105
Let's remind everyone what this about. He said she lied about being raped and 12 civil jurors (still jurors) decided that she didn't lie and that she was raped.
I still can't get over the President of the USA being a convicted rapist
Ah, so... "Convicted of rape" is a legal term for criminal court. Both "convicted" and "rape" carry legal definitions distinct from the civil version "found liable for sexual assault."
I know it's splitting hairs, but that's what lawyers do.
Civil court cannot impose jail time and does not have a criminal component. Proceedings for each can be had with separate outcomes. Prime example, OJ Simpson. Not guilty of murder, but found liable for death.
Stupid as fuck.
Adjudicated rapist.
Rapist will do.
Agreed.
I’ll grant you your point for convicted, but not rape. We’re not talking in a legal context. The form of sexual assault he was found liable for was very much rape by the standard definition, which is more the correct definition than the legal one.
There could have been a criminal referral in Trump's case, if not for the statute of limitations.
Then he said she lied about that, and another jury awarded her another $83 million. Still waiting for that payout, by the way.
More eventual retirement money invested in the market then.
In the US, the president gets to decide what you do with your money, I guess.
If he keeps doing what he's doing, we'll end up using it as toilet paper or burning it for warmth.
Brasil in the 80s.
You need more warmth?
Let me get back to you on that in a few months.
Winter is coming.
I can tell you wholeheartedly based strictly on the size and quality of my garlic harvest that this past winter was incredibly fucking cold where I live at least
Toy needed a garlic harvest to tell you that?
No? Do you need someone to read what i wrote for you?
...based strictly on the size and quality of my garlic harvest that this past winter was incredibly fucking cold
Lol yeah?
Yeah, he has no say, she could blow it allon Funko Pops if she wanted.
WTAF? Since when does the criminal have any say in how their fine is spent?
Say she lied again.
Was that a defamatory remark from the defamator-in-chief, again? Cha-ching!
I see what you did there.
And while we all know what an impulsive and dim-witted narcissist President Trump is - and the fact that he's been found liable for sexual assault, and maintained a years-long association with Jeffrey Epstein, it is noteworthy that:
He knows not to make this mistake again, namely of openly stating that she lied.
But I can certainly be wrong. He might just do it again. We'll see.
If I was in the press corps, that's the first question I'd ask. "Predisent Trump, you were recently forced to pay 5 million dollars to E. Jean Carroll for her claim that you raped her. How do you respond to that?"
Whatever he said would have to be worth another 100 million or something.
Ask him about his family's crypto scams
It's her money. She can do whatever she wants with it
Die Trump, die. Take your rotten offspring with you and join all the ghouls down in hell.
Your German is excellent!
No one who speaks German could be an evil man.
Joey Joe Joe!!
That's my next concern, how do we get rid of the offspring?
Albania?
The money remained safely in cris? I was not aware of this... It really feels like someone should have told me...
If I were E, I'd consider buying ad space to display my market gains. Maybe a billboard, definitely a website. Possibly hire a guy to make a statue for the national mall. Idk, I'd have some fun with this.
I'm all about finding the thing that would piss him off most, and investing heavily in that.
Billboard at the entrance to Maralago.
He's probably waiting until the new dollar coins get minted so he can pay in currency with his face on it because he is a petty little man.
Yeah, I keep expecting him to simultaneously announce they are discontinuing paper ones with the stupid dollar coin.
No vending machine on the planet will take them.
Bullies gotta bully.
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
105 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30666 readers
1923 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS