223
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Shawdow194@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago

OLED tech gets better every year

Built in pixel shifts and better hardware is making burn-in on OLEDs a lot more comparable to the normal amount of burn-in LCDs and plasmas experience

If you can afford it, OLED everytime for everything imo

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Not quite everything.

Garmin has transflective screens for their watches that are not only better on the battery life, but become MORE visible in sunlight. Resolution is not nearly as good but I think for an exercise/health device that's acceptable. For some reason though, probably because the amoled screens look nicer in the store, those are considered "premium".

I think eink for any significant reading instead of OLED. Boox has an android tablet with a color screen, even though the colors are washed out looking. Eink is easier on my eyes for reading books and I'm hoping to get that tablet for reading Lemmy too since I end up looking at the screen so long.

OLED for pretty much everything else. Though the black smearing was slightly annoying in VR, the switch to LCD lost a lot with the blacks not looking black, more like gray. I hope they switch back to OLED.

[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

This is the reason I'm still using my old Pebble Time Steel. Garmin is the only one producing quality watches with transflective displays, and I don't like their OS :(

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah if you are a regular consumer the software in their watches is a bit disappointing, but you get used to it. For example, they JUST added pictures to notifications, and you still can't type a response to texts, just a few premade responses.

If you're a programmer, it's even more frustrating. I struggled to write a weight lifting app on Samsung's Tizen, but I was eventually successful. Not so much with Garmin. Garmin does not allow for SQL databases (just key value pair), and worse, they give such a small amount of space to save data it's almost worthless. I think with mine, one of their top end watches, they give like enough space for me to save a few hundred sets. Sounds like a lot but it's basically like ten visits to the gym and then it would have to delete stuff. They do have another method, but I was unable to figure out how to work with their fit files.

So yeah they make great watches but I wish they would put some time in to make the user and programmer experience a bit better.

[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm confused, and I suspect it's from limited understanding here, but smartwatches are typically paired with a phone, so wouldn't it make more sense to offload dataset handling like you're describing to the smartphone than any onboard storage/memory in the watch?

Or is that part of the odd jank of some smartwatch systems atm that they don't interoperate like that?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have been hearing this for years now and all OLEDs still burn in like crazy from normal use on phones. They are probably great for people who like to needlessly upgrade every few years, but I'm not sold on them anymore.

[-] Raxiel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I've had the same OLED screen daily driver since the first week of 2018, no burn in or any other problems.
They're not all bad.

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Been using amoled for few yrs now, on my previous and current phone. Have never experienced any burn in or heard any burn in complaints on mobile before. Don't know what was your experience but its definitely exaggerated.

[-] A_Porcupine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I've had OLED phones since the Nexus 5 and have only had burn-in once, which was on the Nexus 5. It was due to me enabling the dev option to never turn the screen off. After 2 weeks of the screen being on 24/7 there was burn-in from the top bar.

[-] Schorsch@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

The Nexus 5 did not have an OLED screen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EnderofGames@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

AMOLED phone from 2014 with no burn in. Had to replace some components to keep it alive, screen is still original.

I think it has to do with brightness. I only turn it up when I'm in the sun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GnomeKat 49 points 1 year ago

I been using oled for years on phones/laptops... never noticed any burn in. The issue seems like a chronically online nitpicking more than anything that a real user will encounter.

[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I was under the impression that this was only really an issue when they first introduced OLED. And doesn't really affect the current gen

[-] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

it can affect current Gen, it's just way harder to the point it doesn't really matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rimjob_rainer@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

For how long do you use your phones? If you have an OLED android phone you'll definitely get burn in where the status/notification bar is. If you get a new phone every 2 years you won't notice it. I've got it after around 4 years.

[-] d00ery@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've got a Samsung Note 9 from Sept 2018 (I checked the serial number) with an AMOLED screen and no burn in. I have turned off the always on display and spend a fairly normal amount of time on it. Not sure if I'm just lucky.

[-] gens@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Got an s9. It's got some globe from its previous owner and two bars from me. It's not a big deal really.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] StephniBefni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Had my phone for a few years now, no burn in yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Froyn@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

I vote that the next generation of computer monitors bring back the degauss button.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Even if it's a fake effect, I'd still buy the first flatscreen that does this.

[-] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago

Which doesn’t make sense still unless you play games with no hud. It’d take 1 Factorio session to burn in

[-] Rin@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

To be fair, my Factorio sessions are days long because I just get too addicted.

[-] Johanno@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

If you play factorio the burn in wouldn't matter because you don't need anything than the factorio ui!

[-] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The factory must grow!

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Serious question, why not? Do they produce some harmful flicker or something?

[-] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

burn in with static ui elements - The idea is, that regular very different images reduces the risk.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 year ago

Static UI elements you say?

Like games have?

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 year ago

Yea, but people don't play the same game non-stop for 8 hours… actually, never mind.

[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Some screens have pixelshifting to mitigate this. Also, burn in doesn’t happen as quickly as you might think.

Now, you wouldn’t want to go using an OLED for a billboard.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

So the same issue we've always had with crt, lcd, and plasma.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Actually a different issue. With CRTs and plasma, burn-in would actually burn an image into the phosphors of the screen.

OLEDs will slowly burn out after continued use, usually starting with the blue LEDs, giving a similar appearance, but not exactly the same (for example, you can only see the image persistence when displaying an image).

LCDs don't have either issue, but sometimes crystals can get stuck in a specific orientation, leading to (usually temporary) image retention. Gets worse in very cold weather. This is rare, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

So the parts of the screen that rarely ever change might be burned in...with the image of the thing that is almost always in that spot anyway...

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

But OLED dark mode looks so much better!

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 18 points 1 year ago

I just watched the RTINGS video on burn-in and understand the repurcussions of my flippant attitude.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa7V_OOu6B8

Interesting watch. She recommends only use the monitor for gaming, but NYEH!

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That was a cool video. But if it takes over 5000 hours of time on. I doubt that as a regular user you're going to see any significant or noticeable degradation but after several years. 5000 is just 208 days, but it has to be continuous and severe. More realistically, with off time and varied usage, the effect will never be as dramatic as with testing. So, it doesn't sound like something critical. CRTs were worse and people coped just fine. Just use your monitor.

[-] seathru@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Sounds like it's time to break out the bouncing word screensaver again.

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

With my old plasma tv if I ever started to notice burn in I would set it to a channel with no signal so it would do the static “snow”. It forces every pixel on the screen to go full spectrum by alternating between white and black. Leaving it like that for like 5-10 mins would greatly reduce noticeable burn in. TV is still going strong after 14 years of doing this.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's a genius use for static

[-] noride@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Newer OLEDs are also far less susceptible to burn in than older generations, I think much of the concern is still stigma from earlier models.

With that said, I'm sure I am not alone in saying I have a rather old OLED that I've just used as a normal every day monitor and haven't experienced any issues in the 6+ years I've had it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] afk_strats@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

TLDR: I took the plunge on OLED TV in 2021 as a primary monitor and it's been incredible

I've been using an LG C1 48" OLED TV as my sole monitor for my full-time job, my photography, and gaming since the start of 2021. I think it's at around 3000 hours of screen time. It averages over 10 hours of on time per weekday

It typically stays around 40 brightness because that's all I need, being fairly close to my face the size. All of the burn-in protection features are on (auto dimming , burn-in protection, pixel rotation) but I have Windows set to never sleep for work reasons.

Burn in has not been a thing. Sometimes, I leave it on with a spreadsheet open or a photo being edited overnight because I'm dumb. High brightness and high contrast areas might leave a spot visible in certain greys but by then, the TV will ask me to "refresh pixels" and it'll be gone when I next turn the TV on. The task bar has not burned in.

Experience for work, reading, dev: 8/10

Pros: screen real estate. One 48" monitor is roughly four 1080p 22" monitors tiled.The ergonomics are great. Text readability is very good especially in dark mode.

cons: sharing my full screen is annoying to others because it's so big. Video camera has to be placed a bit higher than ideal so I'm at a slightly too high angle for video conferences.

This is categorically a better working monitor than my previous cheap dual 4k setup but text sharpness is not as good as a high end LCD with retina-like density because 1) the density and 2) the subpixel configuration on OLED is not as good for text rendering. This has never been an issue for my working life.

Experience with photo and video editing: 10/10

Outside of dedicated professional monitors which are extremely expensive, there is no better option for color reproduction and contrast. From what I've seen in the consumer sector, maybe Apple monitors are at this level but the price is 4 or 5x.

Gaming: 10/10

4K 2160p120hz with 3ms lag, perfect contrast and extremely good color reproduction.

FPSs feel really good. Anything dark/horror pops A lot of real estate for RTSs Maybe flight sim would have benefited from dusk monitor setup?

I've never had anything but a good gaming experience. I did have a 144hz monitor before and going to 120 IS marginally noticable for me but I don't think it's detrimental at the level I play (suck)

Reviewers had mentioned that it's good for consoles too though I never bothered

Movies and TV: 10/10 4K HDR is better than theaters' picture quality in a dark room. Everything I've thrown on it has been great.

Final notes/recommendations This is my third LG OLED and I've seen the picture quality dramatically increase over the years. Burn-in used to be a real issue and grays were trashed on my first OLED after about 1000 hours.

Unfortunately, I have to turn the TV on from the remote every time. It does automatically turn off from no signal after the computers screen sleep timer, which is a good feature.

This TV has never been connected to the Internet... I've learned my lesson with previous LG TVs. They spy, they get ads, they have horrendous privacy policies, and they have updates which kill performance or features... Just don't. Get a streaming box.

You need space for it, width and depth wise. The price is high (around 1k USD on sale) but not compared with gaming monitors and especially compared with 2 gaming monitors.

Pixel rotation is noticeable when the entire screen shifts over a pixel two. It also will mess with you if you have reference pixels at the edge of the screen. This can be turned off.

Burn in protection is also noticable on mostly static images. I wiggle my window if it gets in my way. This can also be turned off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

Have 48" oled as my main monitor only 2 1/2 years old and 4500 hours, no burn in yet but tbh my last lcd monitor burned in quicker (was an ultrawide had a line down the middle after a couple years from split screening windows). When It does I don't think I'll mind, was the cheapest upgrade from my last monitor with all features I wanted

[-] Bondrewd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think people who can afford oled will be able to afford a new one 2 years later when it burns in.

I want oled TV just because I get a ginormous screen for like totally acceptable prices. I dont need 2 monitors or whatever.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Should this be a concern for my steam deck acquisitions?

[-] Kit 17 points 1 year ago

No. Check out the video of the guy who left his Switch OLED on nonstop for a year. Expect similar results from the Steam Deck. (Spoiler: You have nothing to worry about.)

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Great, I'll just be concerned by the price tag then

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Welcome to like... a decade ago?

[-] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just one decade? Screensavers were literally invented for this.

[-] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Screensavers were invented for vacuum tube televisions. Lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
223 points (100.0% liked)

memes

10677 readers
2327 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS