in a temporary exposition and end up taking photos since I haven't seen one for so long lmao

[-] RoseRose56@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I like the design, I got a Sony CD Walkman last month, and I love it.

[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Except this was at a time when a 16gb SD card was like $100

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had that exact model. And I was cool, wearing my over the ear headphones.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
761 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5826 readers
300 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS