901
submitted 10 months ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 191 points 10 months ago

It's a shame how obvious they're working their corporate bullying cards simply because of money. Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it. That would be ridiculous, right? Well, that's what Facebook is doing, just with money.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago

It's not what Facebook is doing. The company has owned the trademark for over a decade, and Facebook is trying to strong arm them into giving it up.

This is also in the UK where they somewhat stand up to companies like Facebook. McDonald's lost their trademark for the Big Mac for trying to do this exact same thing.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Maybe I didn't convey what I'm saying well. Facebook is attempting to take a name because they have money. Laws don't really apply to them, they seem to think, and it's because of their bullying and their money.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Came across differently in your initial comment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago

Facebook isn’t suing Threads. The longtime trademark holder is suing Facebook.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

Okay, pointing out the analogy of "Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it [...] Well, that’s what Facebook is doing" doesn't match this situation.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Facebook created a product called Threads and is attempting to bully Threads Software into taking their name. I was creating a hypothetical situation about how most small companies can't just steal a company trademark, because it's rightfully someone else's. However, if you are a larger company and, have enough money, and have shit ethics, then you can just kinda... ignore that, and for some reason, the US is happy to let wallets write the law.

They did this with Meta, too.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

I agree, that is what they're doing. My only point was they're being sued, not suing someone. They just took the name and were ignoring the other company that was already using it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 76 points 10 months ago

Fuck I wish my old elementary school friends and parents wouldn't use Messenger. I'm eternslly stuck on that platform.

[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Does Whatsapp connect to messenger like Instagram does? Not sure it's any better though, since it's still owned by Meta. I wish I could get everyone on signal

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 11 points 10 months ago

i saw one person do something like this: messages JOIN ME ON SIGNAL(or anything not owned by Facebook and amazon) IF YOU DON'T WANT TO WELL WILL LOSE CONTACT SO PLEASE JOIN ME

im not sure on how well this will work but maybe exclude you're family but try to get them to atleast WhatsApp but even better a private messager also consider xmpp/jabber and matrix for jabber i recommend calyx institute jabber server

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

try to get them to atleast WhatsApp

WhatsApp is also owned by Facebook, so switching to that from Messenger is a bit like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Telegram or Signal. Whatsapp is owned by Meta

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

You're not stuck. Just leave, and make people talk to you over Signal. If they're not trying to talk to me on Signal or Matrix, I will never see it. This not only got me off of services like Messenger, but also showed who gave enough of a shit about me to go through Signal's simple setup.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 75 points 10 months ago

Didn't they pull the same shit back when they changed the company name to Meta?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 58 points 10 months ago

I predict that years will go by and it'll still be called Threads.

[-] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 10 months ago

Just like Meta is a stolen name. Facebook doesn’t care.

[-] SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

That's why the UK company is using a cease-and-desist approach, which apparently is an option in the UK.

[-] LemmyZed@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Absolutely zero care. Too much money gushing in.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 42 points 10 months ago

Well, since Meta/Facebook will probably be pulling out of the UK along with every other social media company, that’s hardly a “threat”

[-] DannyMac@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago

You mean, "That's hardly a 'thread?'"

I'll see myself out

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 23 points 10 months ago

You mean, “hold this thread as I walk away” 🎶

[-] Amastan@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Threadful this story. Poor wee nerds. Fight them Meta’s

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Do you want to destroy my sweater?!?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sooperstition@lemmy.one 6 points 10 months ago

Does that mean we’re in for an influx of br*tish people?

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 16 points 10 months ago
[-] Alchemy@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Your comment shows it will be posted "in 17 minutes", I have never seen that before.

[-] kirby@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 months ago

9 more minutes I'm so exited

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 10 months ago

It's a kbin/lemmy integration thing. Although I did think it was fixed now.

[-] Alchemy@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Too bad, I was thinking this future-past connection thing we had could be really lucrative for us.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah, sorry. I can't give you any lottery numbers just in time to buy a ticket.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Wow, you speak English so well! /s

[-] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

I think you mean Bri*ish

[-] BenGFHC@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

We're already here. We lurk in the shadows.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zerkrazus@kbin.social 34 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if FB/Meta tried to just settle out of court and pay them off.

[-] mPony@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago

"That'll be one billion quid, please."

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

They will. This was most likely planned by their legal team in advance, will cost Facebook a negligible amount compared to their revenue and marked as a “risk.” And when they settle it will be a planned business expense, like a fine

[-] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 10 months ago

What would it have cost Facebook to come up with a different name?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

The company has said that they've spent a decade building their "brand" under that name. So, if they're pushing for a big payout, they intend it to be gargantuan rather than the usual payoff. Changing their name would essentially be starting over in some ways. And the confusion they claim as their reason for action is a legit thing.

I'm not saying that isn't their goal behind the scenes, but FB tried to buy the name and failed, so I have a feeling they aren't looking for the usual quiet payoff that's the goal of that type of action.

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 30 points 10 months ago

Isn't this just business news?

[-] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Threads isn't even a good name lol

[-] woshang@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Never download the Meta Threads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] netchami@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Take the L, Facebook!

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Eh I don't think they have much of a claim here. Threads is a super common word in software and Facebook can so what they want with their own platform.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

The problem is that the company doing this is in messaging. It isn't a direct competitor, but it's a legit proposition, as per the analysis lawyers have made. It's big enough news that the usual outlets have chimed in, and the gist has been that a suit would have standing

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
901 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58125 readers
3937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS