83
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

That's funny, the first Eva Braun loved the spotlight.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 10 points 13 hours ago

Eva Braun ?

[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 10 points 15 hours ago

This story really isn't more complicated than: psychopaths like power and attention.

She and he have a mutually beneficial symbiosis where she lavishes him with attention and he lavishes her with access to power.

Not exactly novel for Trump.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 7 points 14 hours ago

Sounds like a massive piece of shit. She should fit right in.

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 29 points 19 hours ago

Others close to the White House decried Ossoff’s mention of Harp, contending that it made false insinuations about an aide who’s largely unknown to voters — and who had done nothing to invite such attention. One person familiar with the matter said she and Trump have a “father-daughter” relationship.

It's Trump we're speaking about. A “father-daughter relationship” prevents nothing for him…

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 18 points 17 hours ago

"done nothing to invite such attention," huh? She's the closest aide to not only one of the biggest assholes in the world, but he's the sitting US President, and he's currently holding our country down and fucking it to death.

Everyone in Trump's orbit deserves the highest level of public scrutiny. I'd be surprised if any one of them hasn't committed numerous crimes to support our felon in chief.

[-] femtek 13 points 18 hours ago

It encourages it even.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago

She's like a sitcom character someone would write as a joke about overly-devoted employees and then erase because it was too absurd.

[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Nothing liek the smell of cold soggy wet adult diapers in the morning... and noon... and night...

[-] prole 9 points 18 hours ago

She looks like Barron. Eww

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

So will she be Lie-vitt II? What does Trump rate higher? Her lies or her blowjobs?

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
83 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30843 readers
1887 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS