130
submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 106 points 9 months ago

“Every dollar you set aside will compound.”

Out of touch as fuck. If the fees don't take it, the inflation will.

[-] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago

It compounds their profits as they make more from the deposit than you! That’s what he really means.

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Use a brokerage like Fidelity as your bank instead of these fuckers at Chase and BofA who don't respect you despite you giving them your money.

Doesn't have to be Fidelity, but in the current day if you're not getting the following from your bank you're getting fucked:

  • $0 minimum balance, $0 in account fees
  • No overdraft fees
  • Minimum 4% APY on savings, minimum 2% APY on checking
  • ATM fee reimbursement
  • Instant transfers between your own accounts
  • Access to direct deposits even while they're still pending
[-] Kiernian@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Where does one get something like this in the U.S.?

no min balance, no fees, interest on checking?

I was under the impression that didn't exist.

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Fidelity is who I use since they also have my portfolio, but SoFi and many others also provide similar services.

[-] Rice_Daddy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

These are some of the most basic features for the UK.

[-] JDubbleu@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

They're pretty basic here too. That doesn't mean there aren't scummy ass banks that still don't offer them, and rely on the company name to get customers. Many old banks don't offer most of this unfortunately, and most people don't go looking for new banks often and get screwed.

[-] Rice_Daddy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Basic finance is easily one of the most important life skills anyone can pick up, right ght besides cooking and understanding when people might not have your best interest in mind.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

It’s not out of touch. The problem is we do a shit job of teaching people the basics of budgeting and how to save in our culture.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 106 points 9 months ago

It's not just 'doom spending.' There is next to nothing to do without spending money anymore. Pretty much the only free things anymore are city parks in good weather and libraries all year around. I have a 13-year-old. She's constantly looking for things to do. There's so little for her to do for free. She's in online school, so sometimes it's nice to get out of the house and go to a cafe to do her schoolwork. $15 minimum every time.

[-] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Idk about you but every activity is about $100/month too. I have kids in dance, $100/month per kid. Same with swim lessons (yes at the YMCA too). Looked into ice skating lessons and it's the same. I want my kids to be able to try things but there's no way we can afford to do more than one activity at a time and that's a stretch sometimes.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Yep. She has drum lessons once a week. That's all we can afford. And that's just her and a drum teacher, so it's not even like it's a ton of social interaction. I'd love to get her to do other classes and things like that, but we can't afford them.

[-] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Yeah and that's another barrier, start up cost. Instruments are expensive. I grew up playing hockey and if I want my kids to try it it's around $2000 just for one season.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

We were (somewhat) lucky on that end. Her drum teacher sold us a simple drum set for $500 a couple of years ago and we've just added bits to it since then. Considering how much drum sets can cost, that was a bargain.

But we also had two incomes at the time. We're down to one now.

[-] SynAcker@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

As a percussion instructor, it makes me happy that you are investing in your child's talent by getting them lessons!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Thanks! She really likes it. I think it's a good way for her to get aggressions out that she has trouble getting out in other ways.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Only $100/mo? You're lucky! My nephews' tennis and violin lessons are way more than that. Like multiple times more. You must live in a LCOL area.

[-] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

And then, there's Lemmy that's free! 🧐

Just kidding, I'm not disagreeing with you

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

That's kind of the sad part really. She doesn't use Lemmy, but she basically spends her free time, when she's not doing other solo activities like drawing, on social media so she has a way to 'hang out' with her friends. In her case, she doesn't even get to see her friends in school anymore (pulling her out was very necessary and partially her choice). If she wants to spend time with friends and doesn't want to do it with parents hanging around, and I don't blame her for wanting that, pretty much the only free thing she can do at this time of the year with them is walk around the mall and window-shop. In other words, the main free thing for kids to do is wish they had money.

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

In other words, the main free thing for kids to do is wish they had money.

To be fare it was the same way for me as a kid in the 80s

Luckily we still had alladins castle and Sega cities back then so we could at least play some games between wanting a cd or something from hot topic.

[-] young_broccoli@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

What about finding a band?
Even if she is still a very begginer I've seen that playing in a band can help you improve faster and learn other skills necessary as a musician (specially for drummers imo) also I made my best friendships and had the most fun while playing in a band.

PS: In case you havent done it; swapping the drum heads for good "brand name" ones can really improove a cheap drumkit, that and new cymbals (cymbals are the weakest part on any cheap drumkit).

[-] Kit 3 points 9 months ago

Public schools have plenty of extracurriculars for free or cheap. It sounds like online school is holding back your child from the kind of experiences she's looking for.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 27 points 9 months ago

You apparently have no current connection to public schools. All of the extracurricular activities cost money since the districts lost funding for them. Band? Uniform fee and instrument rental. Sports? Uniform and equipment fees. Dance, cheerleading, theater, etc. gotta pay since the school no longer has a budget.

[-] Kit 2 points 9 months ago

Clubs are typically free. Chess club, book club, tabletop gaming, etc. Additionally there is typically financial assistance for the fees, and regardless it's cheaper than pursuing these activities outside of a school setting. $100/no for a drum tutor would translate to an entire school year of many extracurriculars.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Kind of hard to have extracurricular activities when the student body is spread throughout the entire state.

[-] Kit 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah exactly. I did online school for high school and feel like I really missed out since I couldn't join any clubs or participate in activities in-person.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I realize she'll miss out, but she was being so severely bullied in her school that she couldn't face another day, so we had to take her out. And now we need to give her time to heal.

[-] Kit 2 points 9 months ago

Social isolation is also horrifically harmful to adolescents. Sounds like there's a better path here that allows your kiddo to get back into society and set her up for success in the future.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Maybe eventually, but not until she heals. She can't handle public school right now.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago

This banker seems like someone that doesn't understand our economic realities. Nothing worth saving for is in reach, everything is more expensive, we're saddled with a cumulative trillion dollar debt, and most of us don't even make enough money to save money. Of course I'd rather live in the moment and make the people around me happy.

[-] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's basic Econ 101. People buy more in high inflation periods because they know the same goods will cost more in the future.

ETA: I myself have bought sneakers in future sizes for my kids as well as household consumables and toiletries (meaning, not gifts) this Black Friday.

[-] billy_bollocks@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

You make a good point about people who are informed or educated enough to actually recognize that. Ignoring the future vs present worth of money aspect.

There are a shit ton of folks out there who don’t know what inflation actually is. I’d say they probably fall into the doom spending category.

[-] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 30 points 9 months ago

From the article (saved you a click):

KEY POINTS

  • Nearly all Americans are concerned about the current state of the economy.

  • Still, many continue to spend more and save less.

  • “Doom spending” may be one way to cope with stress as economic fears mount, however, it comes at the expense of your financial well-being.

Still, many continue to spend more and save less.

That's what happens when literally everything costs more than it used to.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That may be part of it but isn't a full explanation. For instance black Friday spending increased by 7.5% compared to last year, whereas inflation increased 3.2% over the last year.

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/28/black-friday-weekend-shopping-turnout-soars-to-a-record.html

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_11142023.pdf

People are increasing their consumption still.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

Eh, given the sales that go on black Friday, people may have been saving for large but necessary purchases. That black Friday was as big as it was is also a sign that people are trying to save a buck.

I know I picked up a washer and dryer, and not much else

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You may be right, October retail sales growth was weaker and something like 2.6% growth (just under the 3.2% inflation) as described in articles linked by the posted article. Forecasts are for all holiday spending to reach record levels this year beyond just what inflation would suggest. When the year finishes there will be more concrete data beyond just black Friday to find out for sure.

I think doom spending is a reasonable idea.

I think another piece is increasing wages. Those increased on average year over year in October by 5.2%. So many people probably feel individually they can afford the increased prices and buy even more on top. Though if you're in an industry or situation where you haven't been able to leverage the high labor demand and low unemployment for increased wages like most across the entire economy have been able to, you're probably hurting.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I think, if the data is granular enough, you could see it in what people were buying. Of half the sales were in DVDs and grown-up-toys, then yeah, it’s doom spending.

But I doubt anyone whose pay check to pay check or even remotely close just went out and drop loads of cash on things that weren’t either vaguely needed or budgeted into savings.

Outside of Black Friday, spending increases are accounted for by increase in food and energy inflation- not to mention the cost of debt- especially revolving debt.

Also consider, that the 5% gains you cite probably include people that don’t really need them. The rest of us see a net loss compared to inflation- maybe not yoy, but compared to the last three years certainly. Rememebe the whole point raising interest is to both reduce demand and reduce increases in pay. (After all, it’s all the consumer’s fault and not at all greedy corporations fixing the prices of eggs… which are pretty much used in every kitchen.)

This year no toys for me- rather it was very much needed appliances.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"the rest of us see a net loss compared to inflation"

The data suggests most people have not seen a net loss compared to inflation. Agreed you would need more granular data to know for sure, in case the mean was too influenced by outliers. So I looked up median too which are seeing similar rates of wage growth. So no that doesn't appear to be the case. Most people are not seeing a net loss compared to inflation. If you back up to three years ago, when we had a period of rapidly lowering inflation as the entire economy shut down, oil was literally being given away, and people were getting additional checks and tax credits in the mail, then yes you're right, real wages still lag about three percent. If you compare to four years ago, December, 2019, a more normal economic situation just before the pandemic, then wages have fully compensated for inflation in comparison to then.

https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2023/median-weekly-earnings-increased-5-7-percent-over-the-year-ending-in-the-second-quarter-of-2023.htm?mf_ct_campaign=yahoo-synd-feed

Real wages 2019 December https://stats.bls.gov/news.release/archives/realer_01142020.pdf

Real wages October 2023 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/realer.pdf

Things should also continue to get better, as wage growth has been outpacing inflation again since January 2023.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1351276/wage-growth-vs-inflation-us/

You also mention well maybe low wage workers aren't getting the increase. It's actually the opposite, lower wage earners have seen more of the wage increase.

https://www.epi.org/publication/swa-wages-2022/

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

I think there's a real argument to be made in favor of the doomspending hypothesis, particularly with younger millenials and housing. If you accept that you're simply not going to be buying a house any time remotely soon, the temptation grows to just say fuck it and go buy some nice stuff or go on a trip.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

Speaking with an n of 1, I've certainly noticed I tend to spend more impulsively when stressed. Definitely a theory.

[-] MeowyNinhaj 9 points 9 months ago

I spent much of my savings on random computer parts because inflation is so bad anyway it feels worthless. And the future is bleak. I enjoy the fancy monitors ect now a lot more than an extra number in the bank they just use as loan collateral for someone else.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Do you even need an explanation

[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

And places additional pressure on the very systems one could fear collapsing.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Not doom spending, doomed spending

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)

News

22852 readers
3330 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS