39

Like, the site owners/employees/admins/mods are the only ones who choose what to post(and hopefully not extremely bias and a good spread of topics), but the users can still upvote/downvote the post as well as comment and all that?

I like the aggregation mark down style of these sites, but I am not sure about the curation being purely user based. I am curious if the users having a large majority control of the curation hurts the quality, and I'd like to see comparisons if they exist.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca 39 points 10 months ago

honestly, sounds like you are looking for a comment section on a news network to me. maybe im missing something.

[-] mob@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I guess kind of.

But the idea would still be an aggregation of different sources, but mainly curated by a select few, rather than the full population. Users would still influence post order and all that.

Ohwell, I didn't think it'd exist, or be well known if it does, but was just posting to see if anyone here knew of anything.

[-] br3d@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Flipboard sounds a lot like what you're looking for

[-] vzq 25 points 10 months ago

I think you just reinvented slashdot.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago
[-] mob@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Heard the name before, had no idea what it was. Guess that Fatboy Slim Slash Dot song brainwashed me into thinking it was the only Slash Dot that matters ha

Appreciate it

[-] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Check out Hacker News. Their mission is to only allow thought provoking posts and to not allow enshitification or dumbing down of their platform.

Users can still post content but it is more highly moderated to maintain quality. The users tend to be techy so user submissions are higher quality than average reddit/lemmy posts.

There is a lemmy community that reposts articles from hacker news but now I just browse it on their website or using the Android app Harmonic which I recommend.

[-] mob@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Actually I stumbled onto that one before I posted. I have a new goal in life to get to a level that Hacker News posts are just light reading for me.

For now, most of that is way above my pay grade but I loved the posts I understood ha

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's a bot that reposts HN content, but I'm not sure if it has its own community. And if it does, I don't think there's any restrictions on posting from users.

Edit: There is !hackernews@derp.foo . It doesn't limit users from posting though, but I don't see anyone really posting other than the bot anyway.

[-] player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, some of them are way too technical for me as well. Only some of the articles end up getting reposted to lemmy though, when I browse directly on hacker news, I tend to find a good mix of articles that are less technical but still interesting.

[-] SnotFlickerman 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

but I am not sure about the curation being purely user based.

So you don't trust random users, but you do trust... random admins or moderators?

Your logic here is not sound. They're just as likely to be biased or leave out important information.

If you want it like that, I think you should follow @Uncle's suggestion and just use news sites like Associated Press or Reuters.

Seriously, why would the curation be any better when done by an admin or mod versus average users?

Oh look at that, I'm an average Lemmy user, and I just made a news community and now I'm the moderator of it. See what I'm saying here? If you don't trust users, well.... users are where mods come from, so I don't know what to tell you.

[-] mob@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You brought in trust, I didn't.

I just don't think purely population based curation is coming up with the best content selection. I wanted to see alternatives.

[-] SnotFlickerman 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I just don’t think purely population based curation is coming up with the best content selection.

Ergo, you don't trust that users are able to curate as well as an individual, despite the fact that the individual is just one of many users.

Just because you didn't use the word "trust" doesn't mean you're not describing not trusting that you'll get the best curated content from a large group of users as opposed to a small group. It's literally exactly what you're describing, that you don't trust you'll get the best results from a group.

[-] mob@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wanted to see alternatives to compare.

I guess you can consider branching out a distrust of what is known.

Would that mean you would trust mob mentality over the mentality of an individual as a rule then?

Tbh though, I'm not sure why you are being confrontational, I just was asking about alternatives for curiosity reasons. It's nothing I'm really invested in, just wanted to explore.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

You can already do that on Lemmy. !brainworms@lemm.ee for example.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thats Digg these days, though comments are sparse.

[-] hahattpro@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

hackernew ?

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35281 readers
644 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS