196
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 86 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Tbf, he should abdicate to a younger Democrat. I don't want to "settle for Joe".

I was pissed when Bernie Sanders had the rug pulled out from under him.

I really want to consolidate, but not under Joe Biden.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago

I want change. I want new ideas. Progress and solutions. Biden has been in government for over fifty years- most of that in the senate for over 40 years.

He’s been a senator longer than I’ve been alive

It’s not a question of age. It’s a question of stagnation.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

I'll take stagnation over fascism. What is the short term plan? I mean, what happens if the orange blob snakes his way back in because the purity ponies and the "independents" stomped their feet and had a hissy?

If that guy and his cohort get back in, it is most likely over for real elections in America.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

Stagnation is just the slow road to fascism.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] LordR@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago

Then vote for someone else in the primaries. But as soon as it is the general election it is either the democrat or fascism. Even if you don't vote at all, it will just strengthen the fascist party.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago

There's no Democratic primary this year.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

You’re right about what we have to do, but are we even having primaries this time? Because of how the primary process was scheduled in 2020 Biden had the nomination all but locked up by the time I got to vote in them. I’m 100% voting for Biden, you can look into my comments and find me admonishing some asshole advocating for third party presidential candidates over Biden. But I do understand the frustration with having to vote again for someone I didn’t want the first time and isn’t representative of the direction I want the country to move in besides not wanting to be in a fascist theocracy.

[-] LordR@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

That is a fair point. The primary system as well as the election system as a whole should probably reformedbut that is nearly impossible without flipping a lot of States.

I'm from Switzerland and we had a similar voting system for a long time. It was only changed by implementing more ways for the populace to directly decide about matters in both the Cantons (States) and Switzerland as a whole. So this might be a good way to implement change as it gives people a specific matter to vote on.

In Switzerland it was made possible by populists that wanted a more direct democracy.
So I hope something like this is possible for the US as well as many things like legalized weed, abortion access, a good health insurance system or voting reforms often have a stable majority among the voters, they just don't vote accordingly.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

I want to vote to change the voting system. We deserve to vote for who we trust with the job rather than against the candidate we fear most.

I have to compartmentalize pretty hard each election cycle. I wish I had time to campaign for a voting system change, but I haven't.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago

That would nearly guarantee a win for Trump. Incumbency advantage is strong as is name recognition. I don't like Biden either but he's better than a literal fascist. If Trump wins in 2024 there will not be an election in 2028.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I think Biden is a literal fascist.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Should have been Bernie. SMH

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

More of this nonsense. Spent a fair bit of time on Reddit explaining to folks that few young people turned out for Bernie in the primary. That space was/is replete with apologists digging every conspiracy out of the book instead of acknowledging that Biden simply drew the most votes. And then of course there's a bit of obviousness that never gets addressed: Trump handing Bernie his ass.

Here we are again. Where are the primary voters? Seems a handful of people care to make noise over the results but only a fraction of that number even care to turn out for them. What does turn out is that most people don't end up giving a fuck about voting anything but the presidential election.

I'm sure the collective delusion feels good to immerse oneself in though.

[-] Why9@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

There was no Biden to begin with. Bernie starts gaining traction and then, what? Biden comes out of the woodwork at the 11th hour to split the dem vote and gets bankrolled to prevent a far-left and progressive democrat party. Yeah, he was running on donations from the public, but he was absolutely gaining traction. He absolutely was sabotaged.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

Yes? Biden won a lot of moderate states on Super Tuesday, and then a bunch of milque toast candidates dropped out and endorsed the same. Sanders strategy was to gain momentum in the early bellwether and had some success. It just didn't translate country wide, and South Carolina showed the beginning of that pretty clearly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There were shenanigans to sink Bernie's ship. That being said, while I'd have been happy with him, there's no way he could've won looking at the map in hindsight. So I'm glad because Biden is better than another four years of Trump.

You're 100% correct that all the enthusiasm online didn't turn out young voters in the primary, and all the complaints about old people winning elections are mostly from the same demographic that didn't turn out to vote. They turned out in slightly greater numbers than usual but there is an untapped well of political power to change things if young people actually got each other to vote.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

It won't work. Conceding the already filled chair is seen as a weakness and they will parade that thought around. We know better, but they will not let the Dems live it down. It's the Dem nomination in 28 that matters. This year is Joe and maybe Trump. Depending on the stupidity of the Reps.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago

Here's the thing - what is the viable alternative? We are talking the orange blob otherwise, which means fascism, and the end of democracy in this nation.

Is Biden perfect? Of course not. Is he too old? Yeah, most likely. All the purity ponies and the so-called "independents" that are setting us up for another "win" (EC only) of the orange blob are not really thinking this through...

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

This is where I'm at. Biden is not my preferred candidate, but I don't see a better alternative stepping up. Witmer, Newsome, Shapiro, etc have all opted not to run. Joe Biden is the strongest candidate running for president that can and has beat Trump, end of story. I'd love to live in a world where I can vote for a young progressive in the 2024 general election, but we simply don't live in that world. The focus should be on pushing Biden to the left, not complaining that he's taking the place of some imagined candidate that doesn't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I want to preface this by saying I'm voting for Biden.

All the purity ponies and the so-called “independents” that are setting us up for another “win” (EC only) of the orange blob are not really thinking this through…

So, those people still exist. The party still needs their votes. Browbeating ain't gonna bring them on board. Is the party going to try appealing to them, or does it prefer Dictator Trump to lowering itself to treating the left like valued constituents?

I'm voting for Biden. But I'm also disappointed that the stuff he ran on was gleefully jettisoned by the congress that he said would work with him because of his experience. The people who are happy that minimum wage stayed put and most of BBB was gutted are now turning around and being like "vote for us! you have no choice!" and it looks for all the world like they're taking advantage of the situation.

People are giving up. Out of apathy, out of disgust, because they feel betrayed. Fuck, I'm voting for Biden and I'm feeling apathetic, disgusted, and betrayed.

Biden has 11 months to turn this around. His supporters who are demanding unquestioning happiness from everyone who has been let down by this administration aren't moving that needle in the direction that gets him re-elected. But damn, does it feel good to browbeat people who see what's coming if the party doesn't alter course.

This last sentence is the fourth time I'm going to mention that I'm voting for Biden, and I expect all four will be ignored.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] mochisuki@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

The alternative is PRIMARY HIM. That ass doesn’t deserve our vote and his hubris that he will get it no matter what is driving this country into a game of chicken with madness. He must retire and the only way he will listen is if we credibly refuse to support him NOW

[-] Heir_Of_Isildur@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Didn't he initially say he was going to be a one termer? If so, he should keep his word. Either way, he should be primaries.

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 months ago

How many times do we have to keep voting for the lesser evil. The more years I've been doing this the more voting for the lesser evil I hear.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago

It says a lot that this piece doesn’t even acknowledge Biden’s advocacy for Israel’s genocide as any kind of factor in his sinking support.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Trump's people think Biden is holding back and that we should be assisting Israel even more. There are Evangelicals who believe that we should nuke the whole Middle East to bring about the end times.

I really don't see not voting for Biden

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gastationsushi@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

Biden started out well in 21 and 22 because he tried to appeal to his progressive base. That being said, Biden is a fucking moron if he believes his neolib pivot didn't hurt his poll numbers.

It's not too late, Biden needs to pivot back to progressive policies instead of this blame the voters BS like Hillary tried. Blame leaders, not voters.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago

So, you have a choice. a less than perfect candidate, or someone who has already endorsed the idea of suspending the Constitution and A-bombing Palestine.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I expect to have more options on my ballot.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

Why? When have you ever had a perfect candidate? I like what NYC ex-mayor Ed Koch said. "If you agree with me 51% of the time, vote for me. If you agree with me 100% of the time, see a doctor."

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

I will vote for a progressive, if trump is elected its on the center dems for failing.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

fuck the hill, right wing owned and biased trash

Just look at the word they chose for the title, implying they are just shouting down any dissent at all. Fuck these media fascist lovers

Another example: https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/18/media/jimmy-finkelstein-the-hill-ukraine/index.html

Beyond his relationship with Solomon, Trump, and Giuliani, Finkelstein (owner) was Solomon’s direct supervisor at The Hill and created the conditions which permitted Solomon to publish his conspiratorial stories without the traditional oversight implemented at news outlets. And he has kept a watchful eye on the newspaper’s coverage to ensure it is not too critical of the President.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 10 months ago

Except for Tom Daschle who gave a pretty non-committal response, the names in this article seem like nobodies. Why are the statements of random consultants a news story? Who cares what the "deputy campaign manager for John Kerry’s 2004 presidential run" or a "senior policy adviser at Holland & Knight and former senior policy adviser to Vice President Harris" says?

I sure hope these aren't the names that come up when someone asks "who are Biden's closest allies".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

If you don't like Joe Biden, they only way to tell the Democratic party to change is by voting for Jill Stein.

They will keep sabotaging the primaries to get trash like Joe Biden until you leave and make them change.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

LOL, the Russian cutout? No THANK YOU.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

This type of mentality is how Trump gets re-elected. And it's looking more and more like it will be the end of democracy in the US if that happens.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, Joe Biden is how Trump can get re-elected. This wouldn't be a problem if you didn't vote for terrible candidates like Joe Biden in the first place.

[-] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Last time was literally a choice between Biden and Trump. You're saying by voting in the guy who wasn't Trump, we gave Trump the presidency? So, we should have simply allowed him to win with his highly mobilized and motivated supporters? That's a brilliant strategy, I wonder how that would have played out. Surely, an awesome third option would have magically appeared at the last second and won it all, right? Like, what do you even want from people? You don't like Trump, but you also don't like when people vote against him. If people hadn't voted Biden in, though, we'd already be in another Trump presidency right now.

It sounds like what you're advocating is that we had a better front-runner than Biden in the first place, one so amazing that they'd obviously blow Trump right out of the water. I also want that, but we didn't/don't and we as voters have no control over who runs, that's just wishful thinking. Yes, we should have better candidates. Where are they? In the meantime, we have no choice but to take the reality that we have, even if it means biting our tongues and voting for Biden again. It will once again come down to Biden vs Trump and to let Trump run away with this one would be a big mistake.

load more comments (59 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
196 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18917 readers
3304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS