263
book burning (leminal.space)
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 40 points 4 days ago

*Slightly worse LinkedIn posts.
They're even more unreadable these days that before

[-] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 2 points 3 days ago

You're reading LinkedIn?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago

I bet that analogy sounded smart in their head

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 19 points 4 days ago

What part of buying rare books and destroying them after feeding them to the model training makes the analogy invalid?

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

They're not targeting rare books. According to the article they're buying books that have an ISBN, which means they're in a global database and probably more likely to be common. The article does say there's uncertainty about whether the people doing this filter out rare books. (because they seem to buy even when a book is overpriced)

Do I like this? No. But describing it as burning the library of Alexandria is dramatic and misleading. We're not losing knowledge forever. But a lot of physical books are being taken out of circulation for a dubious return of value.

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/ai-companies-are-reportedly-shredding-millions-of-books-to-train-models-tech-giants-outsource-to-middlemen-to-secretly-buy-up-books-for-training-material

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

This article I just saw elsewhere on lemmy does claim that the books are rare. But it seems to be misleading. In one point it talks about Dutch antiquarian book collectors receiving requests. But if you click through to the source story (Dutch) it says, "Usually the spam button was quickly pressed, because it was hardly serious to take. Antiquarians only deal in very old books: titles that stem from the time before ISBN codes existed at all."

Again, I don't like what these companies are doing, and wouldn't be opposed to legislation against it. But it's good to be factual and understand what is actually happening.

Having an ISBN number doesn't guarantee there is a digital copy somewhere else or that a significant number of physical copies exist. But it makes it more likely.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago

https://www.news.com.au/technology/online/internet/ai-labs-buy-scan-shred-millions-of-rare-books/news-story/0c3b45a67093ab462a587a0348538ce9

One company, ISBNdb, which boasts that it has the “world’s largest book database”, now offers bulk book buying for AI labs, “up to one million titles per order”, including of “older, rare and specialist volumes”.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Oh, I didn't see that article.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Says the dude making the post, posting himself on linkedin

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago

Say the AI companies themselves. They are openly buying physical books, prioritising rarer ones, tearing them apart to digitise them, and then burning the pages.

[-] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago

And somehow this means there's only one copy so it satisfies copyright. Absurd

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2026
263 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11902 readers
1136 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS