42
submitted 1 year ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

(link is to the Supreme Court's opinion document)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mustyOrange@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My generation is so fucked. Between looming climate collapse, rising inequality, inaccessible housing market, it just feels like shit isn't worth even trying for.

We can't even get a small amount of our student loans discharged when prior generations paid basically nothing for them. And - let's not forget - how corps got all of their ppp shit written off. What a joke.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

We can’t even get a small amount of our student loans discharged when prior generations paid basically nothing for them. What a joke

the fact that it's a 6-3 decision is the real meme here. clearly signals that literally no argument would have convinced the conservative majority here--they will always strike this down. real change on this front necessitates making the court irrelevant or just ignoring it at this point.

[-] jim@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Right across ideological lines. It seems unlikely to get politics and ideological beliefs out of the Supreme Court any time soon. The states had no standing in the first place, I'm surprised it didn't get thrown out just due to that.

The overreach by this court has been disasterous, especially in light of the unethical behavior by justices to accept gifts from would-be plantiffs without recusing themselves.

[-] mustyOrange@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep. Unless we pack the court or do something drastic, the US is screwed for decades.

Something has to change. Between the way our legislators are apportioned, to the way the EC works for the presidency, to the SC lifetime appointments, it just feels like theres no fucking hope

[-] Exaggeration207@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Either the Democrats need to make some big changes internally, or a third party is going to have to break up the current duopoly. The current Democratic party sucks, as an effective opposition to the Republicans. The GOP just keeps drifting further to the far-right, and the Democrats continue to compromise even though the demands are becoming more extreme. This drags the whole government toward more conservative policies, regardless of which party is winning the elections.

Change isn't going to happen when you have an aging centrist like Biden in the Oval Office. Governing by compromise is all he knows how to do. And yet, the Democrats still think they're "winning" even though the GOP is actively twisting their arm with every policy they try to pass. We need more people in Congress who are actually liberals, not centrists, and recognize that the current system isn't working for anyone outside outside of the 1%. Until that happens, the far-right is just going to keep turning up the heat, and the rest of the country is going to be stuck sitting there like a frog in a pot of water that is slowly being brought to a boil.

[-] mustyOrange@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Third parties fail in a fptp system unfortunately. The whole fucking system needs to be reworked. Whether that happens before everything falls apart is anyone's guess

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Canada's wildfires are currently 11x worse than they were at the same time last year. And 21x times worse than the average over the past decade. The world's on fire and everything's fucked. Feeling really defeated today.

[-] metaltoilet@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

As a fellow young person the only thing that keeps me motivated for change is the hope that when these guys all die (sorry this is so morbid) we can take some power and create some change.

[-] Pagliacci@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

The major question doctrine acts as a “get-out-of-text-free card” that conservative justices make “magically appear” whenever they see an executive branch policy that goes against their ideological “goals,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a dissent in the 2022 case of West Virginia v. EPA.

Apparently legislating from the bench is fine for Conservatives as long as you make up your own judicial doctrine as justification.

I don't know how we fix the problems we face. The court is seated by politicians, Congress is seated by grifters and ideologues,, and the people are too defeated/controlled to make meaningful changes.

[-] coolin@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I really hate the state of the Supreme Court atm. Looking back, it wasn't a legitimate institution from the beginning, but the current 6-3 court shows how flawed it is, being out of line with public opinion in loads of different cases and effectively legislating from the bench via judicial review.

The only reason it has gotten this bad, though, is because Congress has abdicated its responsibilities as a legislative body and left it more and more to executive orders and court decisions. The entire debate around the Dobbs decision could have been avoided if Dems codified abortion into law, and this one could have avoided too if our Congress actually went to work legislating a solution to the ongoing student loan and college affordability crisis.

I think we need supreme court reform. I'm particularly partial to the idea of having a rotating bench pulled randomly from the lower courts each term, with each party in Congress getting a certain amount of strike outs to take people off that they don't want, similar to the way jurors are selected. I also think the people should be able to overrule the court via referendum, because ultimately we should decide what the constitution says.

I just can't see this happening though, at least for multiple decades until the younger people today get into political power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Exaggeration207@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I refuse to believe this decision was influenced, in any way, by any actual consideration of the U.S. Constitution. There's no reasonable interpretation of that document which would provide sufficient justification to rule the relief plan unconstitutional. This was a political decision, pure and simple, by a government body that is supposed to be apolitical. Just like every other branch of government, the judiciary has become corrupted by billionaire donors and turned into a polarized mockery of its original intent. No wonder public opinion of the Supreme Court is in the toilet. They're no better than Congress these days.

[-] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

But they won't force the fkers that took out PPP loan out on all of the younger people stuck with student loan and further cause inflation to get worse.. I am honestly at the point where I think all of the younger generations need to band together, stop paying taxes and tell the government to just fk off already, they are not a legitimate government institute since they don't represent the will of the people and that we should establish a new government to replace it (using constitution and laws from saner country.)

We legitimately have tried to change this country through Bernie Sanders and instead only for DNC to say, "Lol fk all of you, Hillary Clinton!" in such a non-democratic notation and then they basically hand over the election to Trump and consequentially the 3 Supreme Court Positions to basically permanently screw us over. Even if we voted to get all of the Democrat's majority chairs in congress, they did nothing with it.

I'm tired of all of the double standards, some of my friends have been killed by this institute, because they went homeless, didn't get the medical coverage and all that during covid. To everyone telling people to go and vote, sure, but as long as the current political system is in place, America's only destiny is to further radicalize to the extremist right and democrat party is helping them do it. American government is NOT legitimate and it's not a democracy.

/rant

[-] jonsnothere@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

It's hard to predict if Bernie would have beaten Trump. The GOP likely has a binder full of opposition research ready to go if Bernie had become nominee, with enough "scandals" and "socialist scare quotes" to mobilize their base even more. Meanwhile, Sanders didn't even get more votes in the primary.

And yes, Trump winning in 2016 was a huge blow, with a lot of momentum from things like the Comey investigation and a more divided left base than on the right.

But it's not fair to say that we should turn our back on politics, as this is exactly what causes the "will of the people" to not be heard. If young people want to be heard, they should vote in the same numbers as the older generations, and think strategically about which choices bring the highest benefit in the real world. Voting for someone who represents your ideals with no chance of winning is worse than voting for someone who only partially represents them but has an actual chance of winning. At least until first past the post is eliminated.

[-] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

With who though? They won't eliminate the first pass the post, good luck ever fixing that one, why remove the thing that got you in office?

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

You're high if you don't think Bernie would have gotten more votes from across the aisle than Biden. That's just an insane argument. The fact that the DNC and Dems in general had issues with Bernie would have brought voters over. We saw when Bernie went on Fox and got a fantastic response that he was more able to cross that gap than some corporate Dem. I'd say voting for Biden in fear, or any same-ol' candidate just perpetuates the bullshit of the past 5 decades.

[-] Silverstrings 5 points 1 year ago

Bernie or busters are what got us into this situation in the first place, get the fuck off of your high horse and vote.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] AJYoung@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

I’m sooooo disappointed, but also sooooo not surprised.

Legally, Biden did have weak legal ground, but also legally then the decision shouldn’t have been allowed because the states who sued had, with unanimous decision by the Supreme Court, no legal ground at all.

NPR reports that the Biden admin will have a response and plan announced soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ulkesh@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

It's quite okay to bail out corporations all day long (2008/2009 great recession, 2020 pandemic) to the tune of billions and billions of dollars, but don't even think of helping normal people. Ever.

This just proves it's VERY important to vote and allowing someone like Trump to have 3 court picks has clearly been disastrous in many decisions made by this court.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] ryanlovescooljeans@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Government by the 1%. For the 1%.

Disappointed but can't say I'm terribly surprised.

[-] mint@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

That's cool I just won't pay them. What are you gonna do, not let me buy a house? Oh you mean some shit I'm not able to do anyways? Okay. :)

[-] AfterAll@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

the real answer is they'll garnish your wages

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

I’m blessed in that I was able to go to college for free, but I still think we should help out those who are drowning in debt. It’d be good for the economy too, more people would be able to spend money on luxuries rather then just on debt

[-] bird@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Nooooooo.

Why can't we have anything nice???

[-] Dandylion@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I'm in my mid-40s and I didn't go to college -- I was one of the last generations where you didn't HAVE HAVE HAVE to have an advanced degree to qualify for something like an admin assistant position.

I truly hope that the younger generations take this as an opportunity to stand up for themselves and stop feeding into the notion that everyone needs advanced degrees. It's absurd. If no one has a degree, then they can't demand that people have degrees. Degrees should be for engineers, doctors, people with advanced careers. Past that, it's simply a money making scheme for colleges and a bullshit bill of goods that they're selling to people who cant, and shouldn't have to, pay for it.

[-] JDPoZ@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Framing here's a bit off. You shouldn't have to go to school - sure... as a requirement... but the big thing that's completely being missed (as we have been taught that college is for "fancy" jobs) is that in other decent countries... there is no cost to it.

Advanced educated populaces are seen by non - "authoritarian-run-shit-holes" as something that makes a country more economically competitive in an increasingly global job market.

Whether it's being paid to learn on the job training with a welding apprenticeship subsidized by taxes, or being able to go to medical school via tax-subsidized funds that don't create artificial barriers to entry for the poor for no other reason - it's a good thing for advanced education (and pre-school and every other form of education) to be publicly funded.

[-] maporita@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

But.. those who do go to university and get a degree will earn substantially more in their lifetimes than those who don't. Why should bus drivers have to subsidize the education of lawyers?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Plus_a_Grain_of_Salt@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I'm full of rage, the law means nothing we have no rights, fuck the courts, any petty revenge I can pull to get some type of catharsis I will until the loans are paid off; so for the rest of my life. If anyone has any play to be of mild annoyance, let me know I have one purpose and it's to fuck shit up.

[-] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Can always wheatpaste some anti capitalist propaganda, that's productive, nonviolent, and due to ease of removal may have lower fines if caught.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot 3 points 1 year ago

Any government or legal institution that's unelected with lifetime appointments is illegitimate. I said what I said.

[-] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. The SCOTUS is an illegitimate political institution dependent on good faith participation, which is currently nowhere to be found. We need to pack the court and (eventually) abolish it. Our government institutions need to be designed to put power in the hands of regular people instead of oligarchs.

[-] average650@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Despite the fact that student loans are completely f'd and something needs to be done ab out this, I think this is the riht call. The HEROS act was not meant to be used like this.

Congress needs to do this, not the president...

[-] plopo@possumpat.io 2 points 1 year ago

Looks like there’s at least some safety net from Biden. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/29/biden-safety-net-student-borrowers-00104131

Still, this whole decision is absurd. It’s sad that SCOTUS decisions are effectively bought and sold with this court.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10178 readers
128 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS