394
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Had Donald Trump been the U.S. president hosting this week’s APEC meetings, I have no doubt that the headline from the event would have been unchanged. It would have been: “He’s a dictator.”

The only difference is it would be Xi Jinping who was saying it to describe Trump.

Other than that, though, a Trump-hosted APEC meeting would likely have been unrecognizably different from the successful and productive forum hosted by President Joe Biden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 100 points 11 months ago

To be fair, a ham sandwich would've handled Xi's visit better than Trump too.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago

To be fair, skillfully is not a Trump skill

[-] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It's a low bar. Knowing the current US president is beyond his level of coherence.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 7 points 11 months ago

More coherent than the last 🤷‍♂️

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

This is not going to be a popular opinion on here, but when it comes to Asia, Biden's foreign policy is almost indistinguishable from Trump's.

Basically: aggressive ratcheting of trade and tech restrictions on China; gum up the international trading framework (e.g. WTO dispute resolution process); try to woo China's neighbors but steadfastly ignore their requests for better trade access with the US; discourage Chinese scientists and students from coming to the US. All of these initiatives originated under Trump, and are being continued under Biden, with minor tweaks.

[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

After the Obama administration both parties have taken hardline stances on China. Their theft of intellectual property, ignoring international law, massive subsidies of industries that target foreign economies, human rights abuses, wolf warrior diplomacy etc. etc. had proven that democracy wasn’t going to take root even when they were uplifted economically.

China has no friends in either party now and the reaction of the a potential Hillary Clinton administration in 2016 likely would have been the same.

The US has to brutalize and strangle China’s economy to bring them to the table and force change. There is no need to provide incentives to other Asian powers as China’s actions against their neighbors are enough to put them in the USA’s sphere of influence.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

For different reasons though

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago

Yeah, exactly. Next year, you'll have a choice between an actual president or a human train wreck.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Biden did not "skillfully handle" this at all. He foolishly damaged relations with China even further by calling Xi a dictator after going to the trouble of planning this summit.

If you cowards would vote for the Green party or any other party this wouldn't be a problem. Instead, you support the Democrats who don't even try to repair the damage the Republicans do. They both get rich from it together.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

Third party votes in a First Past the Post voting system are a protest at best and counter-productive at worst.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] utopianfiat@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Greens support Putin, who is genociding queer Russians. No thanks.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Why would i shoot myself in the dick when I could just watch you shoot yourself in the dick?

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] osarusan@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Lol I haven't laughed so hard all day! Thank you, I needed that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Wait, did he suck his honey dick or not?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
394 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19072 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS