[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago

Just call it Condensation.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

My most recent play (first one in 1.2) I did random nodes. I think it's a bunch more fun. It broke from the typical "this goes here and this has to go here" mindset. I started off in Grass Fields and there's three uranium deposits in the start area. It made early game pretty spicy but I'm working on building a nuclear power plant over the giant waterfall by Grass Fields. I built one in the swamp before but I hate being in the swamp so never saw it once I built it.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

That's the thing that's been an issue. Companies give their LLMs access to everything so certain key people have access to these documents. But normally access is key coded, and without hacking in a way that's usually very visible to sysadmins, you just cannot get access at all. With LLMs, it wants to give you what you want. There is not currently a way to keep it from being a pushover in some way. It is in part weakness of human language, and part weakness of programming it to work for whomever is doing the asking prompts. There is likely not a way to use language to make it keep secrets through all the possible ways to ask it to give you things. Nothing akin to the hardened ability of good old fashioned password protection at least. And that's true with potential designs that we've not even seen yet. Currently, it can't keep track of where data originated after a short time. It's just all data to the model. So you might not easily get access to a file directly, but you can access what it knows about a file because again, it's all just data and words at that stage.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

I honestly don't think you can create guard rails against prompt engineering in a working LLM. At some point, they're going to fail or the LLM isn't functioning. The only solution is to make sure they can't read data you don't want shared.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

My best friend was military. Raised Mormon, though he spent a decent amount of time in boys homes (very crazy mom) and went into the military as quickly as he could. Very typical meathead character, doing basic toxic male shit. He was working for the military when I met him. And I met him because he was leaving his faith when he learned about atheism. Since then, he became a pacifist (I helped him through his conscientious objector status to get out of the military), got rid of his guns, became a staunch Democrat, recognized his suppressed bisexuality, and started working on his mental health. If you put the person I first met, next to the person he is today, he's only visually the same. Completely different person. It's not normal to have such extreme changes. Most of us don't have those polar changes in life. But some people do. Platner sounds a lot like my friend. He has been angry for a while but finally put on the They Live glasses and figured out who and what to be angry at. Could it all be a farce? Yeah. We could be being misled. Any politician can be someone else. Platner's story thus far is absolutely plausible. And it's been scrutinized heavily. He's not a George Santos. He IS however targeted by Israel and the oligarchs. So, I'm choosing to believe his story, one that I've seen before, over targeted talking points that are being used in paid ads by AIPAC.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

We need some kind of world ending Bingo card here in the States.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Musk was doing the bidding of the Tech Bros. Project 2025 was a separate entity with sometimes overlapping goals. We've got a lot of villains here. Putin was/is supporting both factions monetarily and technologically because the goal of all of it is to tear the US down. Which is his main goal. Project 2025 wants a theocracy and the Tech Bros want a feudal state. They're happy enough to have it be a theocratic feudal state as long as they're running everything.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

I'm getting by. The whole application process has become comical a few times. I'm assuming there's just a powerful consortium working against me. I've pondered, almost daily, taking my retirement fund and just finding a quiet and cheap space in Latin America.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I just passed 13 months

205
[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 196 points 3 months ago

There's still the option that it was a faked death. That much wealth and power, if it could be done, that's who and when it would be done. I'm not giving it much credence without more evidence, but I've got no reason to think that it's not possible given the series of absurd happenings that morning.

283
submitted 7 months ago by gdog05@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Seemingly thousands of people currently, based on the video and I've seen reports that more are showing up every few minutes.

98
Equinsu Ocha (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by gdog05@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
27
196
161
128
The value of AI (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by gdog05@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

In an Amazon slideshow for a car media device

446
The fucken nerve (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by gdog05@lemmy.world to c/witchymemes@lemmy.world
179
submitted 10 months ago by gdog05@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
149
87
24
submitted 2 years ago by gdog05@lemmy.world to c/90smusic@lemmy.world

I'm sure everyone knows this track but sometimes we overlook the most prominent tracks. It's good to revisit.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 245 points 2 years ago

It doesn't sound to me like he thought he was above the law. He seemed to know the consequences. He just didn't think that Trump should be above the law. Or, at the very least, above presidential decorum.

view more: next ›

gdog05

joined 2 years ago