1221
submitted 1 year ago by BachenBenno@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 105 points 1 year ago

And most of the time you'd be right.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't say all problems are because of capitalism. I do believe that most of the problems I face are exacerbated by capitalism.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Blaming everything on capitalism is oversimplistic and reductive, to be honest.

Climate collapse is a result of industrialization and not capitalism, to start. Unless you want to explain how Stalin and Mao were still burning coal.

[-] Elderos@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whatever social economic model which can funnel power and authority to the very top is bond to ruin us. Humans are too greedy to sit at the top of such hierarchies.

[-] Cowbee@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Yep, that's why decentralization is so important, and why leftist organizational structure ie decentralization and democratization of production is going to be so critical moving forward.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Besides what another commenter noted about indistrialization being product of capitalism and then fierce competition, here's one more thing:

Do you see all those green activists buying reusable bags? Taking their bottles, recycling everything? Well, this has already been there in the past, and most notably - in socialist countries. Pretty much till its death USSR, for example, heavily favored reusable things, there just weren't plastic bags and plastic bottles and all that waste, and recycling, especially of glass and metal and paper, was a super normal thing and people got money/trade-in for that.

[-] Cowbee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Capitalism and the Industrial Revolution are inseparable from one another. The failure of 20th century Socialist states to adequately address green energy goals can be attributed to rapid industrialization to attempt to keep pace with Capitalist entities.

Going forward, the reason why Green Energy isn't the standard in the US is due to oil companies, not efficiency. The profit motive stands in direct confrontation with the good of all.

That's just Climate Change, too. Capitalism's failures of hierarchical and consumerist nature will exist as long as Capitalism exists.

Not every problem is because of Capitalism, but many are, and at the end of the day this is just a meme.

[-] shrugal@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What kind of f*cked up argument is that? I don't think the climate models were quite as advanced back then.

They had no idea that influencing the global climate was even a possibility, so you can hardly judge the morality of their decision-making by how much CO2 they produced. Or do you want to blame them for not building enough solar panels as well?

The problem with capitalism in this regard is not that it produced a lot of CO2 back in the days, but that it won't stop even after learning about the destructive effects.

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago

The USSR totally knew about climate change being a thing. Climate change is not a "new thing". Oil companies have known about it for almost a century now, they built their oil rigs to withstand rising sea levels for example.

The USSR did know about it as well, at least since the sixties: https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_329370_smxx.pdf

Fedorov’s article appears to be one of the earliest direct engagements with the problems associated with climate change and, more specifically, anthropogenic climate change in the Soviet Union. However, this theme received more concerted discussion and debate from the early 1960s. Two meetings of particular note took place in Leningrad in April 1961 and June 1962, both of which were organised by the Main Geophysical Observatory in tandem with the Institute of Applied Geophysics and the Institute of Geography and brought together a range of Soviet scientists, including geographers, in order to discuss the ‘problem of the transformation of the climate’ (see Gal’tsov, 1961; Gal’tsov and Cheplygina, 1962).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Urist@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago

Wherever there is a need there is potential for exploitation by greed. Of course capitalists without a leash are going to wreak havoc on everything.

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Capitalism acts like a car hurtling down a highway with no brakes, powered by the roaring engine of industry.

Its insatiable thirst for growth and profits accelerates industrial activity to reckless speeds, steamrolling environmental concerns in its pursuit of relentless expansion.

Industry isn't the villain; it's merely the engine being pushed to its limits by capitalism's uncontrolled, destructive momentum.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Funnily enough, capitalist do the same thing. See a problem? Apply capitalism

[-] giggling_engine@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I disagree and I'll explain why for $20

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

And it's the root cause vast majority of the time.

Most times is Ronald Reagan, but yeah, capitalism in it's most exalted forms of exploitation is the reason.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

I'd encourage you to expand your worldview - a lot of problems we attribute to capitalism are mostly because of hierarchy.

load more comments (40 replies)
[-] mydude@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

It's funny cause it's true.

[-] galloog1@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

It's funny because it's the dominant system and any other proposed system would handle the respective situation worse on average but is highly situational. You get into arguments that devolved into, "well, there's massive starvation and war but at least we are all equal"

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're expressing the notion of "capitalist realism" which is argued to be an effect of neoliberal ideaology. The idea that not only is capitalism the only viable solution, but you can't even imagine a viable alternative. There's a book of the same title that you'd probably get a lot out of since it might make you more critical of ideas you may have taken for granted, which is my personal favorite kind of book.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (27 replies)
[-] norgur@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

Well, you're usually in the general vicinity of the root cause of any problem by that assumption.

[-] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 13 points 1 year ago

The greatest crimes are caused by excess and not by necessity.

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
1221 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

49694 readers
1215 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS