534

The poll found 50% of Democrats approve of how Biden has navigated the conflict while 46% disapprove — and the two groups diverge substantially in their views of U.S. support for Israel. Biden’s support on the issue among Democrats is down slightly from August, as an AP-NORC poll conducted then found that 57% of Democrats approved of his handling of the conflict and 40% disapproved.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 105 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s Biden vs trump, and there’s zero chance I’m voting for a waste-of-carbon republican traitor. Now or at any time in the future. I don’t like our stance on Israel/Palestine, but that is immaterial to the choice I must make.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

If it's a choice between one geriatric who endorses genocide and another geriatric who endorses genocide, why should I be voting for either?

I still haven't decided but atm I'm leaning towards 3rd party

This "lesser evil" thing is smoke and mirrors.

[-] UnpledgedCatnapTipper 35 points 1 year ago

Well one endorses genocide, the other wants to enable and cause genocide in our own country. I'd prefer my existence to not be criminalized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately when you have to pick between two lesser evils, even deciding not to choose is a lesser evil. Inaction can sometimes lead to the greatest evil.

Refusing to make a decision doesn't absolve you of culpability for the consequences.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

You wanna shoot yourself in the dick? Hey, your choice. You’re fucking a lot of people, though.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Im with you. Honestly im not sure there is a possible stance I would be happy with. Its like being happy with the strategy used in viet nam.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

It's especially hurting him with the demographic he's always struggled with:

Majorities of Democrats younger than 45 (65%) and nonwhite Democrats (58%) say they disapprove of Biden’s handling of the conflict. Most Democrats 45 and older (67%) and white Democrats (62%) say they approve.

"Knowing that our tax money could be paying for the weapons that are murdering children by the thousands over there, it’s getting harder to be supportive of our president and our country in general,” said Brie Williamson, a 34-year-old Illinois resident. Williamson said she “couldn’t see voting for a Republican” but would consider other options next year.

And being forced to pick between this and trump will depress turnout, and depressed turnout is how Republicans become presidents.

And I know Biden's supporters will say "he's still better than trump" and that's true. But it doesn't change the fact that this is a fucked up situation where voters do t have a say in this issue because the only two options for president both support this genocide.

[-] fosiacat@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

no. running shit candidates is how they lose. no one is entitled to someones vote or support.

dnc wants to win? then look at what your base wants. their approach has always been “you take what we give you” and that resulted in donald fucking trump.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

If a moderate dem wins, they win.

If a Republican wins, moderates get to be even more moderate and claim they have to, knowing whoever they run next time will probably win just because they're not a Republican.

The only way moderates lose, is if a progressive manages to win. Because then they lose the main reason lots of people vote Dem: anything is better than a Republican.

That's why they fight progressives harder than Republicans. Republicans aren't their enemy, they're the rationale that lets moderates in 2023 act like Republicans in 1980 and still win elections

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago

We could have had Bernie, and sure, he'd be 83 in 2024 (Biden will be 81), but at least he had the idea to use Israel funding as leverage to get Netanyahu to calm the fuck down.

Instead, we get Biden, who does seem to have a good economic policy, but he was all too eager to jump to a known war-crime-committer's defense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Ah America. Where we have the great options of genocidal maniac or other genocidal maniac. You see, we're better, because we have the freedom to choose!

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Ah America, you offer the same choice as France and the UK.

[-] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And we can't vote for anyone else, or the wrong lizard might win!

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

It seemed to me (looking in from the outside) that he merely kept on doing what the US had always done.

Apparently it's the public opinion that has changed, while the diplomacy plodded on in it's usual well-travelled trail.

[-] Joe-Blow240@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Who knew that Millennials would hate casual genocide?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

I mean, that's kind of the biggest complaint about Biden and the whole moderate wing...

They act like nothing ever changes and they don't have to react. There's a shit ton of urgent problems they just won't address because they don't give a shit.

They don't honestly have any goals or things to accomplish other than being elected.

So why are we still electing them? The only positive to electing a moderate Dem is a Republican doesn't win. It's why America has been steadily backsliding for decades, and if we keep electing them it'll keep happening.

Best case scenario, politicians like Biden are a "pause button" on America's collapse. And for the people who still have decades of life left, that's just not good enough for us.

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

That's why I voted Biden. I voted Biden in the general election (but voted Bernie in the primaries) because I wanted everyone out of the nightmare circus that was Trump and the Republican regime. A regime we haven't seen so devastatingly retarded since the Bush era. Right now, it's way too dangerous to allow Republicans total control. It's like, look what they do when they're in Congress. Look what they do when they control state governments. They are totally in another realm of reality far off from what we classify as normal today.

I wish we would've ended up with Andrew Yang at least if we couldn't have Bernie. I like Democrats because with Democrats, the worse that they can do is just make small mistakes but mistakes that can be repaired. If we elect a single Republican, that's 4 more years of irreversible damage we're not going to recover from and it'll take over maybe several terms of presidencies to fix maybe a handful of problems.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago

I have a very strong don't blow up kids policy, that doesn't care what religion or political party you subscribe to or even race. If you do blow up kids, we feel strongly that you should just fuck right off and we should do whatever we can to stop those killing kids.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 24 points 1 year ago

"The terrorists are using schools as shields though!"

Guess you shouldn't use artillery strikes and bombing runs then.

[-] Sambarkjand@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

"The terrorists are using schools as shields though!"

"Oh damn that's a genius strategy. Better just give up every military advantage I have and send in my soldiers to be ambushed."

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Is it still called an ambush if you know they are there?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago

Child killers are on both sides though so who are you to speak?

The issue isn't holding a moral high ground or playing into ultimatums of mutually assured destruction since they're already there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 43 points 1 year ago

I said this a week ago and got downvoted to hell, but I'll say it again: this issue will fuck him next November

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Its possible, but how smooth brained would someone have to be to vote for Trump over this?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If so, that’s fucking ridiculous. Jesus fucking Christ democracy will die because Joe Biden didn’t force Israel to stop their genocide and only told them to stop instead????

Fuck this goddamn retarded existence just fucking kill me already Jesus fucking Christ

FUCK THIS GODDAMN PLANET

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

How?

The vast majority of American Jews are Democrats and seem to be supporting Biden's response.

Most pro-palestinian Democrats know that the Republican Party will not advance their cause in any way and not voting will only support the Republican Party.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Disagree, possibly. I will ALWAYS vote for Democrat over Republican. These issues aren’t black and white. Too many other important things to consider in an election.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I hope nearly everyone realizes that. I can't tell if the psyop bots have made their way here already, or if people are really this unbelievably idiotic, but either way, I can't write off Trump winning and doing far more nefarious bullshit than ever before. He will make Florida look like a leftie sanctuary.

I guess the mountain of bigotry, corruption, destabilizing geopolitical decision, dismantling of key government institutions, massive wealth transfer to the .1% during 2016-2020 along with the attempted coup, stacked courts, and Roe V Wade somehow wasn't enough to convince some people that allowing Trump to win will speed run us to Gilead.

I find it extremely difficult to believe anyone who lived through the Trump years who isn't an idiot or a bigot could ever allow that senile madman back in office. Which is why I have to wonder if there's some psyop shit going down. But if he does win, what little shred of hope I retain for this country will be gone and I will need to look into living elsewhere, somehow for the safety of my family.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RedditReject@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

I love how the headline sounds so negative, and yet looking at the Numbers they could have easily just said "more Democrats approve of his handling of the crisis".

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

They need to follow up and ask what their opinion is of Trump and if supporting Israel is enough to convince them to not vote.

Disapproval on it's own, means nothing.

I disapprove of a lot of what Biden has done. Does that mean I'll vote Trump? Fuck no!

It's the difference between 40% disapproval vs. 120% disapproval.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Very few people switch between the two parties...

But around a third of Americans just don't vote.

And stuff like this makes people not vote. And when turnout is low, we end up with republicans in office.

Getting people to show up to vote is kind of the most important thing in an election...

For some reason when it's a moderate dem candidate, it's no longer their job to get votes. It's the voters job to be the adult and vote for someone they dont want who will do things they do t agree with, because the other option will do things they don't agree with

Do you honestly not understand how this is a terrible strategy and maybe, just maybe, wed be better off running good candidates that will try to help?

Not just about this, but with pretty much every major issues facing America today.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Genuine question: other than the speech right after Oct 7 happened, what has Biden even done besides require Ukraine and Israel funding to be in the same bill? I keep seeing posts about Biden's response but I still don't know what it is :c

In my post history, I was leaning towards Israel in the beginning until I learned about the atrocities they committed/are committing. At this point, I'm firmly of the opinion that Palestine needs justice.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Biden hasn't done much other than secure their funding, which is by no means a small amount btw, but he has made a lot of statements about it that people disagree with such as

"This attack has brought to the surface painful memories and the scars left by a millennia of antisemitism and genocide of the Jewish people.

So, in this moment, we must be crystal clear: We stand with Israel. We stand with Israel. And we will make sure Israel has what it needs to take care of its citizens, defend itself, and respond to this attack.

There is no justification for terrorism. There is no excuse.

...

The loss of innocent life is heartbreaking.

Like every nation in the world, Israel has the right to respond — indeed has a duty to respond — to these vicious attacks.

I just got off the phone with — the third call with Prime Minister Netanyahu. And I told him if the United States experienced what Israel is experiencing, our response would be swift, decisive, and overwhelming.

We also discussed how democracies like Israel and the United States are stronger and more secure when we act according to the rule of law."

~ WhiteHouse.gov

Kind of hard to walk back a statement that basically boils down to "Killing innocents is wrong when they do it, but it is good when we do it."

EDIT: some typos

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

So, a majority of Democrats approve of Biden's response? I see.

[-] Joe-Blow240@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is one part of why it is even possible for him to lose. States that managed to eek out an extra brain cell last time may not this time. Minnesota, Wisconsin, Georgia, New Mexico, and Arizona could be in play for anyone with a heart beat that is not Joe Biden.

There had better be a strong Democrat primary in 2024. If the party capitulates to Biden, the base is going to heave a depressed sigh and probably stay home. The loud people online who swear Americans are too afraid not to vote for him are a tiny vocal faction. 2016 should have proven that. Many more people would rather watch it burn than continue the farce that got us here.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Pro-Tip - Nobody serious will primary him.

The history of primarying a sitting President is that if you do the damage, you won't win, but the President will fail in the General.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] DharkStare@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Biden is almost guaranteed to be the Democrat nominee. They aren't going to do a serious campaign against their own incumbent.

The 2024 election is going to be Biden vs Trump unless one of them dies or goes to jail.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snownyte@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Nobody is a winner when it comes to holy wars, which is what this is all about. Everyone's a loser. I mean, what the hell can you do when one part of a country wants to annihilate another populace based on belief?

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

So weird that funding a genocide isn’t well received.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

I'm just here to take a drink everytime I see a "well if you don't vote for him, you vote for Trump" comments. Let's get me drunk, people.

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 25 points 1 year ago

I mean... Take a drink I guess. If you've got ideas on how to replace the FPTP voting system without a violent revolution then I'm all ears.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
534 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS