736
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 313 points 1 year ago

Bridget, you deserve to be fired from your job because you are terrible at your job, not because you had sex with a woman,

I love this so hard. Epic burn.

[-] trslim@pawb.social 311 points 1 year ago

Sir, a second sex video has been found.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

I only opened the comments to see if anyone posted this yet lol

[-] KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago

I only opened comments to see if someone had made this comment

lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Appropriate use, haha.

[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 244 points 1 year ago
[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I wish I could upvote this twice.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] cobwoms 116 points 1 year ago

i haven't even been able to find the first one yet

[-] Haagel@lemmings.world 43 points 1 year ago

Commenting just in case there's an update to this breaking news story

[-] RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org 81 points 1 year ago

The embedded video of Zander Moricz is so good! Click the link and go watch it. If the first line doesn't sell you, nothing will:

"Bridget, our first interaction was when you retweeted a hate article about me from The Nationalist while I was a Sarasota County School student."

Hell of a way to open a comment!

[-] infinitevalence@discuss.online 29 points 1 year ago

If I ever do something dumb that requires this type of public hearing please make sure this kid is the one doing the public roasting.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago

Like she didn't see this cumming.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 71 points 1 year ago

The hypocrisy of the GOP is stunningly not stunning.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't like stereotyping, but they're consistently like... not only projection but worse.

And they say the same about us in r/conservative... Holy hell.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Gaslight Obstruct Project. It's a whole platform of deception.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why is police looking into this though?

Ah.. It's in the article. They found it in her husband's phone as he's being investigated for rape

In late November, a woman alleged that Christian Ziegler went to her apartment and raped her after his wife bowed out of a scheduled get-together.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

That’s disgusting… where did they even post these videos, which websites, I want to make sure I dont see it by mistake!!

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago

Fat Mac was the best

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago

Did she commit a crime that's her private life is being exposed? I know her husband is a rapist, but why are these videos being released?

Yes, she's a hypocrite, but what about her privacy? Her rights? That's YOUR privacy and YOUR rights too.

[-] klugerama@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

The videos aren't being released publicly. It's in the article.

Only Christian Ziegler, the police, and presumably the prosecutor(s) have access.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I think she's being accused of sexual assault by one of these women, so it's on the playing field now.

[-] thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Came here to say that. Two weights and two measurements i see

[-] Moondance@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago
[-] AgnosticMammal@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 year ago

Opens article, 190 comments.

Hoo boy.

More like moms for libido amirite

[-] squid_slime@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Here another great read and some back grounds of the situation, just in case anyone isn't clued up https://www.vanityfair.com/news/christian-ziegler-bridget-ziegler-rape-accusation-scandal

[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I’m going to need links to both to compare and contrast. Just to make sure it is the same person.

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago
[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

It has always been "Moms for Libertines". They just get confused by words.

[-] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think this former Sarasota county student said it best. https://youtu.be/yq4LMi5-C6o?si=eLUXLIJ92QrnCQQR

Really her hypocrisy is just laughable and no one should care or be involved with anyone else's bedroom activities.

She is pushing her hateful and hurtful agenda in Sarasota county public schools. Meanwhile, she sends her kids to private school.

!I'm a bit split on this the more I think about it. Her private life doesn't need to be put on blast, she's a horrible enough person without putting her hypocrisy in the spotlight. However, it is her piousness that she flaunts as her guiding principle to negatively affect and control the lives of others. So can they actually be separated.!<

I'm wrong about this. Just because she's a horrible person doesn't mean her private life should become public. Other than her husband's assault, nothing that was done should be a judgement against her and she doesn't deserve to have everything aired in the public.

And as an aside Zander Moricz, the kid from the video gives me hope and his graduation speech is well worth a watch. https://youtu.be/qpTVyozS7M0?si=ZSGIpcO8m8VPe6Ud

[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Are they going to be released?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe they were moms for lesbianism but somehow lose the meaning and started the hate.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
736 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2148 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS