190
submitted 3 days ago by Sniatch@feddit.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Don't give a shit when their attitude toward supporting games actually running on linux can best be summed up as "Fuck 'em".

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago
[-] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago

First day on the internet?

[-] RQG@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago

I feel my last day in the Internet is coming closer tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sirico@feddit.uk 59 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] Toga77@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Tim Sweeney is one of the most stupid people to end up where he is.

Dude hasn't had a good take ina decade and all he has to do is make his storefront not suck but instead he funnels money toward throwing free games at people like a parent trying to win their kids affection on Christmas instead of yanno, by being a damn parent.

Epic store sucks, Tim Sweeney sucks even more.

[-] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 57 points 3 days ago
[-] RQG@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Canada is pretty great, even more so when compared to the US.

Linux is pretty great, even more so when compared to Windows.

Comparison holds up.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

As a Canadian…I don’t want to be compared to the US anymore. It’s been our excuse to get worse and worse for decades and I’m tired of it.

Also, I’m liking CachyOS. Yes it’s better than Windows(anything is), but I’m also making an effort to not say things shouldn’t be done just because I’m happier than I was.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, when the move is complete... both will be the same. The enshittification can't be stopped.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Except Tim is saying not to move to either.

[-] ResistingArrest@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago

Switching to Linux is fighting for the freedoms we have today. Every time you install Linux or use MAS you’re not giving Microsoft money, because you dislike their product. It’s the same thing as going to a farmers market instead of Whole Foods. You’re putting your consumer stamp of approval on something you find to be a better product. I won’t switch back unless windows REALLY gets their shit together.

[-] prole 30 points 3 days ago

Oh wow that's a really stupid thing to say.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

He does have half a point that it's like moving to a place that is much less shit

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

hypocrite much? isn't this the guy who has been trash talking linux for years?

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Yes. The guy habitually puts his foot in his mouth

[-] thecatprincx@pawb.social 32 points 3 days ago

Heroic launcher has been doing just fine 🤷

[-] addie@feddit.uk 8 points 3 days ago

It does just fine for claiming the free games and then otherwise ignoring the Epic store, which is perfection. Think I've installed about one out of fifty or so I have available, but the important thing is that Tim doesn't receive a penny.

[-] ieris19@lemmy.zip 45 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is something we should honestly ignore and show a big fat middle finger to anything Epic ever does with Linux until Tim Sweeney is gone.

The company has been actively undermining Linux gaming for years, and they’re only switching gears because it is now convenient and profitable to do si

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

If you care about Indie games, you should definitely support them to put some pressure on valve in regards to:

  • lowering their 30% cut for lower revenue (so something like first 100k free). Right now they lower it only for high grossing games
  • allowing to have lower prices on other platforms. That's genuinely monopoly behavior and I do hope they lose their lawsuits in this regard.
[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

allowing to have lower prices on other platforms. That's genuinely monopoly behavior and I do hope they lose their lawsuits in this regard.

They do allow to do so, what they don't allow is selling Steam keys at a lower proce outside of Steam, if you sell the game on GOG at a lower price (for example) you totally can but if you sell on your website a Steam key for 20€ while on Steam it's at 30€, you can't

[-] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 days ago

Why support epic games when itch.io exists? The platform asks you how much of your profit you want to give it (it does have a heart that turns gray if you choose 0% though). It doesnt have many of the most popular indie games, but it seems like the best option if available

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago

No. Go give money to Itch.io and GOG instead. They're not wannabe monopolists like Timmy Tencent

[-] Switorik@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

They should have different tiers for the 30% cut, but they offer developers much more than any other platform. It's all bundled in their universal 30% cut.

Regarding your second point, they can have lower prices on other platforms. They just can't sell steam keys for less on other platforms.

For example, I can sell a game for $30 on steam, a steam key for $30 on another platform, or the same game for $10 but with no steam key on another platform.

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the correction.

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

GOG was worth supporting for that reason ( until their recent little Nazi incident...) but Epic is far worse for the games industry than anything steam has ever done. Holding games ~~hostage~~ exclusive to try and force people to use their shitty platform is much worse than steam saying the steam price has to match the lowest price off-steam...

[-] rapchee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

price thing is for steam keys specifically

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

I'm really glad for all Valve has done for Linux, but Microsoft is not the monopoly it once was. Chromebooks are the new frontier and Epic is the one taking on the Play Store monopoly.

Add in GOG to the mix with their anti-DRM advocacy and I'm left with a tough choice for who I would rather my 30% store tax to go to.

[-] carrylex@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Chromebooks are the new frontier

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Simple, look at what they invest the money in. Valve pays Proton developers and Linux support, GoG makes some ads about no DRM and invests something on preservation of games, Epic invests money on suing other companies and getting exclusives. Decide which of those is more important to you and spend money there.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

Epic charges less than 30%. I think it was 10-15%. That's their whole selling point. And when I say it is their whole selling point, I do genuinely mean it, because the platform and software itself are pretty bad compared to Steam.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

And their business practices as well. Bringing store exclusivity to the PC games market and paying publishers to delay launches on other stores is not something I want to support.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I never understood why console players always get so worked up about exclusives. People say the stupidest most absolutely nonsensical things like "the PS5 has no games". What the hell do you mean?? The PS5 has lots of games, you're just salty that other people can play those games too. Why can't people just be happy that more people can enjoy the games? They have to have that feeling of superiority I suppose

[-] itsoveranakin_@piefed.zip 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

IMO, the PS5 doesn't have any games that make it special in contrast to PC. Every game I have on my PS5 is also available on PC. The only console maker which really has exclusives is Nintendo, and personally I hate the concept of exclusives. It would be best if every platform would have the same games. I guess nobody would buy consoles than because of their Online services BS like PS Plus which is expensive or Nintendo Switch Online which uses P2P in 2026...

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

And they do everything they can to avoid any upgrades to their store. It took them 2 fucking years to add a cart to make multiple purchases at the same time. Before, if you wanted to buy a game and all its DLC, you had to purchase each of them separately.

[-] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

I don't really care about timed exclusivity, especially when it's just downloading a different launcher. Permanent exclusivity, or worse eventual unavailability I do care about though.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

All thanks the GabeN

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

This will never make it onto my system. GOG, Epic they can all get lost with their proprietary garbage launchers. Steam is the only one I will tolerate, because well it is Steam so not much of a choice there.

[-] Rosbj@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

What will you do if Steam ever turns to shit? We need a diverse ecology of services, to keep then in check.

[-] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

This is the correct take. Buying from one store creates a monopoly and that benefits no-one except that monopolists.

[-] lilith267 1 points 1 day ago

GOG? They're objectively more in line with Linux ideals then Steam will ever be, considering GOG games are 100% usable without the launcher and they didnt pioneer micro transactions

[-] maxihuenu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

brother just lick other evil company toes

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2026
190 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

67077 readers
624 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS